An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Joe Wilson, Fight Club Master? No, Joe Wilson Wet-Dynamite Disaster

thief_beaten_up_by_72_year_old_boxer.JPG

Where is the public place for loss of personal control? Where is the place for ‘fight club?’ The gridiron, the clay court, the roped ring, and other similar, are where that all belongs… there are many many venues for men (and women and children) who ‘cant bear the burden’ one moment longer, to vent their particular pique or outrage.

Long ago I knew Chained Lightning Johnson, an old battered boxer who’d won his share. He was a disciplined fighter-philosopher. I can still hear him say, ‘the only fight worthy of me and my opponent, is short, hot, hard and contained, with rules that show a clear winner at the end.’ Other kinds of fights? Lightning thought they were initiated by ‘fluffy men flailing at each other,’ all energy wasted in their egos. He believed ‘Them who figure themselves fighters, aint.’ He meant fighters dont marquee themselves outside the ring.

To this old vet, a fight without a clear winner, a fight that just erupts out of nowhere, wasnt a fight. It was a public display, he said– forgive the strong language– of ‘a man going wee-wee on himself in public because he doesnt have the balls to choose the right time and place… and to train hard to win clean and clear.’

Some in lower British parliament do erupt, it is true –always with cameras on–. It is entertaining to some… those stand-up comedians who run like a third-rate Monty Python Non-flying Circus. Amusing perhaps. But forgettable to those who want elected officials to be seasoned and know the time and place to use their strategies… not just ‘pounce and blurt,’ like an unsocialized child.

Even though some in the lower legislative body carry on the oleo, most other UK legislators are more concerned about their own UK soldiers dying, and the children in the e. London outback going hungry, and the influx of old tribal people from the mideast who have immigrated to UK, and some continuing their ‘tradition’ of murdering their own relatives at will.

Legislative bodies that endorse and allow deterioration of their members to drama queens calling out insults like drunkards in bars hooting and reeling while the musicians are trying to play… move legislation crudely slow… while behind the scenes no one is watching … and often the fat cats get fatter and cattier and cattier. Off camera.

It was the murderer Joe Stalin who said, Entertain the people, then crush them while they aren’t paying attention.

Joe Wilson, a fighter? Nah. Joe Wilson, a petulant who is being used.

Here in the west, some of the men I spoke with from VFW, said it in pretty blue terms: Joe Wilson’s outburst was utter disrespect to the President — any President. Some are calling him ‘Pudgy Joe Willy, who had too much puddin’ to eat,’ (an old military insult for a guy who has a big mouth but flabby muscles, one who cant back up his mouthiness with physical muscle). Several others opined JW could be put to sleep with a KO in one second flat. The general consensus was he couldnt hold his own in a real fight. No way. Some thought he was a disgrace the likes of which they’ve never seen and hope to never see again.

Understand, regardless of the vets politics… The real warriors who might agree with Joe’s throb or not, may think the question of health coverage for people in the US without papers needs more clarificaiton… but real warriors pledge fealty to conduct themselves with honor, and to give their President, agreed with politically or not, respect.

It is pretty breathtaking to see honor fall apart so thoroughly in one elected man of such incredible wealth and education, such intense power and privilege. In old school thinking? Joe Wilson coulda been a contendah perhaps. But not after this. “Wet-dynamite” is the name given to contenders who showed promise, but who jump the gun with lack of self control and thereby, disqualify themselves from being thought of as a giant in the game.

Great cauliflower-eared sage, Chained Lightning, used to say something like this: A true fighter admires an opponent who has the steel of patience and discipline. Any one can throw a pouty haymaker or a roundhouse punch. But haymakers and roundhouses never win fights. Never. Discipline wins fights.

_________
CODA
I apologize if the photo at the top is distressing. It is there to make this point: The photo above is that of 24-year-old burglar who, armed with a long-knife, broke into the home of 72-year-old UK pensioner Frank Corti and his wife Margaret. Mr. Corti lunged at the intruder and aimed a solid right hook and a lunge-jab, felling the younger guy “like a sack of spuds.” Corti restrained the burglar until police arrived. The intruder was convicted of aggravated burglary. Mr. Corti, is a well-trained and prize-winning boxer from back in his army days in the 1950s when he served with the Royal Engineers in North Africa.

  • AustinRoth
    OK, the picture and invoking Stalin is more than a little over the top.

    I have been calling out Wilson for his activities, but let's not make this more than it was, either - boorish, uncouth behavior. But not a sign of the end of civilization. Just a jerk.
  • Leonidas
    Congrats Clarissa, you started the 10th thread on the Obama speech. Yay!!! And the 3rd one with jow Wilson in the Title! YaY Again!!!!

    Come on gang use the comments section of another thread, be good sports and let those columnists and editors who posted first stay near the top of the blog.
  • archangel
    hi there AR, the pix is there to speak about the boxer's discipline, (the thread through the story) which is what various at VFW are saying JW lacks: discipline. On another topic ... Today, various online seem to think we ought have more such lack of discipline in the House and Senate, that it'd be good for people to go at each other even more. I'd have to disagree with that.

    I think weighing it for what it is, as you say, uncouth, is right. Mr. Wilson's outburst is also, to many of the older generation I've spoken with this morning, not just that ...but additionally, an affront to the honor they hold for the office, which like respect for the flag, and other symbolic ways of showing respect, they hold dear... most of all, because they themselves have done the yeoman's work in developing those in their own lives. Too, incidentally, they often feel their concerns about peace and honor go unlistened to. That what is dishonor to them, is often tossed off by msm, as a nothing. They see the fractious like JW, as an ongoing wearing away of a code of honor... a code that holds ....in order to get things done, "in order not to make an enemy today of the friend you need tomorrow," is how I would put it.

    Thanks.
  • jkremmers
    A classic put down of a fool. Nice job, Dr.E
  • Leonidas
    Like I said before in another thread, what is the biggest stain to honor saying "You Lied" as an emotional reaction on the spot, or telling lies to the American people from the Bully Pulpit? Not condoning either, I think both weren't good choices but when you compare the scale i think the wrong man is getting the lion's share of the media scorn.
  • tidbits
    Old white southern conservative men should understand and appreciate manners and decorum. Isn't that one of the "traditional American family values" they're always talking about?

    Put up as many posts as you like about this uncivilized (yes, dishonorable and undisciplined) behavior. It can't be said enough. Aren't honor and discipline also "traditional American family values"?

    Will we ever remember how to disagree without this kind of crap?
  • Leonidas
    Speaking of decorum:

    Dems heckled Bush, but Wilson was different

    http://www.politico.com/blogs/glennthrush/0909/...

    Joe Wilson's 15 minutes of infamy notwithstanding, Democrats were pretty rough on George W. Bush during a joint sessions a few years back.

    Two examples:

    In 2004, Democrats delivered a “Chorus Of Boos” during Bush's Bush’s State Of The Union when he called for renewal of the Patriot Act., according to the Washington Times.

    In 2005, Dems howled, hissed and shouted "No!" when Bush pushed for Social Security reform in the SOU: "Foreshadowing the contentiousness of the coming debate, Democrats broke decorum and booed twice," according to the National Journal.

    At the time, CNN's Bill Schneider remarked, “It was unusual. I had never heard it at least at that level before. The Democrats clearly were booing, heckling, saying no when the president talked about the crisis in Social Security."

    Moreover, Obama's claim that illegal immigrants won't be covered -- which sparked Wilson's outburst -- while technically accurate, doesn't quite tell the entire story. Some of the bills being considered in the House and Senate contain provisions locking in local statutes that prevent providers from inquiring about immigration status prior to treatment. And illegals are treated, and are bound to be treated, in ERs, covered by local, state and federal uninsured pools.

    So why the outcry over Wilson?

    I think it's because Congressional Republicans have used the health care debate to vent a deeper, uglier contempt for Obama that verges on the personal.

    They've done little to discourage the party's fringes from questioning Obama's legitimacy to serve through the birther movement, fitness to govern through the death panel canard -- and even the territorial integrity of the US under a Democratic president through Texas Gov. Rick Perry's flirtation with secession.

    Anger may stoke the base at town halls -- and goose Glenn Beck -- but it just looks ugly on the national stage.
  • casualobserver
    dr e,

    I missed your post when you called out Harry Reid for saying...and I quote......."President Bush is a liar".

    Would you be kind enough to find it for me in the archives?

    Thanks.
  • Leonidas
    Let me help her remember

    Interview with Senator Harry Reid, NBC’s Meet the Press, December 5, 2004

    MR. RUSSERT: When the president talked about Yucca Mountain and moving the nation's nuclear waste there, you were very, very, very strong in your words. You said, "President Bush is a liar. He betrayed Nevada and he betrayed the country."

    Is that rhetoric appropriate?

    SEN. REID: I don't know if that rhetoric is appropriate. That's how I feel, and that's how I felt. I think to take that issue, Tim, to take the most poisonous substance known to man, plutonium, and haul 70,000 tons of it across the highways and railways of this country, past schools and churches and people's businesses is wrong. It's something that is being forced upon this country by the utilities, and it's wrong. And we have to stop it. And people may not like what I said, but I said it, and I don't back off one bit.


    Lots of Democratic hypocrisy starting to come out of the woodwork it seems.
  • ordinarysparrow
    dear Dr. E. this may not make sense except in my own mind. I was reading the post by Swaraaj Chauhan on Afghanistan Bhagavan Gita and business schools. . .both of your post together make for interesting pondering. . .after reading Swaraaj Chauhan started thinking about the Tao Te Ching and what is says about leadership and governing a Nation and the incident with Joe Wilson. . . remembered one of my favorite Tao quotes.

    "If you want to govern the people,
    you must place yourself below them.
    If you want to lead the people,
    you must learn how to follow them."
    Tao Te Ching 66

    then came and read your piece on Joe Wilson. . .

    looks like Joe was putting himself below the Townhall hecklers, biters, and birthers and was just following them. . . in a Western retrograde sort of a way, perhaps Joe is just a good old Taoist. . .

    "as far as the East is from the West ". . .

    and Thanks Dr. E. for being a truth speaker and having a shiny mirror that allows us and others to see the image that we display. . .on the other side of Joe Wilson being sorched by the fire from his own mouth perhaps he will be a wiser leader?. . .
  • D. E.Rodriguez
    Good post, dr. e.

    But why do some of these comments remind me of some six-year old crying to his teacher, "But Johnny did it first"?, or "Johnny does it, too!"
  • casualobserver
    And why do certain posters exhibit a seemingly contradictory attraction to everything uttered by Rush Limbaugh each day? Dr. Phil did an interesting piece on the condition awhile back. Unfortunately, I don't believe the treatment will be covered under Obamacare.
  • Thanks Dr. Estes. There are two reactions from the right. AR, whom I've dubbed "unnervingly moderate" on occasion, again shows that one can be civil while disagreeing and even be a Republican without being a jerk <g>. CO and Leonidas on the other hand are playing along with the far right echo chamber headed by Limbaugh and his ilk.

    I'm not complaining. Go ahead and circle the wagons around obnoxious jerks with bad manners. It hurts your image with most Americans, which pleases me. As for "they did it too," I'm fine with you guys using juvenile excuses, too.
  • tidbits
    This is admittedly slightly off topic, but relates to the subject that caused Wilson's outburst...I've raised it on another thread as well.

    We are talking about a plan that mandates insurance, with which I disagree from the get-go. But, if we are going to mandate insurance, why not include undocumented aliens? We entice "them" to come here to provide our cheap labor force, but don't want responsibility once "they" arrive. On the health issue, "they" come to "our" homes to work, "their" children attend school with "our" children, date and sometimes have babies with or marry "our" citizens.

    It has been 50 years since Edward R. Morrow's expose' on the treatment of migrant workers and nearly as long since Phil Ochs wrote "Brassero". Am I anywhere near correct to say that on many farms the animals receive better medical care than the human beings who work in the fields? The human beings we encouraged, recruited, to come here.

    I don't mean to sound like a flaming liberal, but this has been eating at my conscience since I tied the issue of Wilson's comment and undocumented workers together earlier today, and I find myself deeply disturbed at a fundamental moral level that we as a people entice others to come here, then assume "we" have a right to treat "them" like dirt after they arrive.
  • DLS
    "let's not make this more than it was"

    Already amplified enormously, as predicted, complete with venom totally subsuming the original act.
  • DLS
    "telling lies to the American people from the Bully Pulpit"

    It was predicted, no different than usual this year, and we weren't disappointed. Fortunately, there were a handful of actual relevent serious elements of the speech, a handful of diamonds in a polluted field.
  • ordinarysparrow
    "Dr. Phil did an interesting piece on the condition awhile back. Unfortunately, I don't believe the treatment will be covered under Obamacare."

    now that is funny Casual Observer. . .

    but it might be covered by big Pharma that sponsors Dr. Phil and would like to be a chief sponsor of Obamacare?
  • DLS
    Fortunately, Obama didn't choose Sanjay Gupta or Dr. Phil, teevee celebs, to be Surgeon General.

