An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Tarnished Shields: The Morally Bankrupt ‘Family Values’ Republican Leadership

by Walter Brasch

Some columns are easier to write than others.

This is one of them.

Providing all of my research were the “family values” Republicans.

This week, second term Gov. Mark Sanford of South Carolina disappeared for six days, leaving the state without a chief executive who could make decisions in an emergency. His Republican lieutenant governor didn’t know where he was, and had not been given any authority to make decisions in his absence. The state police said they had not been informed. His wife told the Associated Press she didn’t know where he was, wasn’t worried about him, and thought he was “writing something and wanted some space to get away from the kids” over the Father’s Day weekend. His senior aides said he was walking along the Appalachian Trail to “clear his head.”

But it wasn’t his head that he was clearing. When he returned, after first lying to a reporter for the Columbia State who caught up with him on his return to the Atlanta airport, he finally admitted he went to Argentina to meet with a long-time lover. His wife, who was not by his side when he held an early afternoon press conference, later said she and the governor had separated two weeks earlier. The State later produced e-mail love letters it had been keeping since December.

The rising young star of the Republican party who was seen as a presidential contender in 2012, the man who was head of the Republican Governors Association until the day after he acknowledged his extramarital affair, the man who had wanted to deprive his state of $700 million in federal stimulus funds as a political message to President Obama, the man who had established himself as a beacon for the sanctity of marriage and the values of the oh-so-pure Religious right, was not only an adulterer, but for at least the second time had left his state at risk since there were no contingency plans of how to reach him in an emergency.

Alas, Gov. Sanford isn’t the only “family values” philanderer. Slightly more than a week earlier, Sen. John Ensign (R-Nev.) admitted he had a nine month extramarital affair with one of his campaign staff. Ensign, who was contemplating a run for president in 2012, had been chair of the Republican Policy Committee and the National Republican Senatorial Committee. Like Gov. Sanford, Sen. Ensign only admitted to the affair after information had been leaked to the media.

This is the same John Ensign who, as a congressman, had curled his lips in revulsion at Bill Clinton’s affair, and demanded he either resign or be impeached. “He has no credibility,” Ensign told the Las Vegas Review–Journal in 1998. Six years later, now a senator, Ensign supported a federal ban on same sex marriages by declaring, “Marriage is the cornerstone on which our society was founded . . . . [M]arriage, and the sanctity of that institution, predates the American Constitution and the founding of our nation.” Ironically, Ensign is active in Promise Keepers, an evangelical group.

Also vigorously calling for President Clinton’s impeachment, while having had their own extramarital affairs and covering them up or lying about them, were:

? Rep. Henry Hyde (R-Ill.), chair of the House judiciary committee and the “house manager” for the impeachment, who lied about his own four-year affair with a married woman and then when a newspaper published details in 1998 called the affair in the 40s nothing more than a “youthful indiscretion.” He retired in 2007 after 17 terms in the House.

?Rep. Bob Barr (R-Ga.), who was the first legislator in Congress to call for Clinton’s resignation and then became one of the leaders of the impeachment movement. Barr’s background, however, wasn’t family values pure. He never denied committing adultery with his second wife, and later, while married to his third wife, was photographed at what passed as a charity event licking whipped cream off the breasts of two women. Barr left office in 2003, after four terms.

? Rep. Helen Chenoweth (R-Idaho), who was one of the first to call for Clinton’s resignation, told the Spokane Spokesman-Review that God had pardoned her sins for her six-year extra-marital affair. Chenoweth left office in January 2001 after keeping her promise not to serve more than three terms.

? Fourteen term Rep. Dan Burton (R-Ind), chair of the House Government Reform and Oversight Committee, who not only had a long-time affair with a state employee but had fathered a son from that affair. His website once screamed, “Above all, Dan Burton believes the people have a right to principled leadership and that character does matter.”

? Sen. Larry Craig (R-Idaho), who told Tim Russert on NBC-TV’s “Meet the Press” in 1999 that “The American people already know that Bill Clinton is a bad boy—a naughty boy. I’m going to speak out for the citizens of my state, who in the majority think that Bill Clinton is probably even a nasty, bad, naughty boy.” However, Craig himself was a “bad boy.” In September 2007 he pleaded guilty, and then tried to withdraw his conviction on charges that he solicited a man in the Minneapolis–St. Paul airport. Several gay men later told the Idaho Statesman that Craig, who was married since 1983, had previously tried to solicit them or had sexual relations with them. Craig resigned in September 2007, and then reversed himself, staying in office through 2008. He did not run for re-election.

? Rep. Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.), House speaker from 1995 to 1999, who may have had an affair while his first wife was in the hospital recovering from cancer. Gingrich later cheated on his second wife with the woman who became his third wife during the time he was pushing for Clinton’s resignation.

? Rep. Bob Livingston (R-La.), who was Gingrich’s designated successor until he admitted his own infidelities and eventually resigned from the House.

? Sen. David Vitter (R-La.), who was elected to Livingston’s House seat and served three terms before being identified in a prostitution scandal in Louisiana. In 2004, he was elected to the Senate, three years before Hustler magazine linked him as a client of a prostitution service in Washington, D.C.

