<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DVD Review: Law &amp; Order Criminal Intent &#8211; The First Year</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/38168/dvd-review-law-order-criminal-intent-the-first-year/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/38168/dvd-review-law-order-criminal-intent-the-first-year/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 18:37:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: daveski</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/38168/dvd-review-law-order-criminal-intent-the-first-year/comment-page-1/#comment-192516</link>
		<dc:creator>daveski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 22:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=38168#comment-192516</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicole_Wallace&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicole_Wallace&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Gotta love Wikipedia! She actually appeared in 5 episodess - season 2 (S2E03 and S2E23), 4 (S4E04), 5 (S5E01), and 7 (very briefly in S7E22).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;While I agree that the post season 2 episodes were rather lame, I found the episodes in season 2 to be very good. Her second appearance that season was in the season finale - a two part storyline where she wasn&#039;t even on the &quot;radar&quot; of Goren during part one. Since they introduced her as an intellectual equivalent to Goren earlier in that season - and really left the door open for her to return - I thought it was a pretty strong plot twist.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Joe, how have you liked the &quot;B&quot; partners this show has had in the latter seasons? I haven&#039;t caught enough of Jeff Goldblum yet to have an opinion, but I always liked Chris Noth as an actor and was happy to see they finally foudn a way to give the Mike Logan character some more episodes - but yet again the writers ended with a sour note.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicole_Wallace" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicole_Wallace</a></p>
<p>Gotta love Wikipedia! She actually appeared in 5 episodess &#8211; season 2 (S2E03 and S2E23), 4 (S4E04), 5 (S5E01), and 7 (very briefly in S7E22).</p>
<p>While I agree that the post season 2 episodes were rather lame, I found the episodes in season 2 to be very good. Her second appearance that season was in the season finale &#8211; a two part storyline where she wasn&#39;t even on the &#8220;radar&#8221; of Goren during part one. Since they introduced her as an intellectual equivalent to Goren earlier in that season &#8211; and really left the door open for her to return &#8211; I thought it was a pretty strong plot twist.</p>
<p>Joe, how have you liked the &#8220;B&#8221; partners this show has had in the latter seasons? I haven&#39;t caught enough of Jeff Goldblum yet to have an opinion, but I always liked Chris Noth as an actor and was happy to see they finally foudn a way to give the Mike Logan character some more episodes &#8211; but yet again the writers ended with a sour note.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joegandelman</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/38168/dvd-review-law-order-criminal-intent-the-first-year/comment-page-1/#comment-192501</link>
		<dc:creator>joegandelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 20:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=38168#comment-192501</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll have to rewatch the whole set since I swear the first episode was on that. The background on this is that last summer I performed at 8 fairs in Montana, Utah and Wisconsin in a 7 week period. I knew some of the TV would be awful so I brought a few sets of DVDs with me. This was the one I loved the most out of all of them. I found the first episode with Nicole lame and each one that featured her after that even more lame. If I&#039;m wrong (and I am a lot of the time!) I stand corrected. That said: people in entertainment love to create something that&#039;s memorable...like a trademark line...But creating a memorable reoccuring villain can only work if the story line seems natural and flows within the context of the series. The James Bond baddies work; Holmes&#039; nemesis works. This one I felt really flopped and if I see the show on reruns and one of those comes on I turn it off. I don&#039;t mind the actress...it&#039;s the scripting..it is like &quot;jumping the shark&quot; in its literal meaning...suddenly he has this exotic murderess who&#039;s a nemesis who wins and kills people he sympathes with and cares about. It&#039;s the series weak spot. THAT SAID: the other two actors who came into relieve him of his burden did a GREAT job and this show is a joy to behold in its originals and re-runs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ll have to rewatch the whole set since I swear the first episode was on that. The background on this is that last summer I performed at 8 fairs in Montana, Utah and Wisconsin in a 7 week period. I knew some of the TV would be awful so I brought a few sets of DVDs with me. This was the one I loved the most out of all of them. I found the first episode with Nicole lame and each one that featured her after that even more lame. If I&#39;m wrong (and I am a lot of the time!) I stand corrected. That said: people in entertainment love to create something that&#39;s memorable&#8230;like a trademark line&#8230;But creating a memorable reoccuring villain can only work if the story line seems natural and flows within the context of the series. The James Bond baddies work; Holmes&#39; nemesis works. This one I felt really flopped and if I see the show on reruns and one of those comes on I turn it off. I don&#39;t mind the actress&#8230;it&#39;s the scripting..it is like &#8220;jumping the shark&#8221; in its literal meaning&#8230;suddenly he has this exotic murderess who&#39;s a nemesis who wins and kills people he sympathes with and cares about. It&#39;s the series weak spot. THAT SAID: the other two actors who came into relieve him of his burden did a GREAT job and this show is a joy to behold in its originals and re-runs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stefanl</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/38168/dvd-review-law-order-criminal-intent-the-first-year/comment-page-1/#comment-192491</link>
		<dc:creator>stefanl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 19:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=38168#comment-192491</guid>
		<description>Season one is most definitely a keeper.  Seeing how the character of Goren formed from the very start is always a wonder to behold, but your comments about jumping the shark are a season too soon.  Olivia d&#039;Abo&#039;s creation, the every annoying, impossible to kill Nicole Wallace, wasn&#039;t introduced until season two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Season one is most definitely a keeper.  Seeing how the character of Goren formed from the very start is always a wonder to behold, but your comments about jumping the shark are a season too soon.  Olivia d&#39;Abo&#39;s creation, the every annoying, impossible to kill Nicole Wallace, wasn&#39;t introduced until season two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Father_Time</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/38168/dvd-review-law-order-criminal-intent-the-first-year/comment-page-1/#comment-192487</link>
		<dc:creator>Father_Time</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 19:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=38168#comment-192487</guid>
		<description>A new series; Baghdad PD sounds like it could be exciting enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new series; Baghdad PD sounds like it could be exciting enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

