
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another Democratic Stumble</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/46728/another-democratic-stumble/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/46728/another-democratic-stumble/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 21:54:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: casualobserver</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/46728/another-democratic-stumble/comment-page-1/#comment-215605</link>
		<dc:creator>casualobserver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 22:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=46728#comment-215605</guid>
		<description>Not only is this comparison ineffectual at scoring points, but doesn&#039;t anyone else sense the left/liberal/Dem offense is more and more reduced every day to tu quoque argumentation......here and elsewhere?&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I think it is pretty much getting to &quot;game over&quot; for the Dem legislative agenda. Despite Obama playing to his best strength last week, there is zero momentum only a few days later and so how is cap and trade and immigration going to have any chance at all with out any intimidating political capital to spend on it?&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not only is this comparison ineffectual at scoring points, but doesn&#39;t anyone else sense the left/liberal/Dem offense is more and more reduced every day to tu quoque argumentation&#8230;&#8230;here and elsewhere?</p>
<p>I think it is pretty much getting to &#8220;game over&#8221; for the Dem legislative agenda. Despite Obama playing to his best strength last week, there is zero momentum only a few days later and so how is cap and trade and immigration going to have any chance at all with out any intimidating political capital to spend on it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaGoat</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/46728/another-democratic-stumble/comment-page-1/#comment-215541</link>
		<dc:creator>DaGoat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 18:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=46728#comment-215541</guid>
		<description>Sounds like a great DLC position &quot;Obama!  Not quite as bad as Bush!&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like a great DLC position &#8220;Obama!  Not quite as bad as Bush!&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leonidas</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/46728/another-democratic-stumble/comment-page-1/#comment-215529</link>
		<dc:creator>Leonidas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 17:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=46728#comment-215529</guid>
		<description>Also kinda silly as they are counting peple and not positions, for example they count 5 people as AIDS Czars rather than just 1 Czar for the position.  Now if they had claimed 31 insead of 47 they might have a point. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BTW kudos to Russ Feingold (my favorite Progressive because he is ethically clean and did no earmarking).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0909/27265.html#ixzz0RTW2m8A5&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0909/27265...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt; Democratic Sen. Russ Feingold of Wisconsin joined the anti-czar chorus Wednesday, asking Obama to detail the roles and responsibilities of all of the czars in his administration and to explain why he believes the use of czars is consistent with the Senate’s constitutional power to offer advice and consent on top-level executive branch officials.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“To the extent that this undercuts that role and people are put in the place of Cabinet people and really are the key authorities and you can’t question them, that’s something worth talking about,” Feingold said. “I think it’s a fair point.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Feingold says he doesn’t know if there are any constitutional violations, but he suggested that he may hold an oversight hearing on the matter.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now if the DNC can spare time from its ad making schedule)  and they and democrats in Congress would  address Feingold&#039;s concerns, we might get somewhere.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For those keeping score Wiki says:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;George W. Bush	2001–2009	31	&lt;br&gt;Barack Obama	2009–	        32</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also kinda silly as they are counting peple and not positions, for example they count 5 people as AIDS Czars rather than just 1 Czar for the position.  Now if they had claimed 31 insead of 47 they might have a point. </p>
<p>BTW kudos to Russ Feingold (my favorite Progressive because he is ethically clean and did no earmarking).</p>
<p><a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0909/27265.html#ixzz0RTW2m8A5" rel="nofollow">http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0909/27265&#8230;</a></p>
<blockquote><p> Democratic Sen. Russ Feingold of Wisconsin joined the anti-czar chorus Wednesday, asking Obama to detail the roles and responsibilities of all of the czars in his administration and to explain why he believes the use of czars is consistent with the Senate’s constitutional power to offer advice and consent on top-level executive branch officials.</p>
<p>“To the extent that this undercuts that role and people are put in the place of Cabinet people and really are the key authorities and you can’t question them, that’s something worth talking about,” Feingold said. “I think it’s a fair point.”</p>
<p>Feingold says he doesn’t know if there are any constitutional violations, but he suggested that he may hold an oversight hearing on the matter.</p></blockquote>
<p>Now if the DNC can spare time from its ad making schedule)  and they and democrats in Congress would  address Feingold&#39;s concerns, we might get somewhere.</p>
<p>For those keeping score Wiki says:</p>
<p>George W. Bush	2001–2009	31	<br />Barack Obama	2009–	        32</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLS</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/46728/another-democratic-stumble/comment-page-1/#comment-215517</link>
		<dc:creator>DLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=46728#comment-215517</guid>
		<description>You keep raising the issue at your own expense, obviously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You keep raising the issue at your own expense, obviously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

