
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Happy Motoring, America; Shafted Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/37889/happy-motoring-america-shafted-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/37889/happy-motoring-america-shafted-again/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 12:59:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GreenDreams</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/37889/happy-motoring-america-shafted-again/comment-page-1/#comment-192245</link>
		<dc:creator>GreenDreams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 18:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=37889#comment-192245</guid>
		<description>Scary, and true. But the giant player in this, the creator of the oil price bubble and many others (real estate, dot com, oil, the bailout and even the Great Depression) is Goldman Sachs, dubbed &quot;The bubble machine&quot; by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/28816321/the_great_american_bubble_machine/3&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Matt Taibbi &lt;/a&gt;in Rolling Stone. It&#039;s a must read article, though a bit profanity laced as Matt can be. I&#039;d be interested in free marketeers&#039; take on this article, please. The entire article can be read on the excellent Zero Hedge, &lt;a href=&quot;http://zerohedge.blogspot.com/2009/06/goldman-sachs-engineering-every-major.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt;. Highlights:&lt;br&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Dot-com: The basic scam in the Internet Age is pretty easy even for the financially illiterate to grasp. Companies that weren&#039;t much more than pot-fueled ideas scrawled on napkins by up-too-late bong-smokers were taken public via IPOs, hyped in the media and sold to the public for megamillions... They did this by setting up what was, in reality, a two-tiered investment system — one for the insiders who knew the real numbers, and another for the lay investor who was invited to chase soaring prices the banks themselves knew were irrational. While Goldman&#039;s later pattern would be to capitalize on changes in the regulatory environment, its key innovation in the Internet years was to abandon its own industry&#039;s standards of quality control.&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Goldman&#039;s role in the sweeping global disaster that was the housing bubble is not hard to trace. Here again, the basic trick was a decline in underwriting standards, although in this case the standards weren&#039;t in IPOs but in mortgages. By now almost everyone knows that for decades mortgage dealers insisted that home buyers be able to produce a down payment of 10 percent or more, show a steady income and good credit rating, and possess a real first and last name. Then, at the dawn of the new millennium, they suddenly threw all that.. out the window and started writing mortgages on the backs of napkins to cocktail waitresses and ex-cons carrying five bucks and a Snickers bar.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And what caused the huge spike in oil prices? Take a wild guess. Obviously Goldman had help — there were other players in the physical-commodities market — but the root cause had almost everything to do with the behavior of a few powerful actors determined to turn the once-solid market into a speculative casino. Goldman did it by persuading pension funds and other large institutional investors to invest in oil futures — agreeing to buy oil at a certain price on a fixed date. The push transformed oil from a physical commodity, rigidly subject to supply and demand, into something to bet on, like a stock. Between 2003 and 2008, the amount of speculative money in commodities grew from $13 billion to $317 billion, an increase of 2,300 percent. By 2008, a barrel of oil was traded 27 times, on average, before it was actually delivered and consumed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;I credit this article with souring me on the cap and trade system in the energy bill.&lt;br&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;instead of credit derivatives or oil futures or mortgage-backed CDOs, the new game in town, the next bubble, is in carbon credits — a booming trillion- dollar market that barely even exists yet, but will if the Democratic Party that it gave $4,452,585 to in the last election manages to push into existence a groundbreaking new commodities bubble, disguised as an &quot;environmental plan,&quot; called cap-and-trade. The new carbon-credit market is a virtual repeat of the commodities-market casino that&#039;s been kind to Goldman, except it has one delicious new wrinkle: If the plan goes forward as expected, the rise in prices will be government-mandated. Goldman won&#039;t even have to rig the game. It will be rigged in advance.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scary, and true. But the giant player in this, the creator of the oil price bubble and many others (real estate, dot com, oil, the bailout and even the Great Depression) is Goldman Sachs, dubbed &#8220;The bubble machine&#8221; by <a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/28816321/the_great_american_bubble_machine/3" rel="nofollow">Matt Taibbi </a>in Rolling Stone. It&#39;s a must read article, though a bit profanity laced as Matt can be. I&#39;d be interested in free marketeers&#39; take on this article, please. The entire article can be read on the excellent Zero Hedge, <a href="http://zerohedge.blogspot.com/2009/06/goldman-sachs-engineering-every-major.html" rel="nofollow">HERE</a>. Highlights:<br />
<blockquote>Dot-com: The basic scam in the Internet Age is pretty easy even for the financially illiterate to grasp. Companies that weren&#39;t much more than pot-fueled ideas scrawled on napkins by up-too-late bong-smokers were taken public via IPOs, hyped in the media and sold to the public for megamillions&#8230; They did this by setting up what was, in reality, a two-tiered investment system — one for the insiders who knew the real numbers, and another for the lay investor who was invited to chase soaring prices the banks themselves knew were irrational. While Goldman&#39;s later pattern would be to capitalize on changes in the regulatory environment, its key innovation in the Internet years was to abandon its own industry&#39;s standards of quality control.
<p>Goldman&#39;s role in the sweeping global disaster that was the housing bubble is not hard to trace. Here again, the basic trick was a decline in underwriting standards, although in this case the standards weren&#39;t in IPOs but in mortgages. By now almost everyone knows that for decades mortgage dealers insisted that home buyers be able to produce a down payment of 10 percent or more, show a steady income and good credit rating, and possess a real first and last name. Then, at the dawn of the new millennium, they suddenly threw all that.. out the window and started writing mortgages on the backs of napkins to cocktail waitresses and ex-cons carrying five bucks and a Snickers bar.</p>
<p>And what caused the huge spike in oil prices? Take a wild guess. Obviously Goldman had help — there were other players in the physical-commodities market — but the root cause had almost everything to do with the behavior of a few powerful actors determined to turn the once-solid market into a speculative casino. Goldman did it by persuading pension funds and other large institutional investors to invest in oil futures — agreeing to buy oil at a certain price on a fixed date. The push transformed oil from a physical commodity, rigidly subject to supply and demand, into something to bet on, like a stock. Between 2003 and 2008, the amount of speculative money in commodities grew from $13 billion to $317 billion, an increase of 2,300 percent. By 2008, a barrel of oil was traded 27 times, on average, before it was actually delivered and consumed.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I credit this article with souring me on the cap and trade system in the energy bill.<br />
<blockquote>instead of credit derivatives or oil futures or mortgage-backed CDOs, the new game in town, the next bubble, is in carbon credits — a booming trillion- dollar market that barely even exists yet, but will if the Democratic Party that it gave $4,452,585 to in the last election manages to push into existence a groundbreaking new commodities bubble, disguised as an &#8220;environmental plan,&#8221; called cap-and-trade. The new carbon-credit market is a virtual repeat of the commodities-market casino that&#39;s been kind to Goldman, except it has one delicious new wrinkle: If the plan goes forward as expected, the rise in prices will be government-mandated. Goldman won&#39;t even have to rig the game. It will be rigged in advance.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim_Satterfield</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/37889/happy-motoring-america-shafted-again/comment-page-1/#comment-192243</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim_Satterfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 18:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=37889#comment-192243</guid>
		<description>Market speculation of all kinds is a highly over-rated activity open to abuse. While I&#039;m not saying that it should be banned it badly needs re-structuring. One person should not have the ability to hose an entire market and/or their employer like we have seen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Market speculation of all kinds is a highly over-rated activity open to abuse. While I&#39;m not saying that it should be banned it badly needs re-structuring. One person should not have the ability to hose an entire market and/or their employer like we have seen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

