<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Art Of Stealing The Other Guy&#8217;s Property</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/41671/the-art-of-stealing-the-other-guys-property/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/41671/the-art-of-stealing-the-other-guys-property/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 03:41:53 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave_Schuler</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/41671/the-art-of-stealing-the-other-guys-property/comment-page-1/#comment-198435</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave_Schuler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 14:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=41671#comment-198435</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;re giving Mr. Shapira far too much credit, Jerry.  He&#039;s claiming a right to much, much more than is covered by copyright or under the laws and conventions against plagiarism.  He&#039;s claiming to own the ideas contained in the material.  The complaint about Gawker isn&#039;t that it quoted without citation but that it used the ideas.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The ideas and knowledge don&#039;t belong to the author.  They are not covered by copyright.  Authors who don&#039;t want their ideas replayed and reused should stop writing &lt;b&gt;now&lt;/b&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Books, poems, stories, articles, and so on may be copyrighted and those rights belong to the author.  The ideas in the books, poems, stories, articles, and so on &lt;b&gt;go into the public domain&lt;/b&gt;.  Authors who claim otherwise are pirates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#39;re giving Mr. Shapira far too much credit, Jerry.  He&#39;s claiming a right to much, much more than is covered by copyright or under the laws and conventions against plagiarism.  He&#39;s claiming to own the ideas contained in the material.  The complaint about Gawker isn&#39;t that it quoted without citation but that it used the ideas.</p>
<p>The ideas and knowledge don&#39;t belong to the author.  They are not covered by copyright.  Authors who don&#39;t want their ideas replayed and reused should stop writing <b>now</b>.</p>
<p>Books, poems, stories, articles, and so on may be copyrighted and those rights belong to the author.  The ideas in the books, poems, stories, articles, and so on <b>go into the public domain</b>.  Authors who claim otherwise are pirates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThurmanHart</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/41671/the-art-of-stealing-the-other-guys-property/comment-page-1/#comment-198368</link>
		<dc:creator>ThurmanHart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 23:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=41671#comment-198368</guid>
		<description>I do a good bit of writing on the internet.  I&#039;ve even managed to get paid for some of it (and managed to sell a few ads on my own sites).  I don&#039;t mind if someone uses my words or expands on my thoughts so long as they link back to me - though a mention of my name is always nice.  But a link is a de facto citation of where the words/ideas come from.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On the other hand, I&#039;ve issued a number of Cease and Desist orders to websites that simply ripped off my RSS feeds and published them in their entirety.  I&#039;ve even done this with sites that mentioned my name.  It&#039;s one thing to take an idea or a few words and then add content to and around them.  It&#039;s another thing to simply take someone else&#039;s work and try to make money from it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do a good bit of writing on the internet.  I&#39;ve even managed to get paid for some of it (and managed to sell a few ads on my own sites).  I don&#39;t mind if someone uses my words or expands on my thoughts so long as they link back to me &#8211; though a mention of my name is always nice.  But a link is a de facto citation of where the words/ideas come from.</p>
<p>On the other hand, I&#39;ve issued a number of Cease and Desist orders to websites that simply ripped off my RSS feeds and published them in their entirety.  I&#39;ve even done this with sites that mentioned my name.  It&#39;s one thing to take an idea or a few words and then add content to and around them.  It&#39;s another thing to simply take someone else&#39;s work and try to make money from it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joeinhell</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/41671/the-art-of-stealing-the-other-guys-property/comment-page-1/#comment-198365</link>
		<dc:creator>joeinhell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 23:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=41671#comment-198365</guid>
		<description>All &quot;news&quot; papers are a waste of good trees.  There are no GOOD  &quot;news&quot;papers.  There are only second rate pieces of shit that are shilling for their owners viewpoint.  Since all but one &quot;news&quot;paper is owned by right wing Merchants of Death, that have taken for their own viewpoints the vapid shit, Any Rand.  Stop wasting trees, boycott newspapers. Get a real job where you can report &quot;news&quot; without the censoring of the MSM, or just quit.  Get a job planting trees, not much pay, but not enough to repay the earth and its people for the trees wasted on your bullshit.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Die newspapers die.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All &#8220;news&#8221; papers are a waste of good trees.  There are no GOOD  &#8220;news&#8221;papers.  There are only second rate pieces of shit that are shilling for their owners viewpoint.  Since all but one &#8220;news&#8221;paper is owned by right wing Merchants of Death, that have taken for their own viewpoints the vapid shit, Any Rand.  Stop wasting trees, boycott newspapers. Get a real job where you can report &#8220;news&#8221; without the censoring of the MSM, or just quit.  Get a job planting trees, not much pay, but not enough to repay the earth and its people for the trees wasted on your bullshit.</p>
<p>Die newspapers die.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