? Rep. Don Sherwood (R-Pa), who had a five year affair with a woman 35 years his junior. She later charged that Sherwood had assaulted her several times. He eventually settled for what AP reported was about $500,000. Among those who supported Sherwood during his primary re-election were Sen. Rick Santorum (R-Pa.), one of the leaders of the conservative coalition who in November 2005 said that “Compassionate Conservatism relies on healthy families,” and President George W. Bush who went to northeastern Pennsylvania to help raise funds for Sherwood. However, in the general election of November 2006, Sherwood was defeated for a fifth term.

Add to the list of morally bankrupt Republicans:

? Five term Sen. Bob Packwood (R-Ore.) who resigned in September 1995, three years before the Clinton impeachment, after the bipartisan Ethics Committee unanimously recommended his expulsion following charges of sexual abuse and assault by 10 women, most of them either former staffers or lobbyists.

? Rep. Mark Foley (R-Fla.), a six-term congressman, and co-chair of the Missing and Exploited Children’s Caucus, who had sent sexually explicit e-mails and text messages to a 16 year-old male Congressional page. Foley resigned in September 2006, two months before the general election, long after the Republican leadership had failed to discipline him, and only after a blog (stopsexpredators.blogspot.com) and ABC-TV news exposed his hoped-for affairs may have included other staff dating back at least a decade.

? Rep. Robert E. Bauman (R-Md.), publicly homophobic founder of Young Americans for Freedom and the American Conservative Union, who admitted he had solicited sex with a 16 year old male. Bauman lost the general election in 1980 and later declared himself to be gay.

? Rep. Donald Lukens (R-Ohio), who was convicted in 1989 of a misdemeanor for having sex with a 16-year-old girl. The “affair” may have begun three years earlier. Lukens finally resigned in October 1990, after having lost the Republican primary several months earlier.

Republican leaders aren’t the only ones who commit adultery, nor are conservatives or members of the Religious Right, including preachers, solely the ones to have violated the seventh and tenth Commandments. But, it is the “family values” Republican leaders, who have led the party of right wing moral indignation; it is the Religious Right that has overtaken the party and wears the now-tarnished shield of righteousness to protect itself against anyone who doesn’t share their own views of the world, including moderate and liberal Republicans, and anyone belonging to another political party.

The hypocrisy and moral turpitude of the leaders is just one reason why only 21 percent of Americans identify themselves as Republicans.

[Walter M. Brasch is a university professor of journalism, social issues columnist, and the author of 17 books. His current book is Sinking the Ship of State: The Presidency of George W. Bush, available from amazon.com, bn.com, and other stores. You may contact him through his website, www.walterbrasch.com]

  • DLS
    I anticipated the emergence of a horde of such people like Brasch, emerging from the darkness. Their real problem isn't with GOP politicians who behave like Dem politicians, or with "hypocrisy" (belonging in quotes because it is a word and term so misused by these people, who are _nobody) to misuse it). It's no surprise if many of them are actually gloating, and not because of the GOP missteps, because rather what they really don't like is the term and the concept underlying the term "family values." Why else would they subject this to their obscession and loathing?
  • DaGoat
    I doubt Republicans are any more or less morally bankrupt than Democrats. Although you could make the case they are being hypocritical, if you truly buy into the premise people's personal lives are not relevant to their professional capability then this article makes little sense.
  • AustinRoth
    OK, this is funny (from Ann Althouse's comment section):

    I fear that this is just the tip of the iceberg. Using mind control techniques developed on his home planet, Obama has unleashed an army of seductresses in order to eliminate the men who stand in the way of his reelection in 2012. Based on the timing of the Sanford and Ensign affairs, it appears he launched the offensive before the first primary of 2008.

    I know this seems like a far-fetched theory, but it will seem a lot more plausible should Huckabee or Pawlenty ever hold the confessional press conference.
  • DLS
    When it comes to personal misconduct (and, of course, politically-related misconduct) that may arise from holding or seeking political position,

    "I doubt Republicans are any more or less morally bankrupt than Democrats."

    Especially Washington, and likely the opportunity to move up the ranks to get to Washington, seems to corrupt all -- all are at least susceptible. Look at what happened to the post-1994 GOP "revolution" (as well as the personal conduct of some associated with this).

    In the case of Washington, it's an obvious consequence of Washington's being far too large and powerful.
  • Leonidas
    Mark Sanford was not a "Family Values" politician, his thing was fiscal conservatism, that hasn't changed and he still has my vote as governor of my State. I'd rather have a guy who cheats and can keep government spending down, than a faithful husband that can't. I don't feel like paying a price for fidelity of my elected officials, and getting someone who is not as capable of running the State. Better it suck to be the governors kids, than suck to be one of the that will inherit the debt of increased government spending all over the State.

    If the left wants to thump some Bibles and call foul on morality, *shrug*, I got better things to do, just like I do when the righties did it on Bill Clinton.
  • roro80
    Nah, I don't think Republicans cheat on their spouses any more or less than Democrats. People are people -- it's a terrible thing to do, but it does happen. I hope his wife and family can make it through ok. From a purely professional standpoint, were I one of his constituents, I'd be much more upset that he took off for a week without handing over the reins in case of an emergency.

    All that said, it would be nice if the Bible-belt social conservatives like the SC Gov could get their noses out of the personal lives of other people, stop trying to legislate "Christian Family Values", stop blabbering on about the "sanctity of marriage", stop the slut-shaming of young women, stop trying to keep birth control out of the hands of young people, and stop trying to argue for the sake of policy that sex and marriage are for the sole purpose of procreation. I really don't understand how someone who is obviously engaging in sex for the pleasure of it, someone who is cheating on his wife, someone who is most certainly using birth control, and someone who has defiled the sanctity of his own marriage and family can with any credibility make any of those issues part of his platform.
  • CStanley
    @roro:Aside from the fact that you misrepresent what social conservatives believe, and as far as I've seen you're misrepresenting Sanford by implying that he is a staunch social conservative, and then the line about 'slut shaming young girls has me scratching my head wondering what David Letterman has to do with all of this...

    To answer your basic question, perhaps people can simultaneously believe that certain behaviors are morally wrong (either with or without a concurrent belief that such behaviors should have bearing on legislation and policy) but still be human beings with faults and failings?

    Does a person have to have a clean driving record and never let the spedometer get over the limit in order to believe that we should have speed limits?

    I'm not saying that leaders shouldn't walk the walk, but failing to live up to one's standards is not the same as hypocrisy. A hypocrite doesn't actually believe what he says or pretends to believe, while the policitians like Sanford appear to believe that their actions are wrong even though they were too weak to resist the temptation.

    I guess I'd believe that certain commenters were more genuinely outraged about leaders who don't practice what they preach if the standard were also applied to people like Al Gore (inhabiting a minimansion and flying private jets, and paying indulgences) or other liberals who say one thing but do another.
  • roro80
    "perhaps people can simultaneously believe that certain behaviors are morally wrong (either with or without a concurrent belief that such behaviors should have bearing on legislation and policy) but still be human beings with faults and failings?"

    I don't have a problem with that -- we all fall short of our ideals at times; like I said above, people are people. I do have a problem with those people holding up higher standards for others than they hold themselves to. Now, it's possible that Sanford will realize through his personal experience that sometimes lightning strikes and you fall in love and it is an overwhelmingly powerful experience. This could very well change his understanding of why, for example, being gay really isn't a choice, and why teenagers have sex despite abstinence-only education and we should therefore teach them about contraceptives, why adultery shouldn't be a crime (as it is currently in SC -- brings up a whole 'nuther can of worms), why presidents shouldn't be impeached because of sexual indiscression, why there is more to sex than God and children. I don't know what will happen there, time will tell. His career's DOA anyway, so it's not impossible.

    "I guess I'd believe that certain commenters were more genuinely outraged..." I've been outraged at the policies he has espoused for a long time, and this doesn't in any way change how I feel about those policies. I hope it changes the way HE feels about them.

    "what David Letterman has to do with all of this..." Just because DL was the most recent to say something totally inappropriate in the slut-shaming category does not mean that he has a copywrite on the practice. And lefty commedians certainly aren't the ones constantly trying to put into policy laws that make it difficult for young women in this regard.

    "Aside from the fact that you misrepresent what social conservatives believe"

    How do you figure?

    "A hypocrite doesn't actually believe what he says or pretends to believe"

    I didn't use the word "hypocrite".
  • D. E.Rodriguez
    "Does a person have to have a clean driving record and never let the spedometer get over the limit in order to believe that we should have speed limits?"

    Absolutely not.

    But, is a politician who demonizes and legislates against gays and then turns out to either commit gay acts or be a gay himself a hypocrite? Absolutely yes!

    Is a person who preaches moral values, and family values and God-fearing, bible-thumping principles and then violates those principles, a hypocrite? Absolutely yes!

    Does a Party or a movement that has moral values, family values, religious principles etched in stone in its platform , runs on such a platform, rubs the opposition party's nose in it, hypocritical? Absolutely yes!"
  • StockBoySF
    I generally don't double-post comments, but this one is especially fitting for this post. But here goes:

    I suppose with the various sex scandals in the GOP these days their new motto is, "Make love not war."

    That's one way for them to make a comeback. :)
  • superdestroyer
    Are politicians who support forced busing while sending their own children to private school hypocrites? Are politicians who want to ban guns a hypocrite because they use armed security? Are politicians hypocrites when they are about merit but get their children into college using the family name?

    I believe politicians are really hypocrites when they refuse to be leaders. It they want to force others to do something, they should subject themselves or their families to the same. The most hypocritical politicians are the ones who pass laws that they expect others to follow but not themselves.

    Did Sanford sign legislation about infidelity? Has he ever fired someone for cheating on their spouses? How does that compare to the Democrats repeatly passing sexual harassment laws and then figuring out ways that those same laws to not apply to themselves?
  • D. E.Rodriguez
    "Did Sanford sign legislation about infidelity? Has he ever fired someone for cheating on their spouses?"

    Good subject for research. We'll soon find out
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC