An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

“Ox” Barack Obama Offers A “New Deal”

ox_barack_obama_2.jpg

In Chinese astrology 2009 is the “Year of the Ox”. Only that person or a nation, it is said, would remain unscathed if it works its backside off this year. US president Barack Obama was born in the “Year of the Ox”, and his nose is tied to the grindstone. But he might just work out some miracles…provided his countrymen share his burden instead of nitpicking.

Among various alternatives for economic stimulus and stabilization in the financial crisis-ridden USA, the Obama administration and the Congress have begun to support a major public works initiative with particular emphasis on addressing America’s dire infrastructure crisis involving bridges, urban utilities, railways and public transportation.

President Obama has pledged $13 billion to ‘jump-start’ a high-speed rail system, says The Week. On a trip to France this spring, Obama said he was ‘jealous’ of French trains, which move passengers at speeds in excess of 200 miles per hour.

(America’s romance with the railways began 140 years go when The First Transcontinental Railroad was completed in 1869. By linking with the existing railway network of the Eastern United States, the road thus connected the Atlantic and Pacific coasts by rail for the first time.)

“Indeed, high-speed rail travel in Europe is now so fast, convenient, and comfortable that it has largely supplanted air travel between Madrid and Barcelona and between Paris and Lyon. ‘In any coherent world, using airplanes to fly 300 miles makes absolutely no sense at all,’ says former Massachusetts Gov. Michael Dukakis, a onetime board member of Amtrak.

“A European-style high-speed rail system in the U.S. would mean travelers could make the 350-mile trip from Los Angeles to San Francisco in just two hours and 40 minutes. Such a system, advocates say, would be an economic boon, spurring travel and commerce among several cities positioned along a string of prospective rail ‘corridors.’

Where would those corridors be? “The Transportation Department has identified 10 regions it deems ripe for a rail renaissance. These include Florida (Orlando-Tampa-Miami) and the ‘Chicago Hub Network,’ which consists of Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Louis, and nine other Midwest cities.

“Notably absent is the nation’s most heavily trafficked train route, the Northeast Corridor from Boston to Washington, where existing infrastructure, steep grades, and winding track cannot accommodate high speeds. But none of the states along the proposed corridors appears ready to supply the enormous funds necessary to build high-speed lines, and the federal government’s slated contributions fall woefully short.

How much would this cost?

“As much as $100 billion, perhaps more. As a sort of down payment, President Obama earmarked $8 billion for high-speed rail in this year’s stimulus package and committed the feds to another $1 billion a year over the next five years. The House has added another $4 billion.

“But that’s merely a fraction of the cost of just one line; the proposed high-speed line linking Los Angeles and San Francisco, for instance, is expected to cost $34 billion. Advocates point out that the
U.S. has invested $1.8 trillion in highways and aviation over the past 60 years, so it’s not as if the alternatives are cheap.

“Skeptics such as Sam Staley of the libertarian Reason Foundation warn that high-speed rail could be ‘a black hole for government finance.’ But if high-speed trains ever get beyond the drawing board, they’ll probably do so first in California.

“Because California transit experts have been working for years on a high-speed rail plan, and last November voters approved a $10 billion bond referendum to begin funding it.

Is this an environmental issue?

“Absolutely. Transportation currently accounts for 70 percent of the oil we consume, and contributes 28 percent of the nation’s greenhouse gas emissions…..Intercity passenger rail service consumes a third less energy per passenger mile than automotive travel.

“Indeed, the White House estimates that if all 10 proposed high-speed corridors come to fruition, together they would reduce annual CO2 production by 3 million tons. Obama insists that achieving such results is a realistic goal. ‘It is happening right now. It’s been happening for decades,’ he said. ‘The problem is, it’s been happening elsewhere—not here’.”

More here…

Here is an interesting site discussing various issues related to Light rail…Please click here…

It seems that in the coming months/years if the bus and train combo continue to provide cheaper and comfortable travel many well-to-do people might also opt for public transportation. My earlier post here….

In another post I quoted Michael Moore: “Don’t put another $30 billion into the coffers of GM to build cars. Instead, use that money to keep the current workforce — and most of those who have been laid off — employed so that they can build the new modes of 21st century transportation. Let them start the conversion work now.

