Comments on: Robert McNamara, Architect of Vietnam War, Has Died

By: Leonidas

Leonidas — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 04:19:08 +0000

“I'm kind of surprised, however, by how often those on the Left give Lyndon Johnson a pass, given that he misled us into an unnecessary war. Howard Dean, who gained heavy support from the Left due to his virulent opposition to the Iraq War, inexplicably listed Johnson as one of the best presidents of the twentieth century.”

I didn't like LBJ, but I will give him major points for one thing, his stance on Civil Rights. He is well worthy of scorn in other areas, but we should give him the credit that he does deserve on that issue.

By: Don Quijote

Don Quijote — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 12:08:49 +0000

Actually, it's pretty well known that McNamara has been reviled by the Left. I'm kind of surprised, however, by how often those on the Left give Lyndon Johnson a pass, given that he misled us into an unnecessary war.

He didn't mislead us into an unnecessary war, it had been going on for a couple of years prior to him moving into the White House, he just did what Obama has done in Afghanistan, DOUBLE DOWN.

Medicare/Medicaid, Civil Right Act of 1964, PBS are all major legislative accomplishments that are still with us 40 years later...

I 'll be shocked if Obama manages to do half of that...

By: nicrivera

nicrivera — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 09:27:38 +0000

By “Left”, I mean those falling left of center on the political spectrum (as opposed to the fringe left or partisan Democrats).

By: nicrivera

nicrivera — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 09:25:39 +0000

Wait. None of this can be correct. It implies hypocrisy, self-serving government, and lying about war efforts and hiding key information existed both in a Democratic administration, and prior to George W. Bush being President.

Actually, it's pretty well known that McNamara has been reviled by the Left. I'm kind of surprised, however, by how often those on the Left give Lyndon Johnson a pass, given that he misled us into an unnecessary war. Howard Dean, who gained heavy support from the Left due to his virulent opposition to the Iraq War, inexplicably listed Johnson as one of the best presidents of the twentieth century.

By: joeinhell

joeinhell — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 05:49:34 +0000

Of course no blame should be laid at the foot of the merchants of death who financed and bought each of these Presidents. Boeing went bankrupt in 1927 and will never show a profit without those little subsidies for its “war profiteering.” Dow would be bankrupt but for its contracts to run government arsenals. Inefficient too, read about the Rocky Flats nuclear excursion in the late 60s or early 70s. I'm sure we really need all of our 15,000 nuclear warheads, but I have a feeling quite a bit were built for “political contributions.”

If I had met Mr McNamara, I would have killed him in a hot second. Two of my friends died as a direct result of his choice of Westmoreland as General in command and his brilliant copy of Dien Bien Phu. For forty years since my tour in that hell we made of a nice little country, I have tried to figure out how I can contribute to stopping the evil. I still haven't figured it out, but my Agent Orange poisoning will kill me soon enough. I'm not sure who made that poison but I'll bet their profits were great during that filthy war.

By: joeinhell

joeinhell — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 05:30:52 +0000

Hip hip hooray the devil's gotten another one of his own. Die Kissinger, you fucking mass murderer, die you ancient piece of crap. Die of pancreatic cancer in its most painful form.

By: Don Quijote

Don Quijote — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 05:24:11 +0000

In early November 1967, McNamara's recommendation to freeze troop levels, stop bombing North Vietnam and for the US to hand over ground fighting to South Vietnam was rejected outright by President Lyndon B. Johnson.

Who was followed in the White House by some crook called Nixon who pursued identical policies for the following four years after having gone behind LBJ's back and torpedoed peace talks in Paris.

By: AustinRoth

AustinRoth — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 04:43:52 +0000

Wait. None of this can be correct. It implies hypocrisy, self-serving government, and lying about war efforts and hiding key information existed both in a Democratic administration, and prior to George W. Bush being President.

I am pretty sure from all my readings here the past few years that just cannot be the case.

By: Leonidas

Leonidas — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 02:53:03 +0000

Well we know who appointed McNamara, JFK, we all know who kept him on LBJ.

By: keelaay

keelaay — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 02:38:58 +0000

Thanks for your analysis Ms Kattenburg. Mr McNamara is indeed a complex character. That he had so publicly and painfully admitted his inner torments is in my view a virtue — not a failing to be derided as many are very happy to do. But I do not in any way argue that he is redeemed. He promoted policy positions and war actions with horrific consequences and thus was haunted and tormented until his death. Mr. McNamara's national security views and actions during his tenure in the Kennedy and Johnson administrations are eerily similar to those of the Neocons of today. Thus his mea culpas such as in the documentary “Fog of War” should serve as warnings to those who are so over-confident that they refuse to consider, much less understand, our historical failings. Thus, Mr. McNamara's sad regrets remain generally ignored by those in power and vehemently reviled by the right. While I don't necessarily support the position that the Vietnam War could not have been won, I think there remains a more important question. Should the US have interceded in Vietnam at all? This is not a query to lay at the feet of Mr McNamara but instead of Presidents Eisenhower, Kennedy, and Johnson. The covert and then overt incursions, ultimate war, and human tragedy in Vietnam was ultimately waged by these Commanders in Chief.

By: Father_Time

Father_Time — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:28:14 +0000

This man ADMITTEDLY lied to President Lyndon B Johnson about the analysis and statistical facts regarding the Vietnam war. In his own arrogant manipulative actions he decided policy that the constitution permits only the president to decide. The fact that this man was never prosecuted for his obvious crimes remains a monument to the hypocrisy and thus weakness of our form of government. Not to mention our lack of respect for the rule of law.