An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Uneasy with the Boeing 787 Dreamliner

Boeing has had a tough time getting the first production 787 Dreamliner planes delivered. Some of the recent problems have involved the composite materials used in the construction of the fuselage and wings.

Ordinarily, I’m all for the use of new technologies and new materials. The carbon composites being used in the 787 are significantly stronger than aluminum for the same weight, which for airplanes is a good thing. What makes me uneasy about them is how they fail. Metals like aluminum bend and eventually tear, but the failure tends to take time for the bending or tearing, while composite materials tend to fail totally, splintering or shattering when the failure point is reached. Planes made by Airbus with composite materials forming the tails have had issues that appear to be related to how the composite materials fail.

While I know the FAA certification process is very thorough, I’m still not certain I’d like to fly on a 787. I hope I’m not turning into a luddite

Technorati : , , ,
Del.icio.us : , , ,
Zooomr : , , ,
Flickr : , , ,

  • Hi Jack - good to hear from you again
    I think this opens up a lot of questions. While Al may fail slowly the results can be catatrophic. The 737 has many decompresion compresion cycles because of the nature of it's short flights. Are there really inspections that can avoid the catastrophic failure in Hawaii a few years ago? There have been problems with the lot of the old McDonald Douglas aircraft recently. Is it because they are no longer receiving the proper support from Boeing or just because they are old?
    Boeing seems to be running the the 787 through all the right tests. When they engineer it to pass the tests should I be anymore insecure about it than a 10+ year old 737 or MD-7?
  • AustinRoth
    I had the same initial fears about twin-engine jets being certified for trans-Atlantic and trans-Pacific crossings, and fly-by-wire, too. After a couple flights on each, you just stop thinking about it.
  • AustinRoth
    A 10 year old 737 would actually be young!
  • Father_Time
    Ron Beasley--

    The 737 was put through "all the right tests" also. Your worry is ageing aircraft. Yes the 737 that turned into a convertible could have been prevented by actually inspecting and replacing the corroded bell formers as called out in the aircraft's C & D checks. MD aircraft get proper support from Boeing, it's just their owners are to cheap to maintain them right.

    Whats an MD-7??
  • Father_Time
    AustinRoth-- [A 10 year old 737 would actually be young!]

    Depends on airframe hours in service. Years are a practically irrelevant.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC