An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Obama And Biden Are Seeding A New “Cool War” With Russia

Even as he asserts his desire to reset relations with Russia in a positive direction, President Barack Obama is sowing early seeds for a new Cool War if not Cold War with Russia and its satellites.

The latest act was Vice President Joe Biden’s clear and full backing to Georgia, which is being interpreted there and in East and Central European capitals as an informal military guarantee of protection against Russian aggression.

The specter of Cool War lurks in Biden’s repeated promise of full support for a “united Georgia” and its territorial integrity as an undivided country. Biden also pledged perpetual American refusal to recognize Abkhazia and South Ossetia as independent States.

Yet, as Biden told the Georgians, there can be no military option. In non-American eyes, that makes Biden’s full support for a “secure, free, democratic and once again united Georgia” dangerous rhetoric.

Whatever Washington might say, Abkhazia and South Ossetia cannot be reunited with Georgia without a war. Biden’s words create uncertainty, and therefore instability, in relations between Washington and Moscow and could fuel hard-line hostility on both sides.

Moscow quickly threw down the gauntlet. Russia’s Deputy Foreign Minister Grigory Karasin said Moscow will take “concrete measures” to prevent the rearming of Georgia”. The threat was made bluntly at the same time as Biden’s speech in Georgia. His are not empty words, as demonstrated last year when Russia invaded Georgia to separate the two territories and declared their independence.

Washington’s relationship with Moscow is the most critical of all since Russia’s ability to foment trouble for the US and its European allies is infinite. For instance, it can drag its feet over helping Washington to stop Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. It can conspire with Iran to make trouble in Afghanistan, especially in the Southern provinces where American troops fighting as part of Obama’s surge are already taking more casualties.

It can encourage Iran to keep Iraq destabilized for decades and create a Cold War with US-backed Arabs in the Gulf. It can incite Syria to make trouble in Lebanon and use the Hezbollah to keep Israel off balance.

It can quietly destabilize Pakistan’s Western frontier regions where Russian intelligence operatives have been present since well before America’s arrival. It can also stymie Obama’s foreign policies in the oil-rich central Asian countries, including those bordering on China’s restive Western regions populated by over 30 million Uyghurs and other Muslims of Turkic descent.

And we have not even touched on Western Europe’s energy security and its bilateral economic and military relationships with Moscow. Europe depends heavily on Russian oil and gas, so Obama will not be able to easily unite Europeans to confront Russia’s political ambitions.

Before Russia’s invasion last year, Georgia made a military assault into South Ossetia expecting blessings from former President George Bush. Instead, Russia moved quickly to punish Georgia.

Moscow’s motives in Abkhazia and South Ossetia were far from altruistic. It has no love of democracy and freedom taking root in neighboring territories. It used military power to tell Washington that it must have a veto over how far countries in its vicinity, like Georgia, Ukraine or Belorussia and others in Central Asia, can integrate with the Western way of life and democracy.

The veto is as unacceptable to Obama’s Washington and West Europe as it was to the Bush White House. But Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili is not a trustworthy ally. He is fighting for his political life and may again be tempted to use military adventurism to rally patriotic fervor behind him, like he did a year ago.

He slipped Washington’s leash once and could do it again. But the cost to Obama would be very high if Russia retaliates with military force. Sending American or European soldiers to die for Saakashvili in a war with Russia will be all but impossible. Western voters will never allow it.

It will also be embarrassing since the Georgian is far from being a democratic leader. He has muzzled the press, stifled opposition and is using dubious means to hang on to power. Yet, failure to intervene will make Obama look irresolute and Moscow will see that as a victory. That would change the balance of power in Europe for decades.

Russia, rather than Afghanistan, may be Obama’s undoing in foreign policy. Tensions amounting to a Cool War with Russia do not make sense from any standpoint.

  • pacatrue
    I understand pretty much every convern here, Brij, but at the same time, what's the alternative? Should Biden say, "Georgia is a small satellite of Russia, and the people there have no right to determine their own government?"
  • peterfro
    (This is more of a response to pacatrue than a response to the original post)

    The problem is that there is no international body with universal standards. America acts as the standards body, except it makes up the rules as it goes along. The Abkhazians can legitimately claim way more rights to an independent state than the Kosovars. Before last year, Kosovo had never existed as a separate state. Prior to Stalin's forced merger of Georgia and Abkhazia those two had never been TOGETHER. So, it's ok to criticise Putin and his buddies, but what are you suggesting? Always trust whoever is in Washington to come up with the fairest solution? Unfortunately, that won't work for most people. It should be a matter for the U.N.... or, in the absence of a standard, a regional matter. But not a pretext for meddling in the affairs of states half-way across the globe.

    And let's not forget the reason the U.S. is meddling there. Nobody in Washington gives a **** about democracy. (There's no democracy is neighboring Azerbaijan - and what - anybody protesting?) Georgia is only important because of its geographic position, linking Caspian oil & gas with Europe. That is it. Let's stop pretending there is ANYTHING beyond that.
  • pacatrue
    Peter, I think I had narrower concerns on this issue when I wrote. I had in mind something as simple as, "Georgia wishes to join NATO." Should the U.S. say that we do not think the state of Georgia has the right to make their own decision on that, because it would make Russia angry and Georgia must do what Russia says? On this, if we speak at all, we either have to say that Georgia can determine its own affairs or say it cannot.
  • peterfro
    The wish of the Georgian people to join is debatable. I can probably find plenty of opinions (from within Georgia - and not from "Joe the Plummer" kind of people - respected writers and intellectuals) that lean against it.

    But I can say one thing for sure; the vast majority of Ukrainians do NOT wish to join NATO and yet the US keeps pushing them in that direction and the media keeps creating the illusion that the only thing between a happy democratic Ukraine and the membership is the sullen and angry Moscow. Why is it being done? Again, because Washington pursues a certain policy in the region, whether or not the peoples of that region like it. So, again, Russian behavior may not be perfectly gentlemanly but it strikes me as obvious that the U.S. is way worse because it doesn't even have the moral grounds to say - well, listen, this really concerns us because it's on our borders.

    Imagine for a second that Russia orchestrated two coups d'état - let's say in Nicaragua and Mexico, having staged popular protests (people in those countries are as poor or Ukrainians and Georgians and have as much to reprimand their government for), installed a Russian-speaking, Moscow-educated president in one and a president married to a Russian woman (whom he met at a KGB/FSB-sponsored "date") in another and started pushing for the two countries to join a military alliance with Russia. At that point people in the U.S. would be asking: just what the hell is going on??? Where is our government?? We should *never* allow that on our borders! Forget what these idiots want, *we* don't want that anywhere near us, period!

    But that's almost exactly what the Russians are actually going through right now! And Biden's argument is basically "tough - you're weak now, so shut up and listen to our lectures about democracy while we build up military installations around you". Not sure this is a very constructive tone.

    And, to come back to the original post by Brij, which I agree with, the results of this "policy" may be more destabilizing than people in Washington (or Kiev/Tbilisi) realize.
  • sehersen
    This administration is continuing on the framework of previous, repeating same idiotic statements "we will protect our interests in the region". What exactly is "our interest" in this region? How can one U. S. cabinet member go to Russia and expect cooperation on substantial issues such as nuclear arms, North Korea or Afghanistan and send another member to Georgia the following week and make statements that "we will stand by them no matter what". The idea of cooperating with Russia while supporting Georgia is an oxymoron. Georgia government has done nothing but alienate itself from its neighbors and their own citizens while floundering away funds on needless wars. Is it smart to be irritating Russia when you are located on its arm reach like a mosquito ready to be smacked? Where does it get the courage?
    Did the people of this union give permission to this or the previous administration to pick a war with Russia and spend tons of money over a region where majority of the people of this union aren't even aware of its existence. Rice herself admitted that Georgia received more money than it should have (of course it should have received absolutely nothing but that's in the pass now) and now Biden goes there and makes further promises. The support of the people of this country for the current administration is steady merely because majority of the people don't know what the heck is going on. It's easy to say American's don't know but actually trying to understand U.S. International Policy is sort of like a visit to DMV. Frustrating. Every time you ask a question to President's press secretary he refers you to the State Department who will refer you to the department handling the specific region, who will refer you to the ambassador, who turns out the be the same fat-lazy-moron a previous administration has placed there for the last god knows how many years, who will refer you to the same old stale documents. Other than the letterhead there has actually been no "Change" whatsoever. Of course the administration has accounted for the lack of interest of the people in knowing how they are exactly being represented in the world. I don't understand what U.S.'s interest in the region is even though I am trying to. All of the theories I have heard are nonsense. Is it because I am so dumb or is U.S. following a nonsense policy? Or maybe, just maybe, America and Russia are just playing a game. They are playing a game because, well, it's just so much fun. Russia already knew what Biden was going to say when he visited Georgia. Russia didn't care because it's all part of the game.
    Regarding the comments "Georgia should be able to make its own decisions": Why must we say that? Is it because it sounds right? This naive attitude, the sweet sound of being fare, brings tears to my eyes or does it make me want to vomit. Does Georgia actually make its own decisions? Has it ever or could it ever? Georgia or any other nation of similar caliber, in the surrounding area (NATO member or not) do not, nor will they ever be able to make their own decisions, simply because they cannot afford it. They are all supported by some other nation who can afford making decisions and therefore the smaller nations' desire to be totally independent from the goals of supporting nations is futile. These nations and their people, sadly, are nothing but pawns of the larger nations. They must pick a side or else they will cease to exist.
    Georgia should be able to make its own decisions but not Abkhazia. Who gets to decide that Abkhaz people should forget all the efforts and sacrifices of their ancestors to survive and wake up one day and say "oh the heck with it, we'll just be Georgians now". One has to step away from the trees to see the forest but one also must appreciate each tree in order to enjoy the view of the forest. Abkhazians managed to survive against many blows in its history and they are not going to give up now. U.S. does not know what it's like to be part of something as old as being an Abkhaz, therefore cannot calculate the amount of resistance Georgia will receive from Abkhazians.
    Supporting Georgia but no military action... What the heck does that mean? Unless Russia promised America that they will exchange Abkhazians' freedom for something else in the goodie bag, how is America going to help Georgia protect its imaginary border integrity but not use force.
    Any public statement this administration makes regarding Georgia vs. Abkhazia is nothing but a bunch of bullshit, i.e. not worth pondering because they won't say what they mean and they won't do what they say.
  • geosukhumi
    do not lie you won't find any mentally healthy geogrian that don't wants to join nato
    i am myself are refugee from abkhazia like rest of 300.000 georgans had to leave my home just because i was georgian
    what russians did to us nazi germany didn;t do to jews
    you people don't know what kind of monster russia is not ppl but their leaders like putin.
    Thanks to Joe Biden and americas compation or else those monsters would destroy georgia and geogrgian people.
    Thank you Biden!
  • peterfro
    @Geosukhumi,

    First of all, if your family suffered personally from the conflict in Abkhazia in the 90s, please accept my sympathies. Any such conflict is a human tragedy.

    However, as hard as it may be, try not to let these events take control of your logic and ability to judge the situation impartially. I don't want to defend anything that happened in Abkhazia (although I am perplexed you blame the Russians for it directly), but Georgia's presence in NATO will certainly not rectify it.

    In fact, since you're not believing there's even one Georgian who would be doubtful about NATO membership, I invite you to watch this interview with Malkhaz Gulashvili on RealNews. It's an intelligent man, a respected publisher, and an ethnic Georgian - so you shouldn't have trouble to at least try to listen to what he's saying:

    http://therealnews.com/t/index.php?option=com_c...

    In essence, he makes a convincing case that Georgia's presence in NATO would be counter to Georgia's own interests. Take a listen.
  • peterfro
    Ok, I found some specific numbers for NATO membership support in Georgia & Ukraine (late 2008):

    * Georgia ~ 70% for (High, but hardly close to 100%. And that's 3 months after the war with Russia! In all likelihood, bound to go down eventually)
    * Ukraine ~ 30%

    Source: Atlantic Review Press Digest Nov 7 2008
    http://atlanticreview.org/archives/1206-Two-Dif...
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC