An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

A Little Self-Responsibility, Please

I wouldn’t go as far as comic/satirist Bill Maher saying the American public is stupid. Rather, a large percentage is gullible as we have seen time and again on the town hall video clips Congressmen are conducting this August recess.

Wrote Maher in The Huffington Post:

I’m the bad guy for saying it’s a stupid country, yet polls show that a majority of Americans cannot name a single branch of government, or explain what the Bill of Rights is. Twenty-four percent could not name the country America fought in the Revolutionary War. More than two-thirds of Americans don’t know what’s in Roe v. Wade. Two-thirds don’t know what the Food and Drug Administration does.

What I see in what is wistfully described as a health care reform debate is a bunch of angry old white men and women passionately defending the Medicare benefits they believe they are entitled. Your guess is as good as mine how they reached that conclusion.

One piece of evidence is a draft bill in Congress that would reduce $2 billion in Medicare “savings” and shift it to MediCaid.

Not to worry, soothes President Barack Obama at his Portsmouth, New Hampshire, hearing earlier this week. The AARP endorses the administration’s plans for health reform, he claimed.

Naught!

The president was politely repudiated by AARP executives, saying the 40-million members have not judged the plans as of yet but its top brass is working closely on the issue with the White House.

If you can’t believe Obama, whom do you trust? I would offer no one, based on the fragmentation of the proposed legislation now in both houses of Congress.

I would take this a step further. I wouldn’t trust the outcome of the AARP member polling if the sentiment is close to that we have seen at the town hall meetings. These are the activists, the loud mouths, the ones driven by fear and passion. They are the ones responding to the polls in greater numbers than those whose minds are still open or undecided. Old people are leery of change and are driven to oppose something just like the rest of the population than rising up to challenge the world of health care delivery as we know it.

I’ll take it another step. One of the cornerstones of the Obama health reform plan is to offer no copay for preventive medicine screening. That sounds good but will people who will benefit most — the young and indestructible — actually partake. The verdict is inconclusive.

It goes to the heart of the problem. That is the American people must take responsibility for their own welfare and stop passing the costs onto others whether covered by government or private insurance.

The health insurance industry is opposed saying some health experts caution that not all preventive services have been proven to save lives, and even fewer can limit health spending. Kaiser Health Plan advocates report:

“In the field of prevention, few areas save a lot of lives and money,” Dr. Barnett Kramer, associate director for disease prevention at the National Institutes of Health, said in an interview. While most childhood immunizations and smoking cessation programs are cost-efficient, the answer is less clear for screenings for breast and cervical cancer, he said. He stressed that screening tests such as these can still be worthwhile in saving lives, even though they may not save money over the long run.

It points out a Congressional Budget Office analysis of the House bill that the removal of copayments and deductibles will cost Medicare $2.8 billion and Medicaid $7.1 billion over the next 10 years.

Under the House plan, patients could receive free an initial physical exam, diabetes screening tests, blood tests for heart disease, mammography, pap smears, bone mass measurements, flu and pneumonia vaccines, screenings for colon and rectal cancer, and ultrasound screenings for abdominal aortic aneurysm.

The Kaiser report did have the honesty of reporting a Brown University study that the number of women receiving free mammograms fell 8% when they had to pay $12 for screening. Some insurance carriers such as Aetna introduced plans for small employers this year for no copay preventive routine physicals, vision and gynecological exams in addition to well-child visits.

America’s Health Insurance Plans, the industry’s top lobbying group, opposes the mandate. Spokesman Robert Zirkelbach cited the need to give insurers flexibility in designing benefit packages.

With child obesity and juvenile diabetes becoming close to epidemic proportions, even the most jaundiced observer would agree that early childhood screening and prevention would save billions of dollars in disease-related heart, circulatory, lung and kidney ailments sometimes requiring amputation of one’s feet.

But these so-called free preventive programs don’t do a damned bit of good of the patient doesn’t take responsibility for himself.

  • DaGoat
    With child obesity and juvenile diabetes becoming close to epidemic proportions, even the most jaundiced observer would agree that early childhood screening and prevention would save billions of dollars in disease-related heart, circulatory, lung and kidney ailments sometimes requiring amputation of one’s feet.

    I must be incredibly jaundiced then. Preventive medicine is great, it prolongs lives and improves quality of life. What it doesn't do is save money.

    Your example of juvenile diabetes isn't a good one - juvenile diabetes is almost always a failure of the pancreas to produce insulin and not related to obesity. It is thought to be genetic with a possible viral trigger.

    What you are really talking about is prevention of type 2 diabetes, which is often related to obesity. Should we screen for it and counsel kids about obesity - sure but it will be expensive. The blood work, doctor's appointments and dietary counseling will cost a lot today. It might save us some money when these kids get into their 50's but I don't think the data is there to support this as a cost-saving measure.

    The other problem is that obesity counseling in kids, like obesity counseling in adults, doesn't have a great success rate. It's really tough to change patterns that have been learned over years and often the results of the parent's lifestyle which they have no desire to change.

    Don't get me wrong - preventive medicine is great for many reasons and I support it but with few exceptions will not save money.
  • DLS
    "Preventive medicine is great, it prolongs lives and improves quality of life. What it doesn't do is save money."

    In fact, many preventive measures that have long been identified as useful have not been routinely used because they are not cost-effective.

    More to the point insofar as silly activism goes, the preventive care issue is vastly overblown, routinely is accompanied by a presumption that it is magical, and in the real world, not only does it bloat the cost of pre-paid health care or "insurance" (many state minimum benefit packages are responsible for the high costs due to the elaborate set of benefits that are required), but so often, those who most need it never use it even when it is available or offered to them. Or as was asked:

    "will people who will benefit most — the young and indestructible — actually partake"

    No, though they aren't the group that illustrates the most important part of the problem. However, it's worth revisiting this segment because they are so often actually the typical case for those without health insurance. (They decline to buy it, preferring to spend the money on other things; they believe they are indestructible, yes.)

    * * *

    As to the current hype about obesity ("the obesity crisis" and other such ridiculousness), it's a shame that so many people become so childishly emotional and irrational. (And as to their childishness, how many of them want the federal government once more to be their parent and to direct everyone's lives?)

    * * *

    To correct misstatements that begin this thread: The notoriously gullible segment of the public is not what Maher dishonestly portrays, or others dishonestly portrary, but of course those who still are in the silly swooning honeymoon with Obama even after the antics with the climate bill and now with health care -- the flaky fringists who say typical tripe such as "health care is a 'right'," who childishly agree we need to rush stupidly to do whatever the Dems say we have to, NOW!, and who can be still plucked from the low tail of the bell curve and reliably exploited in Obama's staged town hall campaign circus appearances.
  • DLS
    Side note -- there's not only the pushing of PC-approved behavior at stake here, but punishing the bad or PC-unapproved behavior as well.

    (I like one of the reader remarks -- but isn't this a violation of the "right" to health care?)

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-42487...
  • bill117
    So people who believe health care is a human right are gullible? All of Europe, for example?

    Those who think global warming is a problem that needs to be addressed are gullible? That list includes over 100,000 scientists in climate related fields.

    Perhaps you are the gullible one, attacking anything Obama does because he is a Democrat? I voted Republican my entire life until Bush came along, and am proud of the fact that I have been able to judge politicians and issues on the merits rather than on the team uniforms. Perhaps you need to start doing the same.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC