Comments on: Waterless Urinals Piss Off New York State Workers

By: jeanvaliquette

jeanvaliquette — Mon, 27 Jul 2009 12:42:42 +0000

WHAT BRAND NAME WAS USED……ARE THEY ALL LIKE THAT ????

By: charlesvejvoda

charlesvejvoda — Fri, 24 Jul 2009 01:13:04 +0000

The Times Union was highly selective in its reporting, If you would like to see the grievance response I will send it to requesters.
request info from mrfixit_once @ yahoo.com
C. Vejvoda

By: StockBoySF

StockBoySF — Wed, 22 Jul 2009 04:33:11 +0000

I guess they could always use the toilets instead of the urinals. And since toilets take up more water when flushing than urinals, the administration would need to replace waterless urinals with uh… “watered” urinals to save water.

By: PJBFan

PJBFan — Wed, 22 Jul 2009 02:52:56 +0000

My undergraduate institution had waterless urinals in a couple places. I can tell you for certain that no matter how much cleaning was done, the urinals always had problems with splash back, and a constant odour of urine the scent of which could be detected even outside the bathroom. These things are more of a biohazard than an environmentally friendly device.

By: GeorgeSorwell

GeorgeSorwell — Wed, 22 Jul 2009 02:03:07 +0000

Did they fire all their janitors?