An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Gail Collins, John Ensign, and Family Values

I have to agree with some of our readers.

We are spending entirely too much time on frivolous issues such as the Palin “Higher Calling” resignation and Sanford’s sultry Argentinean love affair.

And I won’t even touch the Michael Jackson “issue.”

There are too many other real issues to be discussed and analyzed.

One of them is, of course, the “What Happened in Vegas” issue—one that apparently didn’t stay in Vegas.

And who better to bring us up to date on the latest developments on this non-issue—one that was just about to go off the radar screen—than The New York Times’ Gail Collins.

In an Op-Ed column this morning titled—surprise!—”What Happened in Vegas,” we learn that what had started as just another run-of-the-mill Republican sex scandal, has now turned into what Collins calls a “family affair.”

Most of the “juicy details” about the Ensign family affair are being provided by a member of another family: Doug Hampton, Ensign’s former chief of staff and husband of Cindy—a bookkeeper for Ensign’s PAC—who (Cindy, that is) “was seduced by the senator while they were guests at the Ensign home over the Christmas holidays in 2007.”

Not really part of the story, but revealing nevertheless of a certain human trait called hypocrisy, are the following facts pointed out by Collins:

…that Ensign was one of the people who demanded that President Bill Clinton resign over the Lewinsky affair, that he votes against financing for education and contraception services to combat teenage pregnancy and that he supports a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage…

Collins then says something about hypocrisy being a hard market to corner, but that “lately the Republicans have been making a Microsoft-like effort to do it.” But, we’ll let that one slide.

Back to Hampton’s spilling of the family beans.

After providing some interesting details about Ensign living with some other conservative Christian lawmakers in 2008, in a building known as the “Prayer House,” in Washington (Hampton doesn’t mention what they prayed about), Hampton describes one of Ensign’s roommates, Senator Tom Coburn of Oklahoma, “as being particularly vocal about the importance of cash contributions to ‘make these folks whole.’” The “folks” being the grieved Doug and Cindy Hampton.

While Coburn denies this, apparently Ensign parents thought this would be a good idea.

According to Collins:

While Ensign refused to respond to what small and negative minds might regard as blackmail, the senator’s parents gave the Hamptons $96,000. Ensign’s father is a retired casino mogul, and the senator’s lawyer said the money was given “out of concern for the well-being of longtime family friends during a difficult time. The gifts are consistent with a pattern of generosity by the Ensign family to the Hamptons and others.”

Collins concludes, “Truly, this puts a whole new spin on the term ‘family values.’”

But enough about Republican sex scandals and family values. We are spending entirely too much time and (virtual) ink on these. But should you be interested in more “juicy details,” which I doubt, please click here.

Perhaps next week there will be some “real issues” to be dealt with.

  • AlwaysOptimistic
    What should be important to us is not who these people are sleeping with, but their connections to secret religious organizations like "The Family". Ensign and several other Republican Congressmen are living at a "C Street" residence that is owned by this organization and is registered as a "church", with all the tax exemptions that go with that title.

    We should be demanding "separation of church and state" from our political leaders.

    More on "The Family":

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/
  • SteveK
    Thanks for the link AlwaysOptimistic. Quit an informative, question raising twelve minutes by the always open minded Rachael Maddow.

    I always thought John Ensign looked familiar (pun intended) but as we find that the C Street "Family" considers itself the Mafia of Christianity I took a second look at Ensign and he looks a lot like another John... John Gotti.
  • Tomasian23
    Affairs happen to like 50% of married men, but is that really an excuse? Everyone’s doing it so I will too. It’s no big deal…. Well, it is when you're in the public eye and have people at C-street involved in paying off the affair, encouraging the end of the affair, keeping it a cover-up

    Ensign shouldn’t have stood on such a moral high ground if he couldn’t follow his own advice. Of course there’s going to be backlash. Like Rachel Maddow said: “A politicians affair becomes newsworthy if that politician has built his or her career on the basis of his or her own superior personal morality on crusading against the perceived immorality of the rest of us rabble.”
    http://www.newsy.com/videos/ensign_affair_devil...
  • DaGoat
    That Ensign is a hypocrite is without question, and hypocrisy seems to be the highest sin one can commit in the eyes of Democrats. When you throw sex into it the result is a series of gleeful posts from the predominately left-leaning staff here at TMV. And yes the GOP was just as gleeful when it was Clinton who couldn't keep his pants zipped.

    The thing is this type of gotcha political debate really isn't very productive. There are certainly worse Republicans than Ensign - I would mention Don Young and Ted Stevens off the top of my head. And there's a slew of questionable Democrats who rarely get mentioned in here - Jefferson, Burris, Dodd, Murtha, Rangel, Mollohan, etc.

    The old saying "sex sells" still holds true I guess.
  • D. E.Rodriguez
    Good points, DG.

    However, did Jefferson preach and beat Republicans over the head with "Thou shall not stash bundles of cash in the freezer?", or did he introduce anti-stashing-cash in the freezer legislation?

    Or, did Burris preach and beat Republicans over ther head with "Thou shall not sell a seat in the U.S. Senate to the highest bidder?"

    etc., etc.

    Thanks for the comments

    Dorian
  • Gegenschattenbild
    So affairs just "happen" to "like 50% of married men?" I think it's best to use the active voice as much as possible. Let's try "Like 50% of married men have affairs." Not great, but it surely reflects the fact that affairs don't just "happen to" people...
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC