<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rumored Google &#8216;Flipper&#8217; Launches as &#8216;Fast Flip&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/46301/rumored-google-flipper-launches-as-fast-flip/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/46301/rumored-google-flipper-launches-as-fast-flip/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 10:08:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ordinarysparrow</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/46301/rumored-google-flipper-launches-as-fast-flip/comment-page-1/#comment-214641</link>
		<dc:creator>ordinarysparrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=46301#comment-214641</guid>
		<description>i really like this. . . similar to Speed Dial which is my favorite gadget. . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i really like this. . . similar to Speed Dial which is my favorite gadget. . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carter Cole</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/46301/rumored-google-flipper-launches-as-fast-flip/comment-page-1/#comment-214571</link>
		<dc:creator>Carter Cole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=46301#comment-214571</guid>
		<description>i dodnt think fast flip will change anything heres why &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.cartercole.com/2009/09/review-of-google-fast-flip-why-i-think.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://blog.cartercole.com/2009/09/review-of-go...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i dodnt think fast flip will change anything heres why <a href="http://blog.cartercole.com/2009/09/review-of-google-fast-flip-why-i-think.html" rel="nofollow">http://blog.cartercole.com/2009/09/review-of-go&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: archangel</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/46301/rumored-google-flipper-launches-as-fast-flip/comment-page-1/#comment-214467</link>
		<dc:creator>archangel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 05:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=46301#comment-214467</guid>
		<description>thanks Joe for the article. I tried it out as you suggested. I think, for me, it is way too slow. It loads the whole front page of wherever the article is time x. It takes too long to look at each page and read this little teeny tiny pale blue headline. I&#039;d rather read a list in ebony ink. Faster, easier, more choices all on one page.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;ll be interesting to see if/ why others might like this sort of 10 snapshots of stories per page. I&#039;ve a 30&quot; monitor so can see many. Even so, no good. I&#039;d imagine pp on a 15 or 17&quot; monitor would be even more squinty, as the smaller the image, the smaller the type, but the more images loaded at one time. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;thanks.&lt;br&gt;dr.e</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks Joe for the article. I tried it out as you suggested. I think, for me, it is way too slow. It loads the whole front page of wherever the article is time x. It takes too long to look at each page and read this little teeny tiny pale blue headline. I&#39;d rather read a list in ebony ink. Faster, easier, more choices all on one page.</p>
<p>It&#39;ll be interesting to see if/ why others might like this sort of 10 snapshots of stories per page. I&#39;ve a 30&#8243; monitor so can see many. Even so, no good. I&#39;d imagine pp on a 15 or 17&#8243; monitor would be even more squinty, as the smaller the image, the smaller the type, but the more images loaded at one time. </p>
<p>thanks.<br />dr.e</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