    (Interestingly, he chose notorious Carol Browner to be "climate change" czar, but not Stephen Schneider. I guess it involves doing mainly figurehead or lightweight stuff rather than what could be more dangerous for us.)
  • DLS
    "we as a people entice others to come here"

    Actually, some activists want no limits, or say we "owe" hospitality to everyone and that anyone who comes here deserves voting and entitlement rights, etc. family reunification rather than a qualification system for individuals, and then with the GOP there is the business community and "corporate whore" stuff from the likes of Cato who get all emotional about it -- "anyone who risks death _deserves_ to be here!" -- when they're just barking on behalf of big business who funds them.
  • archangel
    dear Casual Observer: I dont have a dog in the fight at the snowball fort. If I did, I would start with not the way politicians treat each other going way back, but the way many Americans treated my immigrant family... and still do. Another story for another time perhaps.

    I mentioned elsewhere on TMV yesterday and today, I feel sorry for Mr. Wilson of SC. He made a huge tactical error. It may cost him his seat. Not the least of which is his explanation that it was 'spontaneous.' Well, we've all said stupid things out loud in the heat of an argument even with loved ones, accusing them of who knows what, but usually not at funerals or weddings or speeches by the President, et al. It probably doesnt matter what word he uses to describe his lack of respect. What shows above ground most, despite whatever his inner workings, is that he became so emotional he lost control of himself.

    We've all been there. But hopefully not while representing a huge consituency that is relying on you to have position and power in your House seat with your R colleagues who can help or hurt you bad, not while representing a party with millions of members who are already in some ways, down for the count, and you just cause others to shake their heads and lose even more confidence.

    Those who are heavy strategists in the R party know they cannot afford a person who alienates their own constituency-- a populace back home who is suffering now regarding many things, the least of which is if a health care bill still in motion is carrying a clause about people without papers. Not that that isnt an issue. But, that there are legal means to solve/ resolve/ debate/ collaborate on such. Not by showing lack of restraint.

    Mr. Wilson's state has oceans of poor , disabled, unemployed and deployed. They all vote. It isnt the man/ woman who calls the other team a name who wins at the polls. It's the man or woman who can bring home the bacon.

    'Bacon gaining' depends on being assigned to powerful positions in House and Senate. Like Tom Tancredo before him who also could not contain his talk and act with respect to President Bush's wishes... and President Bush, (according to Tancredo,) told him literally not to darken the White House door again-- Mr. Wilson is likely to be demoted and not appointed by his own party, and just have his 'chair' suddenly disappear from the table of the real powerbrokers in the House.

    That's what happened with Tancredo also. He didnt run again not exactly because he couldnt get re-elected. He might have been. But it was because other R's were treating his loose cannon mouth, as though he were pariah instead of wise man. He was cut out of the power-brokering... which amongst D and R is team playing. Not going off to stand on your own poop deck, as though you dont care about how your actions/reactions affect everyone else in your party.

    I feel sorry for the people of SC who struggle so, who depended on Mr. JW.

    He's apologized to the president. The president accepted. But, it's not the end of the story would be my guess. Stories have geneology. This one about Rep Wilson belongs to a larger story about the state of the R party at this time.

    These are a few of the places I'm coming from.
    Thanks CO.
  • archangel
    Dear DLS; there's a truth in what you said about big business and people who come here specifically to work. There have been three massive deportations of workers from Central and South America from the US. In all cases, big business literally went to the southern nations and specifically brought in tens of thousands of workers. WHen the time was right for business to cash in, the workers who had often been here legally for years, were sent back across the borders without a fare thee well. Many families remember.
  • casualobserver
    Firstly, let me acknowledge that I accept your reaction as heartfelt social commentary as opposed to manufactured for political scoring. (I've read your posts for a couple of years now.)

    Secondly, let's simply agree to have different views on the ramifications of Wilson's commentary outside the political media and blogosphere.

    In my view, the man on the street who watched last night was focused on what Obama was saying and processing that against his own circumstances. The Wilson comment was not readily audibly understandable in real time and half the viewers probably left the broadcast before the pundits defined the comment clearly. Even for those who heard it live or regurgitated, I'll submit very few woke up this morning and carried the comment with them.

    This is not the stuff that turns or remains in regular people's minds. They are not suffering your angst nor the angst of Joe Gandelman over it.

