An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Wall Street’s Odds-on-Death Panels

To balance the furor over bureaucratic boards to decide whether the aged are worth saving with medical care, the financial wizards who brought on the mortgage meltdown have figured out a way to play roulette with their chances.

Bankers, the New York Times reports, “plan to buy ‘life settlements,’ life insurance policies that ill and elderly people sell for cash–$400,000 for a $1 million policy, say, depending on the life expectancy of the insured person. Then they plan to ’securitize’ these policies, in Wall Street jargon, by packaging hundreds or thousands together into bonds. They will then resell those bonds to investors, like big pension funds, who will receive the payouts when people with the insurance die.”

Gambling with Grandma’s life expectancy is a free-market alternative to socialized euthanasia that may appeal to conservatives. They could invest in bonds that bundle policies from people with a mix of maladies–leukemia, cancer, heart disease, diabetes, Alzheimer’s–with due diligence to insure that not too many in the portfolio have an ailment for which a cure might be found. In that case, the value of the bond would collapse.

As the market develops, there could be the equivalent of socially responsible mutual funds, products that exclude those whom investors may find morally offensive such as sufferers from alcoholism or AIDS.

Yet, as in all investments, there will be risks.

MORE.

  • DLS
    Rather than demolish any more cheap shots attempted in defense of the health care effort, in denial of history, I'll just note that the bankers who may be getting involved are, interestingly, doing it during a time of expansion and revision managed by the same Dems who have revived "death panel" fears.
  • Lit3Bolt
    DLS, I'm waiting for you to denounce Republicans for their support of Medicare. Don't worry, I'll wait.
  • DLS
    "Don't worry, I'll wait."

    They're correct about the sloppiness of cram-downs on providers and looting Medicare to pretend that they're paying for the current new expansion by the Dems. That they rush to defend Medicare itself would be a hollow gesture, obviously. (Addressing intelligent people's concerns about replacing the insurers with government people with a risk of sinister care denial or rationing is not the same thing.)
  • DLS
    Incidentally, Bolt, if you're up to date on your news, you'd be aware that Nancy Pelosi was up to her old threats once again. She's the one who said that the insurers and pharma companies and others have "much more" that "they can do" in the area of being looted and subjected to cost-shifting and to price controls, etc.. Now with the public option that's in danger currently, she is showing her crazier lib Dem persona once more and saying that the insurers should be gladly willing to accept a public option now, because otherwise they're going to face a much tougher-on-them public option later.

    (As if this isn't already being anticipated and planned for by Pelosi and her crowd...)
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC