An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right

Testing The Obama Effect (Guest Voice)

McLEAN, Va. — Will the bitter, smoldering feelings let loose by Washington’s health care fight ricochet across the Potomac River and decide Virginia’s race for governor? Will a Republican be able to escape his right-wing record and his incendiary past writings to rebrand himself as a pragmatist?

The battle for the Virginia statehouse always gets outsized national attention because of its unusual timing, just a year after a presidential election. Virginia results are typically dissected with the kind of passion that readers bring to sorting through the arcane symbols in Dan Brown’s novels.

This time, all the symbology, to use a favorite word of Brown’s, may be justified. President Obama was the first Democrat to win Virginia’s electoral votes since 1964, and his drop in the polls has already had a powerful influence on the direction of this year’s Virginia contest.

As Obama’s numbers fell among independents, so did those of R. Creigh Deeds, the Democratic nominee whose chances of victory now depend in part on the president’s ability to stabilize his own standing.

But Deeds got an enormous boost from an unlikely source: a master’s dissertation written by Republican opponent Bob McDonnell, a one-time protege of Pat Robertson, that was unearthed by The Washington Post.

Among other things, McDonnell, in a rather interesting essay that he authored when he was 34, said that working mothers were detrimental to the family, and that he opposed a Supreme Court decision legalizing contraception for married couples. He also had some less than kind words about homosexuals.

All graduate students would envy McDonnell for the impact of his academic writing, even if the Republican now wishes his thesis had stayed on a dusty shelf. Deeds, who had fallen well-behind McDonnell during the Democratic Party’s awful summer, started closing the gap. A poll this week showed McDonnell’s lead was down to five points.

“Right now,” said one Democratic adviser, “this is a race between Barack Obama’s spending and Bob McDonnell’s thesis.”

Deeds’ summer polling doldrums reflected a campaign that was not prepared for battle after its runaway victory in a June Democratic primary. McDonnell, in the meantime, was busily recasting himself as a problem-solver who cared primarily about jobs and economic growth.

But Deeds (along with just about every other Democrat in the state) was also hurt by Obama’s falling popularity among independents worried about federal spending. And rank-and-file Democrats who adored Obama last year were puzzled and demobilized by the president’s lack of fight as the health care debate droned on.

The McDonnell and Deeds campaigns have the same reading of the public’s mood: McDonnell relentlessly tries to move the campaign to national issues, including health care and cap-and-trade legislation, trying to stoke conservative energy and appeal to middle-of-the-road voters less enthusiastic about Obama than they were last year.

Deeds wants the debate to focus on Virginia — above all the staple issues of roads and schools that powered the victories of Mark Warner, the former governor elected to the U.S. Senate last year, and incumbent Tim Kaine.

Deeds also hopes they will look past McDonnell’s new image to the culture warrior whose emphatic social conservatism would make him unacceptable to the state’s legions of suburban voters, particularly women.

The thesis not only undid McDonnell’s methodical effort to bury his history, but also prompted voters (and the media) to pay more attention to his record. Deeds will be encouraging them in their research.

Yet there will be no escaping the Obama effect, which will come in three parts. First, Obama’s health care speech last week began a rehabilitation process that is already altering the political mood, to Deeds’ advantage. A lethargic Democratic base has flocked to Deeds, pushed by the McDonnell thesis and pulled back in by a renewed confidence in their president.

Obama will also be vital in turning out African-Americans and Virginians under 30. Each group represented about a fifth of the state’s 2008 presidential vote. The Deeds-McDonnell showdown will be the first major test of the president’s ability to deliver his backers when his name is not on the ballot.

But then comes the tricky third part: While getting Obama’s help where he needs it, Deeds still must keep the campaign from getting mired in Washington’s politics of recrimination. If the Democrat can persuade Virginians that McDonnell is no moderate and gets them thinking about clogged highways and the public schools they value, he wins. Doing that will be easier if Obama can change the political winds, even just a little bit.

This column is copyrighted and licensed to run in full on TMV. (c) 2009, Washington Post Writers Group.



4 Responses to “Testing The Obama Effect (Guest Voice)”

  1. Leonidas says:

    Deeds has been trying to distance himself from Obama for quite some time.

    http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/08/07/polit…

    But like some past statewide Democratic candidates, Deeds is struggling with Republican efforts to make him account for positions take by the more liberal national party. So far, Deeds has sidestepped the effort to link him to Obama's healthcare, energy and labor policies by noting that he's running for state, not federal, office.

    Also Deeds has his own problems to worry about

    Deeds on the Defensive Over Collective Bargaining Positions
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/ar…

    Virginia Democratic gubernatorial candidate R. Creigh Deeds found himself in hot water with two organizations representing state public safety employees Tuesday after he gave the groups differing answers about whether he supports collective bargaining for law enforcement personnel.

    Deeds told the Fraternal Order of Police of Virginia in writing that he supports a bill pending before Congress that includes a so-called “meet and confer” provision that would allow public safety employees to send a representative to negotiate wages with local police and sheriff's departments.

    “I am a strong supporter of collective bargaining rights for public safety employees,” he wrote in a questionnaire he returned to the group at the beginning of August.

    But the Deeds campaign now says the questionnaire was filled out incorrectly by a staff member. The senator told members of the Virginia Sheriffs' Association Monday that he does not support collective bargaining, association executive director John Jones said.

    well if you want to distance yourself from Obama blaming a staff member for wrongly filling out a questionnaire and taking an opposite position is not the way to do it.

    Obama: The Buck Stops Over There
    http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2007/12…

    After the Politico raised questions about questionnaire Obama filled out in 1996, Obama supporter Rep. Adam Smith, D-Wa., took to Tucker Carlson's MSNBC Show to say, “He didn't fill it out and he did not support those positions then . . . That was a questionnaire filled out in his first state Senate campaign back in 1996 not by Senator Obama but by somebody on his staff that didn't get it cleared.”

  2. [...] Testing The Obama Effect (Guest Voice) (themoderatevoice.com) [...]

© 2003-2011 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Mode Equity