    How do I arrive at such a conclusion? Well, ever since Rush Limbaugh uttered his "Obama fail" commentary last January, Mr. Joe has just about weekly found something to mark the demise of Republican electability accompanied by the prediction that moderates and independents would no longer consider them.

    Being the gullible sort that I am, no doubt he had me through the first six or seven times he cried wolf. But, long about the 16th time, I noticed he never really quoted any support for his personal conjecture and, around the 22nd time he said it, I looked at polls from January to the present. While the Republican favorability ratings are nothing to brag about, these never actually got worse throughout the entirety of his 32 predictions.

    I hate to jump to rash conclusions, but I am beginning to wonder just a wee bit if all this angst over hardball political language is really not having the impact so many of the authors and posters here are suffering daily over.











  • archangel
    dear Casual Observer, thanks for your gracious response, and outlining where youre coming from. (I didnt realize you'd been reading for 2 yrs, shhhhh, you'll give away my age. lol)

    You're right, most everyone weighs what powerful people say against their own situ. NIMBY (not in my back yard) activism is perhaps less prominent than WAYGTDFM--(I'm laughing at how that acronym worked out, looks like a swear word a little, doesnt it?) But, it means What Are You Going To Do For Me? I think a lot of us are wanting to know how x or y by legislatures are going to help us, or give us one more pain in the neck.

    This afternoon I attended a funeral of a well loved and prominent person in the larger community here. There were maybe 500 people at the funeral. After while waiting for the casket to be brought to the hearse, people all stood around on the sidewalks of the temple, just talking.I walked the entire long long sidewalk, and get this... many people were speaking about Joe Wilson. The people were mostly older, and they are mostly first generation American Jews, and this was one more take on the JW situ... there was an undercurrent, ever so slight, and certainly not above ground completely, of , perhaps I could call it 'tenseness'... between the fellows who show up at town hall wearing firearms, a congressman bearing what they see as false witness in order to demean (their point of view) the President, some of the slinging around on the internet that everything is either jews, blacks, latinos, etc fault... well... these events, well publicized, add up for quite a few people who are different than you and I.

    The good old guys at the VFW have similar views of the dishonor of JW, but some of them, for different reasons.

    Incidentally, the Jewish man buried today served in WWII and his coffin was topped with the US Flag tri-folded. He might have had a point of view that straddled both this community of Jews and the guys at the VFW.

    Anyway, just a bit more of where I'm coming from. I dont know about the polls, Casual, in part because having studied stat in college, I know they are so full of holes in terms of controls, that it is hard to imagine they are a snapshot of anything but the phoner's shoes. I do like to listen to just regular people wherever I go and report back. I think people like them, like you and me, have things to say that you wont see highlighted above the fold in the nyt, lat, ct, csm, well, maybe the csm.

    I have to demur (did I spell that right?) Casual... I dont think I feel angst about various and sundry, and cant speak for JoeG, but dont think he is angst-driven either. But, what I do think, is that peace doesnt require people to be syrupy-nice to each other, (and then stab each other in the back later) but I do admire people who hold to peaceful means to get the work done. That's part of why I write about cowboys, boxers, farriers, street ministers, regular people, all of us, who are managing to keep it real but also proceed in dignity... hopefully more days than not.

    Thanks CO,

    dr.e
  • DLS
    "In all cases, big business literally went to the southern nations and specifically brought in tens of thousands of workers."

    Hi, Dr. E.

    Gee, this wouldn't involve the huge meatpackers, by chance, would it, or the huge federal immigration raid not that long ago in Iowa?
  • DLS
    Of course, the immigrant ag workers might have competition, says cartoonist Horsey.


    http://www.seattlepi.com/horsey/popupV2.asp?Sub...
  • archangel
    dear DLS, I dont know about meatpacking companies now, nor the fed raid in Iowa. In those three huge waves of 'importing' human beings I referred to... thousands and thousands were transported, brought in to work the farms, fields and factories, one of the most prominent, but forgotten, taking place during WWII. Many of us were born in the US, as a result. One of the earliest 'importations' and then deportations of tens of thousands took place near the turn of the century-- after 1900. Many in the US are not aware, the southern nations have long been used as resource and dumping ground. The US history book writers left these great migrations and deportations out. Although, perhaps right now, some history books in some schools may refer to these labor/deportation matters.

    ps, thanks for posting a link to a cartoon.
  • DLS
    "thousands and thousands were transported, brought in to work the farms, fields and factories, one of the most prominent, but forgotten, taking place during WWII"

    Yes, the Bracero program.

    I grew up in California and know about not only the farm worker situation (recall Cesar Chavez) but also the sweatshops in LA (it's not only New York that's known for this).

    * * *

    "I dont know about meatpacking companies now, nor the fed raid in Iowa. In those three huge waves of 'importing' human beings I referred to"

    It was a giant fed raid. And, the meatpackers in the Midwest (not limited to Iowa) were known for years for bussing immigrants into the "factories." Slaughterhouses are also the subject of similar tales. I wouldn't be surprised if, say, the poultry operations (Tyson and such) in places like Arkansas also were doing this.
  • archangel
    Dear DLS, I do know here in the Rockies, that long ago in late 1960s when I went to do a story on a meatpacking plants' empoyees (I was looking for anyone who had craftsmanship in other areas) the majority of workers by far were from russia, ukraine, u.s., and eastern eu. (I did find my man for the story: Otto Epp, I believe his name was. He was an incredible old country woodworker of figurines. I took photos of him in his knee high rubber boots in the 'blood-flood' as they called the floor at work, and then he graciously invited me to his home and I took photos of all his incredible fairy tale carvings, and all his wife's darling offerings she made for the visit ---of every old country pastry you could think of. Just my .02... everyone who they call 'worker' or 'employee' is most often truly a rich soul in so many ways, carries so many rich stories of odd and unusual and wondrous sorrows and gifts... that can never be conveyed by calling anyone 'worker.')

    Dr.e
    You are correct re inference of squalid conditions for those imported for hard labor purposes.
  • DLS
    "the majority of workers by far were from russia, ukraine, u.s., and eastern eu"

    Interestingly enough, when I used to be in Upstate New York, that was the older history of that area.

    There was even a beautiful Ukrainian graveyard a few miles out of town. (Cyrillic on the tombstones.)

    (Because of the terrain as well as the history, I called the local area "New Carpathia.")
  • archangel
    that is a cool story, thank you DLS! "New Carpathia" ... perfect.

    dr.e
  • spirasol
    Just a fantasy, maybe even just a male comic book fantasy: So many want Pres. O to fight back. What would it have been like if O abandoned the podium, peeled off his shirt, and put up his dukes. He wins handily, then glares down the assembled crowd, "anyone else want to call me a liar? You? -he points to Grassly? You? - he points to each pouting face in the crowd. When their are no takers, he returns to the podium and gives a rousing speech.
  • archangel
    that made me laugh this morning dear spirasol. After seeing the pix of President O at the beach in Hawaii, I think you're likely right. After seeing Putin also half naked in his recent publicity photos, he just might maybe be able to take on an old communist or two himself.

    I used to have a movie running in my head when the mothers marched for recognition of the desaparacidos (those 'disappeared' by the Chilean and other SA governments, who never were returned, nor their bodies)... I wanted the Pope to march in the streets with the mothers, and Fidel and President Everybody from all the nations of the world, and then... they would all go, with all their robes and ambassadorial ribbons flying to march for peace in Palestine/Isreal, and then they would march unafraid in the streets of Kosovo and then they would march in the roads of Rwanda and... magically.... well, you know the rest... We still pray.

    On another note, I am glad to see you land on the branch again. I have noticed you were away.

    thanks S:
    dr.e
  • archangel
    Dear DLS, do you know where this is? Google maps?

    "There was even a beautiful Ukrainian graveyard a few miles out of town. (Cyrillic on the tombstones.)"

    thanks,
    dr.e
  • springfieldreformer
    Nice distraction, the picture is, from the real issue. Respect for an office is one thing. Letting a man lie unchallenged to an entire nation? Joe Wilson was under a moral imperative to protect the Presidency by rebuking the President. What? Does respect just emerge out of the ether, materialize out of thin air? Does it not have to come from some underlying substance supportable by something other than a teleprompter? Letting falsehood stand would do far more to denigrate the office than to step out of the formalities for a moment to call everyone to a higher level of honesty. It's happened to lots of good people. Uppity folks like Jesus and Paul come to mind. No, I'm not equating Wilson to those lofty persons. I'm just saying there can be nadirs of behavior so low the only respectful thing to do is call them out. Bald lies to the American people seem like the right occasion for such an action. It's really too bad Wilson was the only one in the room capable of connecting his conscience with his mouth.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC