
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Washington Post Pulls Plug On Dana Milbank Chris Cillizza &#8220;Comedy&#8221; Videos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/42104/washington-post-pulls-plug-on-dana-milbank-chris-cillizza-comedy-videos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/42104/washington-post-pulls-plug-on-dana-milbank-chris-cillizza-comedy-videos/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 20:30:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jillmz</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/42104/washington-post-pulls-plug-on-dana-milbank-chris-cillizza-comedy-videos/comment-page-1/#comment-199976</link>
		<dc:creator>Jillmz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 17:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=42104#comment-199976</guid>
		<description>A big chunk of the Kurtz piece also tells of how this action came in response to a letter sent and signed by 32 women in the media orgs and individuals - myself included - protesting the sexism AND the tastelessness of the skit:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;In a letter to Brauchli on Tuesday that was signed by 32 women, the organization Women, Action and the Media demanded an explanation for what it called &quot;the video&#039;s patently sexist -- and otherwise tasteless -- content,&quot; which the writers said displayed &quot;misogyny&quot; and &quot;utter contempt for women&quot; as well as racial insensitivity.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Although the scripts for &quot;Mouthpiece Theater&quot; were approved by editors, Milbank and Cillizza often ad-libbed parts of it, as was the case with the inclusion of Clinton&#039;s photo. &quot;We did not have an effective system for vetting videos and other multimedia content,&quot; Brauchli said, insisting that will change. He said the paper will keep experimenting with new media but that &quot;we need to hold ourselves to our standards to deliver that.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And Milbank, who still needs lessons in Sexism 101 and How to Apologize 101, lays blame at us brutal bloggers and the woes of being &quot;high-profile targets:&quot; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;...Both men, who frequently appear on television, became high-profile targets, particularly among left-leaning bloggers but also on such outlets as Twitter.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;&quot;It&#039;s a brutal world out there in the blogosphere,&quot; Milbank said. &quot;I&#039;m often surprised by the ferocity out there, but I probably shouldn&#039;t be.&quot;&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Frankly, it&#039;s almost like the media blaming the media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A big chunk of the Kurtz piece also tells of how this action came in response to a letter sent and signed by 32 women in the media orgs and individuals &#8211; myself included &#8211; protesting the sexism AND the tastelessness of the skit:</p>
<p>&#8220;In a letter to Brauchli on Tuesday that was signed by 32 women, the organization Women, Action and the Media demanded an explanation for what it called &#8220;the video&#39;s patently sexist &#8212; and otherwise tasteless &#8212; content,&#8221; which the writers said displayed &#8220;misogyny&#8221; and &#8220;utter contempt for women&#8221; as well as racial insensitivity.</p>
<p>&#8220;Although the scripts for &#8220;Mouthpiece Theater&#8221; were approved by editors, Milbank and Cillizza often ad-libbed parts of it, as was the case with the inclusion of Clinton&#39;s photo. &#8220;We did not have an effective system for vetting videos and other multimedia content,&#8221; Brauchli said, insisting that will change. He said the paper will keep experimenting with new media but that &#8220;we need to hold ourselves to our standards to deliver that.&#8221;</p>
<p>And Milbank, who still needs lessons in Sexism 101 and How to Apologize 101, lays blame at us brutal bloggers and the woes of being &#8220;high-profile targets:&#8221; </p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;Both men, who frequently appear on television, became high-profile targets, particularly among left-leaning bloggers but also on such outlets as Twitter.</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8221;It&#39;s a brutal world out there in the blogosphere,&#8221; Milbank said. &#8220;I&#39;m often surprised by the ferocity out there, but I probably shouldn&#39;t be.&#8221;"</p>
