An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Read My Lips, (Almost) No New Taxes

This post is addressed only to those readers who earn less than $250,000 per year. George Stephanopoulos was doing his best yesterday morning to figure out if President Obama really meant it when he promised not to raise taxes on you. Steph put the question to David Axelrod:

STEPHANOPOULOS: I want to show our viewers something the president said during the campaign back in September.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

OBAMA: I can make a firm pledge: Under my plan, no family making less than $250,000 a year will see any form of tax increase, not your income tax, not your payroll tax, not your capital gains taxes, not any of your taxes.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

STEPHANOPOULOS: Not any of your taxes, a firm pledge. Does that mean the president will veto any health care bill that includes a tax increase on people earning less than $250,000 a year?

AXELROD: Well, first of all, George, let’s make a few points. The president has said whatever is done has to not add to the deficit. So that’s one of the prerequisites for this bill…

[The President] has proposed a plan that would be in keeping with the promise that he made, to cap deductions for the wealthiest Americans on their taxes.

He still believes that’s the way to go. And he has made a strong case to the House and the Senate on it.

STEPHANOPOULOS: But he also said this week he was open to compromise on this. And as you know, the Senate is looking especially at this issue of capping the deductions for health care that employers and employees now get. That would get — would be a tax increase for many families earning under $250,000.

But the president said he was open to it. So that means that the tax pledge he made back in September is no longer operative?

AXELROD: Well, George, first of all, there are a lot of different formulations of that plan. The president had said in the past that he doesn’t believe taxing health care benefits at any level is necessarily the best way to go here. He still believes that…

We’ve gotten a long way down the road and we want to finish that journey.

STEPHANOPOULOS: But if you’re open to tax increases for people under $250,000, that means that the pledge he made last September in Dover is no longer operative.

AXELROD: George, I think the president has made clear the way he feels this should be funded. And certainly is consistent with what he said during…

STEPHANOPOULOS: But he’s not drawing a line in the sand.

AXELROD: … the campaign.

STEPHANOPOULOS: He said that.

AXELROD: Well, you know what? The — one of the problems we’ve had in this town is that people draw lines in the sand and they stop talking to each other. And you don’t get anything done. That’s not the way the president approaches us.

Sort of funny, isn’t it. Obama kept drawing that same line in the sand almost every day during the campaign. No taxes if you earn under $250,000! I guess when you want change something from a “pledge” into something more malleable, you call it a line in the sand.

Cross-posted at Conventional Folly

  • Actually he said his plan doesn't raise taxes of people under 250k. The President isn't emperor, even this one. If the bill can't make it through congress without upping some taxes on people under that, then thats not a reason to veto it. Unless there is a different quote elsewhere, he didn't say above that he would veto any bill that raised taxes on people who make less than 250k. There is a huge functional difference.
  • DaGoat
    Well Solomon, you should be in politics. You're saying Obama will not personally raise taxes on people making under 250K, but will sign bills that do.
  • GeorgeSorwell
    The Democrats are trying to fix the health care crisis without increasing the deficit.

    Even if that involves a tax increase, it will still provide a reasonable basis to run for re-election.

    Especially since Republicans have made the strategic decision to be the party that votes no to all possible solutions while offering no alternatives of their own.
  • Father_Time
    Ah George, that’s what the GOP stands for, General Opposition Party.

    Generally Opposed to everything!
  • AustinRoth
    GS - I actually agee with you. Presidential candidates should not make blanket statements about what they will or will not do, as Obama has found out to his detriment on many different fronts. Politics is the art of the possible, and part of that art is compromise.

    The only warning I would say is that making a drop-dead promise about not raising taxes, then going back on that, has historically been a a way to ensure you do not get reelected.
  • Father_Time
    Oh raise taxes on the rich please. I've been waiting for this with subdued glee.
  • Father_Time
    WTF?
  • Father_Time
    I like your avatar Solomon. Considering the amount of information coming from Iran, I suggest a change to:

    "Where Are They?"
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC