An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right
Birthers: Beyond Obama’s Deep Pockets
It you’re unhappy with the info and facts presented so far on President Barack Obama being born in the United States, why not start a new debate about…his foreskin?
h/T Hinessight
27 Responses to “Birthers: Beyond Obama’s Deep Pockets”
[...] with several national and international awards for his ability to pick insanely heavy things up. Birthers: Beyond Obama’s Deep Pockets – themoderatevoice.com 08/25/2009 It you’re unhappy with the info and facts presented so far on [...]
What shall we call this group of loonies: the “penisers?”
The obscession needs to be boosted in volume and shrillness. The health care effort continues to falter.
It seems that the right has an unhealthy obsession with Democratic presidents' penises. Panty Sniffers.
Obviously, this group of loonies should be called: the “Dick heads”
Stupid Republicans. They would argue with a brick wall for not getting out of the way.
Cute, but in the end it's really just <ahref=”http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=nutpicking”>nutpicking.
A movement is born. Deport all uncircumsized males who do not have naturalization papers.
Question: Would they be satisfied with seeing whether there is foreskin, or will they demand to see the “long form”?
What to call them: “the dangling dolts” comes to mind…but I like “dick heads” or “panty sniffers”.
This thread is giving me the willies.
sounds like circumspection to me. . .
Let's just hope this doesn't end up in another inspection of dangling chads in questioning the legitimacy of a presidential election.
“Democrats — the party of shorter, smaller hanging chads.” — Karl Rove
“Democrats, or Marxists, but I repeat myself [snicker, pause] … have no chads! HA HA HA HA [snort]“
– Glenn Beck
“Hanging chad envy, my friends!” — Rush Limbaugh.
You guys! so fast and funny! I am laughing my way through your comments. “the penisers” indeed. birthers, truthers, deathers, penisers. No no dont say it, I know, I know, the feminine has been left out. That's good. Allow it to be left out. Geez, Ionesco would be so pleased.
dr.e
It's “circumcision” not “circumspection”, and if not done “south” is usually ineffective.
OK. If the birthers are the tinfoil hat brigade these whackos are the…?
The Tin Cup brigade? (apologies to Kevin Costner and Rene Russo)
Me thinks the foreskin debate is an example of 'ASTRO-SURF' – an item pulled from the fringes of the internet realm that's been branded legitimate by a media struggling to prove its own legitimacy in the face of same said internet.
Really people…we could find an endless number of insane debates on the internet. For instance, there are people discussing whether Obama is an alien or one of the 'Annunaki' but would we think it worthwhile to comment on such outrageous speculation?
Right up there with the Trig Palin birth mother silliness.
Just ask Larry Sinclair about Obama's endowments. Larry has a really big mouth.
I remember years ago when Alex Haley's, “Roots” came out… I remember that the male kids were circumcised…..
I thought I'd check online and here's this:
http://www.bellaonline.com/articles/art7371.asp
I particularly like the last sentence in the next to the last paragraph (the last sentence in the paragraph that begins, “In 1992….”.
What would it mean in Kenya (and perhaps other areas of Africa) if Obama was uncircumcised?
Wouldn't Joe Biden be more convienient
Leonidas… I think you missed my double entendre of Larry having a really big mouth.
So no, Joe wouldn't be more convenient…. or knowledgeable.
Stockboy… I think I didn't =P
The Trig Palin conspiracy is more apparently hate-filled but analogous just the same.
Of course not, Steve. They're the tinfoil condom brigade. The little head must be protected too.