<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will Dems Become Party of Fiscal Responsibility?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/36809/will-dems-become-party-of-fiscal-responsibility/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/36809/will-dems-become-party-of-fiscal-responsibility/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 20:23:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leonidas</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/36809/will-dems-become-party-of-fiscal-responsibility/comment-page-1/#comment-191142</link>
		<dc:creator>Leonidas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 17:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=36809#comment-191142</guid>
		<description>Here is a question.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How can anyone even consider the democrats being fiscally responsible when they are running up the biggest deficit in the history of the nation?  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://media3.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/graphic/2009/03/21/GR2009032100104.gif&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://media3.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a question.</p>
<p>How can anyone even consider the democrats being fiscally responsible when they are running up the biggest deficit in the history of the nation?  </p>
<p><a href="http://media3.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/graphic/2009/03/21/GR2009032100104.gif" rel="nofollow">http://media3.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLS</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/36809/will-dems-become-party-of-fiscal-responsibility/comment-page-1/#comment-190985</link>
		<dc:creator>DLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=36809#comment-190985</guid>
		<description>Pete -- my larger reply was an &quot;open letter&quot; about a &quot;pay-as-you-go&quot; initiative by Obama that already has seen some effort.  Don&#039;t expect much different from anyone in Congress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete &#8212; my larger reply was an &#8220;open letter&#8221; about a &#8220;pay-as-you-go&#8221; initiative by Obama that already has seen some effort.  Don&#39;t expect much different from anyone in Congress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leonidas</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/36809/will-dems-become-party-of-fiscal-responsibility/comment-page-1/#comment-190892</link>
		<dc:creator>Leonidas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 03:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=36809#comment-190892</guid>
		<description>Democrats and fiscal responsibility?  Now thats an oxymoron  So is Republicans and fiscal responsibility as of late with a few exceptions.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Get the far right out of my bedroom and the left out of my wallet and I&#039;ll be a happy camper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Democrats and fiscal responsibility?  Now thats an oxymoron  So is Republicans and fiscal responsibility as of late with a few exceptions.</p>
<p>Get the far right out of my bedroom and the left out of my wallet and I&#39;ll be a happy camper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaGoat</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/36809/will-dems-become-party-of-fiscal-responsibility/comment-page-1/#comment-190873</link>
		<dc:creator>DaGoat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 02:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=36809#comment-190873</guid>
		<description>There currently isn&#039;t a party of fiscal responsibility, and it&#039;s exceedingly unlikely the Democrats will become one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There currently isn&#39;t a party of fiscal responsibility, and it&#39;s exceedingly unlikely the Democrats will become one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nicrivera</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/36809/will-dems-become-party-of-fiscal-responsibility/comment-page-1/#comment-190827</link>
		<dc:creator>nicrivera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 22:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=36809#comment-190827</guid>
		<description>No.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Abel</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/36809/will-dems-become-party-of-fiscal-responsibility/comment-page-1/#comment-190799</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Abel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 20:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=36809#comment-190799</guid>
		<description>DLS -- did you not read my post?  I clearly do not accept the rhetoric at face value.  That was the point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DLS &#8212; did you not read my post?  I clearly do not accept the rhetoric at face value.  That was the point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLS</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/36809/will-dems-become-party-of-fiscal-responsibility/comment-page-1/#comment-190761</link>
		<dc:creator>DLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 18:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=36809#comment-190761</guid>
		<description>As with health care, so it is also propitious to visit Pew about the current fiscal state of affairs.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Stimulus (and other &quot;investments&quot; [sic]) vs. Deficit&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1264/stimulus-spending-deficit-reduction-polling&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1264/stimulus-spend...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As with health care, so it is also propitious to visit Pew about the current fiscal state of affairs.</p>
<p>Stimulus (and other &#8220;investments&#8221; [sic]) vs. Deficit</p>
<p><a href="http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1264/stimulus-spending-deficit-reduction-polling" rel="nofollow">http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1264/stimulus-spend&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLS</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/36809/will-dems-become-party-of-fiscal-responsibility/comment-page-1/#comment-190731</link>
		<dc:creator>DLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=36809#comment-190731</guid>
		<description>&quot;right rhetoric in proposing &#039;paygo&#039; legislation&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Pete,  _ p l e a s e _  go beyond the mere rhetoric and a) examine the details; b) consider the motives.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This initiative deliberately excludes vast amounts of spending -- it contains notorious exemptions.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Add to that that a number of Dems like Rangel will fight even this bogus fiscal restraint, as they have in the past.  Rangel, for one, is on public record as opposed to &quot;Pay-Go&quot; (an abbreviation of the correct term, &quot;pay-as-you-go,&quot; to make it easier and snappier to hear and say); Dems are opposed to displine.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We know what this is: an Obama-continued-campaign gimmick, a Dem-voters&#039;-feel-good gimmick, a pretence at responsibility (to make Obamaniacs and Dem voters feel good) that provides political coverer for, and a (bogus) rationalization (more directly, a fraudulent excuse) for future tax increases.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Let&#039;s see real balanced budgets (overall, no &quot;on-&quot; vs. &quot;off-&quot; budget gimmickry and evasion), some real fiscal responsibility (the Dems have wasted no time in showing themselves to be the worst when it comes to finance and willingness to buy popularity and _votes_; they already have dwarfed the GOP&#039;s poorest behavior, as was anticipated, was predictable), and let&#039;s see reform consist mainly of reduction in spending, not vast tax increases that put the federal government into heretorefore unknown size ranges of the GDP and fraction of the economy (while smug lib Dems look at Europe and giggle about US &quot;progress&quot;).  Let us see the federal government subject _itself_ to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles and reduce size and spending even _more_ than needed for present-day corrections in order to set finances right for the vast future liabilities (which someday may be reduced, somehow).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;right rhetoric in proposing &#39;paygo&#39; legislation&#8221;</p>
<p>Pete,  _ p l e a s e _  go beyond the mere rhetoric and a) examine the details; b) consider the motives.</p>
<p>This initiative deliberately excludes vast amounts of spending &#8212; it contains notorious exemptions.</p>
<p>Add to that that a number of Dems like Rangel will fight even this bogus fiscal restraint, as they have in the past.  Rangel, for one, is on public record as opposed to &#8220;Pay-Go&#8221; (an abbreviation of the correct term, &#8220;pay-as-you-go,&#8221; to make it easier and snappier to hear and say); Dems are opposed to displine.</p>
<p>We know what this is: an Obama-continued-campaign gimmick, a Dem-voters&#39;-feel-good gimmick, a pretence at responsibility (to make Obamaniacs and Dem voters feel good) that provides political coverer for, and a (bogus) rationalization (more directly, a fraudulent excuse) for future tax increases.</p>
<p>Let&#39;s see real balanced budgets (overall, no &#8220;on-&#8221; vs. &#8220;off-&#8221; budget gimmickry and evasion), some real fiscal responsibility (the Dems have wasted no time in showing themselves to be the worst when it comes to finance and willingness to buy popularity and _votes_; they already have dwarfed the GOP&#39;s poorest behavior, as was anticipated, was predictable), and let&#39;s see reform consist mainly of reduction in spending, not vast tax increases that put the federal government into heretorefore unknown size ranges of the GDP and fraction of the economy (while smug lib Dems look at Europe and giggle about US &#8220;progress&#8221;).  Let us see the federal government subject _itself_ to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles and reduce size and spending even _more_ than needed for present-day corrections in order to set finances right for the vast future liabilities (which someday may be reduced, somehow).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLS</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/36809/will-dems-become-party-of-fiscal-responsibility/comment-page-1/#comment-190728</link>
		<dc:creator>DLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=36809#comment-190728</guid>
		<description>Will things begin to fall up rather than down?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will things begin to fall up rather than down?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/36809/will-dems-become-party-of-fiscal-responsibility/comment-page-1/#comment-190694</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=36809#comment-190694</guid>
		<description>Yes, shortly after Americans become the people of fiscal responsibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, shortly after Americans become the people of fiscal responsibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