<p>Frankly, it&#39;s almost like the media blaming the media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveK</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/42104/washington-post-pulls-plug-on-dana-milbank-chris-cillizza-comedy-videos/comment-page-1/#comment-199466</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 16:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=42104#comment-199466</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;jwest wrote: &quot;I’ve just seen on a different website that Obama’s approval rating has dropped to 50%.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;What a coincidence jwest... &quot;I’ve just seen on a different website that&quot; the Republican Parties approval rating has dropped to 15%... You gotta love the value of unnamed websites!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here&#039;s some actual data... from a known and respected website, &lt;a href=&quot;http://pollster.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;pollster.com&lt;/a&gt;. Their compilation of all the major polls says that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pollster.com/polls/us/jobapproval-obama.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Obama&#039;s &lt;i&gt;average&lt;/i&gt; Approval Rating is currently at 52.3 %&lt;br&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;National Job Approval: Barack Obama&lt;br&gt;Pollster ....... Dates ..... N/Pop ... Approve . Disapprove . Undecided&lt;br&gt;Rasmussen .... 8/3-5/09 ... 1500 LV .... 49 ....... 51 ......... -&lt;br&gt;Gallup ....... 8/2-4/09 ... 1500 A ..... 56 ....... 37 ......... -&lt;br&gt;Zogby ...... 7/31-8/4/09 .. 1005 LV .... 53 ....... 38 ......... -&lt;br&gt;Gallup ..... 7/31-8/3/09 .. 1136 A ..... 56 ....... 40 ......... 4&lt;/blockquote&gt;Considering the distorted half truths, mischaracterizations and blatant lies being directed at the White House and the Democrats in congress by the health care / health insurance industries these lower numbers should come as no surprise.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Keep up the good work though jwest... at least Rasmussen&#039;s on your side. Seems you two are running neck-and-neck in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pollster.com/blogs/poll_of_pollsters_rating_the_i.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;accuracy in polling&lt;/a&gt; (position?) game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>jwest wrote: &#8220;I’ve just seen on a different website that Obama’s approval rating has dropped to 50%.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>What a coincidence jwest&#8230; &#8220;I’ve just seen on a different website that&#8221; the Republican Parties approval rating has dropped to 15%&#8230; You gotta love the value of unnamed websites!</p>
<p>Here&#39;s some actual data&#8230; from a known and respected website, <a href="http://pollster.com" rel="nofollow">pollster.com</a>. Their compilation of all the major polls says that <a href="http://www.pollster.com/polls/us/jobapproval-obama.php" rel="nofollow">Obama&#39;s <i>average</i> Approval Rating is currently at 52.3 %<br /></a><br />
<blockquote>National Job Approval: Barack Obama<br />Pollster &#8230;&#8230;. Dates &#8230;.. N/Pop &#8230; Approve . Disapprove . Undecided<br />Rasmussen &#8230;. 8/3-5/09 &#8230; 1500 LV &#8230;. 49 &#8230;&#8230;. 51 &#8230;&#8230;&#8230; -<br />Gallup &#8230;&#8230;. 8/2-4/09 &#8230; 1500 A &#8230;.. 56 &#8230;&#8230;. 37 &#8230;&#8230;&#8230; -<br />Zogby &#8230;&#8230; 7/31-8/4/09 .. 1005 LV &#8230;. 53 &#8230;&#8230;. 38 &#8230;&#8230;&#8230; -<br />Gallup &#8230;.. 7/31-8/3/09 .. 1136 A &#8230;.. 56 &#8230;&#8230;. 40 &#8230;&#8230;&#8230; 4</p></blockquote>
<p>Considering the distorted half truths, mischaracterizations and blatant lies being directed at the White House and the Democrats in congress by the health care / health insurance industries these lower numbers should come as no surprise.</p>
<p>Keep up the good work though jwest&#8230; at least Rasmussen&#39;s on your side. Seems you two are running neck-and-neck in the <a href="http://www.pollster.com/blogs/poll_of_pollsters_rating_the_i.php" rel="nofollow">accuracy in polling</a> (position?) game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaGoat</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/42104/washington-post-pulls-plug-on-dana-milbank-chris-cillizza-comedy-videos/comment-page-1/#comment-199440</link>
		<dc:creator>DaGoat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 15:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=42104#comment-199440</guid>
		<description>Milbank and Cillizza weren&#039;t funny and their videos deserved to die.  But let&#039;s face it, the plug was pulled not because they weren&#039;t funny but because they insulted a liberal icon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Milbank and Cillizza weren&#39;t funny and their videos deserved to die.  But let&#39;s face it, the plug was pulled not because they weren&#39;t funny but because they insulted a liberal icon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwest</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/42104/washington-post-pulls-plug-on-dana-milbank-chris-cillizza-comedy-videos/comment-page-1/#comment-199422</link>
		<dc:creator>jwest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 14:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=42104#comment-199422</guid>
		<description>Off Topic………&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Joe,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I’ve just seen on a different website that Obama’s approval rating has dropped to 50%.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Didn’t you used to follow polls?  I seem to remember headlines for every quarter-point drop Bush suffered. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for keeping us on top of the Milbank/Cillizza situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Off Topic………</p>
<p>Joe,</p>
<p>I’ve just seen on a different website that Obama’s approval rating has dropped to 50%.</p>
<p>Didn’t you used to follow polls?  I seem to remember headlines for every quarter-point drop Bush suffered. </p>
<p>Thanks for keeping us on top of the Milbank/Cillizza situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RememebrNovember</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/42104/washington-post-pulls-plug-on-dana-milbank-chris-cillizza-comedy-videos/comment-page-1/#comment-199412</link>
		<dc:creator>RememebrNovember</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 14:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=42104#comment-199412</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t find it particularly funny. Perfect for SNL though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#39;t find it particularly funny. Perfect for SNL though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: archangel</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/42104/washington-post-pulls-plug-on-dana-milbank-chris-cillizza-comedy-videos/comment-page-1/#comment-199365</link>
		<dc:creator>archangel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 08:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=42104#comment-199365</guid>
		<description>you know, Mssr&#039;s Cillizza and Milbank were pretty brave to try something new. They&#039;re creative and sometimes taking up another medium seems easy to master. But there&#039;s this oddity about painting, writing, journalism, performance... audiences sort of niche the artist and dont particularly like it when an artist acts like an artist and takes on multiple mediums. They dont want to see Letterman do serious news. THey likely wouldnt liked to have seen venerable Cronkite do a weekly oleo. It&#039;s an odd thing, almost as though people fall in love with you &#039;as you used to be&#039; when they first met you... &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;anyway, these two guys will wobble through this and go on having weathered this. All of us who perform on stage have our stories about an act or two we did that later was one of those, &quot;how did I ever go temporarily insane like that and how come no one came after me with the hook immediately&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I could see our two guys, Cillizza and Milbank, however, reprising on SNL. Look out... &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dr. Estes&lt;br&gt;assistant editor TMV</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you know, Mssr&#39;s Cillizza and Milbank were pretty brave to try something new. They&#39;re creative and sometimes taking up another medium seems easy to master. But there&#39;s this oddity about painting, writing, journalism, performance&#8230; audiences sort of niche the artist and dont particularly like it when an artist acts like an artist and takes on multiple mediums. They dont want to see Letterman do serious news. THey likely wouldnt liked to have seen venerable Cronkite do a weekly oleo. It&#39;s an odd thing, almost as though people fall in love with you &#39;as you used to be&#39; when they first met you&#8230; </p>
<p>anyway, these two guys will wobble through this and go on having weathered this. All of us who perform on stage have our stories about an act or two we did that later was one of those, &#8220;how did I ever go temporarily insane like that and how come no one came after me with the hook immediately&#8221;</p>
<p>I could see our two guys, Cillizza and Milbank, however, reprising on SNL. Look out&#8230; </p>
<p>Dr. Estes<br />assistant editor TMV</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