“Announce that we will have bullet trains criss-crossing this country in the next five years. Japan is celebrating the 45th anniversary of its first bullet train this year. Now they have dozens of them. Average speed: 165 mph. Average time a train is late: under 30 seconds. They have had these high speed trains for nearly five decades — and we don’t even have one!

“The fact that the technology already exists for us to go from New York to L.A. in 17 hours by train, and that we haven’t used it, is criminal. Let’s hire the unemployed to build the new high speed lines all over the country. Chicago to Detroit in less than two hours. Miami to DC in under 7 hours. Denver to Dallas in five and a half. This can be done and done now.

“Initiate a program to put light rail mass transit lines in all our large and medium-sized cities. Build those trains in the GM factories. And hire local people everywhere to install and run this system. For people in rural areas not served by the train lines, have the GM plants produce energy efficient clean buses.

“For the time being, have some factories build hybrid or all-electric cars (and batteries). It will take a few years for people to get used to the new ways to transport ourselves, so if we’re going to have automobiles, let’s have kinder, gentler ones.

“Transform some of the empty GM factories to facilities that build windmills, solar panels and other means of alternate forms of energy. We need tens of millions of solar panels right now. And there is an eager and skilled workforce who can build them.

“Provide tax incentives for those who travel by hybrid car or bus or train. Also, credits for those who convert their home to alternative energy.

“To help pay for this, impose a two-dollar tax on every gallon of gasoline. This will get people to switch to more energy saving cars or to use the new rail lines and rail cars the former autoworkers have built for them.”

More here…

You like the photo above? Visit the website here…

Want more info about rail transport…Pl click here…

  • Silhouette
    If the idea is saving the US oil consumption I've got a better idea which may be cheaper. Los Angeles. We had the unpleasant experience of passing through that black hole of commuter waste this Summer on vacation. The highways there are not only dangerous to navigate the packed five or six lanes of high speed maniacs at any hour of any day, they also have to be sucking our oil at a phenominal rate. If you were to perch yourself over the 405 for instance and log how many cars go flying by on any given day [God help you on a week day between 6AM and 9PM], you would be stunned at the waste.

    And yet just saunter down to Dizzyland in Anaslime and there you will behold Walt Disney's tribute to his hope for the future of LA's nightmare, the monorail. We were in Seattle a few years back and rode their monorail. Zip Zip Zip on a quiet and pleasant elevated rail platform we went from area to area. It can be done. In SoCal the sun never stops shining, almost never. I can see solar panels on top of the rail cars feeding energy into the electric system as they zip huge numbers of people all over the cancerous sprawl day after endless day.

    You want to do a massive demo project to show the People that a bigger rail idea will save our country? Start with LA. I'd be willing to bet that that city consumes more oil than several States combined each day. Put an elevated monorail in the median of every highway there. Los Angelians will think its another ride at a theme park. The idea might take off as kids start begging their parents to go for a ride just once.
  • DLS
    As someone grounded in the real world as well as a California native who spent seven years in LA metro, I can correct Silhouette. Stimulus money in LA should in large part first be directed where it belongs in other places: Road and bridge repair, as well as in new highway projects. For decades LA has still needed at least two major new freeways (39 and Slauson-or-Century extension eastward to Santa Ana Canyon and the 91) as well as other shorter freeway segments to complete and fill in gaps in the network.

    I doubt, given California's silly politics in Sacramento, things will improve or be corrected any time soon. This is a state which failed to do something long ago it should have done, develop (enable and permit to be developed) a new national-class, additional super-major, metro encompassing the Monterey Bay area.

    High speed rail (which actually has been the subject of a state study and weakly intended project someday) is overrated by the unrealistic in this country, though it _is_ applicable to Cailfornia (connecting the developed Southland with the Bay Area) -- high-speed rail is a _regional_ concept in the USA, and intra-California travel is among a population so large as to constitute a region within itself, size-wise.

    With rail, it would be much more practical and realistic to begin soon with providing stimulus money in the Bay Area for the long-overdue Southern Crossing, then possibly converting some of the Bay Bridge's lower deck back to rail use. (Could include high-speed rail someday.) It wouldn't even need government money to set up a Talgo or similar trainset between LA and Las Vegas once the economy has recovered; and on the existing trains, why not improve them by awarding private food and drink concessions on the Southern California trains (San Diegans and Santa Barbara extensions), including my favorite In-N-Out Burger or even Hooters (also on any new LA-Las Vegas train)?
  • DLS
    Silhouette, the monorail is one idea for metro transit, not inter-city transportation. (High-speed rail is not a coast-to-coast thing in the USA or Canada, anyway, but merely a regional concept given the distances involved and relatively low population distribution; maglev is ages in the future, if ever a real possibility.)

    The Disneyland monorail or the Alweg in Seattle (yes, I've ridden these, too, when living in both places) may be an example for future metro area transit systems, though they're expensive (as was BART in the Bay Area) and improving bus service would no doubt be more practical, especially for stimulus moneys.

    By the way, Silhouette, not only does BART go along freeway medians in the Bay Area, but there's also such a case in LA with its rail transport line (in particular, the Green Line). Of course, I'm willing to ride transit through gangsta land (South Central; the Blue Line) and not everyone else is so willing to do this. Were you aware that LA has rail transit already, including among freeway medians?

    http://metro.net/riding_metro/maps/images/rail_...

    Of course, automobility and the personal freedom (individual liberty) it confers and supports is as preferred to collective transport in LA as it is elsewhere in the USA and the rest of the world where people can afford it. It's no surprise that an early (initial) Kia commercial playing in LA when I was there predictably showed a young woman driving parallel to a transit line and (again, _predictably_) making a right-angle (90-degree, the obviously illustrative choice) turn away from transit when she wanted to turn away from it.
  • DLS
    Swaraaj, the "dreams" of Michael Moore and innumerable other lefties are, and have been, merely dreams.

    Nobody wants to be forced (which would be needed not only in the USA but in any other nation that has advanced in its development, which will then involve mass _automobility_) into collective transport against their will. The naive faith (which is old and stale as of now, you realize) in "alternative energy" is just that, naive; not only are wind and solar _not_ clean in their creation and production of infrastructure, but they are often impratical or useless (not limited only to those times when the sun is not shining or the wind is not blowing). These are even more compounded (already here, in the case of wind) by conflicts between proponents of these sources and the nature of the sites or nearby owners (locations near state parks as well as NIMBY neighborhoods). It's as naive as in the Seattle plan some years ago for a monorail system or light rail in various metro areas here, along with the naive or impractical expectations of those who are fans like me of high-speed rail, but who are naive or ignorant about the reality of our continent here, etc.

    Interestingly, you in India have not only a still-developing population that isn't yet a mature automotive market and which involves a geographical size that may support high-speed rail throughout your country.

    But note that even in India, there's built-up demand and future expectations of automobiles, especially small, cheap automobiles that are affordable. (The USA needs a $5,000 automobile right now!)
  • DLS
    Swaraaj, light rail is the darling of lefties and activists here in the USA. These things are overrated (as modern-day techno-toys, as well as the object of unrealistic expectations of people foregoing autos for collective transport).

    But I can think of one thing that's actually even less practical on its face -- a monorail system -- that _is_ used, quite heavily (as I noted during a recent sports event) and which should be considered for extending where a light rail is being currently sought: the People Mover in Detroit along Woodward Avenue (which is a rare, _heavily_ used, transport corridor in Detroit metro).

    [Any Woodward Avenue or similar extension could be at ground level, if need be, to reduce costs.]

    http://www.thepeoplemover.com/WE-LL-TAKE-YOU-TH...

    http://www.woodwardlightrail.com/Home.html


    Also, I've been on the record before and am on it here once again as supporting a "stimulus" grant to New York City to spend money specifically on a new subway project that makes perfect sense there, and has long been identified as useful and desireable, and a dream there that completes the subway system there -- the Second Avenue Subway. "Just Do it, Now." We should boost the current effort to do this.

    http://www.mta.info/capconstr/sas/index.html
  • lexslamman
    People don't have to be 'forced' into public mass transit. Most people living in cities end up overwhelmingly choosing it over the misery of wasting hours in traffic and hard earned money on gasoline. Before Firestone and GM conspired to shut down urban transit, especially in southern California, there was serious doubt as to whether our current 'automobile culture' would ever become the norm. I suggest studying the 'Great American Streetcar Scandal'

    http://www.almankoff.com/0322scandal.shtml

    The point is in areas where rail transportation has been susbidized and supported, even on a shoestring budget with little amenities, people use it in droves and business booms along the corridors it creates. It is the wisest investment in our tax dollars this government has come up with in over 8 years.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC