An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Al Qaeda & Pakistan’s Nukes: Apocalypse Soon?

Al_qaeda_ leader Mustafa abu al-Yazid

It sounds like a routine alarm, but the things are getting serious. The question being asked in this part of the world is: Who would grab Pakistan’s nuclear weapons first…the Al Qaeda or the USA? To this speculation one may add an Aesop’s fable: Would it be the “monkey” India/Israel combo snatching the nukes away from the Al Qaeda/USA “cat” ?

Here is a categorical statement from Mustafa Abu al-Yazid (photo above), the leader of al Qaeda’s in Afghanistan, in an interview with Al Jazeera television: “Al Qaeda would use Pakistan’s nuclear weapons in its fight against the United States.”

Considering the increasing overt and covert support that the extremist fringe enjoys within the Pakistan polity, including the Army, this Al Qaeda threat assumes menacing proportions. All the generous aid that the US administration is pouring out to Pakistan in the hope of winning over this radicalized section is unlikely to work.

Expressing concern over Pakistan’s rapidly expanding nuclear arsenal, General Deepak Kapoor, India’s chief of army staff, recently called on the international community to prevail on Pakistan to cap its warheads at present levels.

India’s DNA newspaper comments: “Pakistan’s nuclear command and control passed into army hands when General Zia-ul-Haq overthrew Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto in a military coup d’etat on July 5, 1977 and has remained with the army ever since.

“With Taliban and jihadi terrorism having taken hold of large parts of Pakistan’s polity, there are serious doubts whether Pakistan’s nuclear warheads are safe from falling into jihadi hands.

“As long as the warheads are under the custody of the Pakistan army, such reservations are misplaced. However, in case there is ever a successful coup led by radical extremists with the support of disgruntled elements in the Pakistan army, or a colonels’ coup, it will be necessary to either capture the nuclear warheads or bomb the suspected nuclear storage sites to render the warheads ineffective.” More here…

Pakistan’s Dawn newspaper writes: “The correct position convincingly stated by scientist Pervez Hoodbhoy and human rights activists (call them pacifists if you like) is that nuclear weapons, in our situation, are not an asset as is generally said but a liability.

“Hillary Clinton’s declaration that a nuclear Pakistan is a ‘mortal threat to international security’ leaves one wondering whether one day, if the Taliban are not exterminated, America will intervene militarily to save the weapons from falling into their hands.

“After all the Americans keep firing missiles at the Taliban’s suspected hideouts in Pakistan but our army cannot, or does not want to, stop them. And our political leaders keep protesting only for the record.”

Meanwhile an American think tank says: “Pakistan’s military establishment remains focused on conventional conflict with its neighbor India, and cooperation between civilian and military leaders on counterterrorism action remains mixed, despite increasing domestic anxiety about the actions of militants in the country’s northwest.”

Here’s my earlier post on why USA overlooks Pakistan’s nuclear plans…See here…

  • lalit_cg
    Notice they did not say "will use it against India, or EU, or Russia, or China, or Japan." - only the US.

    Why is it nations whom the US has unilaterally labeled as "rogue states" such as Iran, North Korea, Venezuela, and the "stateless" Al Qaeda all want to develop nuclear weapons, directed primarily (if not exclusively) at the US?

    Could it be because they refuse to accept American delusions regarding global supremacy, and wish to put the US in its place?

    Maybe it is not such a bad thing for the world if a couple hundred nuclear weapons from Iran, North Korea, Venezuela, and Pakistan are perpetually trained against the US, 24/, 365 days a year - it will teach the Americans to behave.

    Nothing is more effective than the threat of extermination.
  • Silhouette
    There are certain aspects of Al Qaida and the US that get a little blurry. I'm referring to the string of seemingly coordinated bombings the day before Obama [secretly] landed in Baghdad...when he was talking of removing troops and Cheney wanted them there. Bombings = need to stay.

    So yeah, about Al Qaida and the US...little blurry there...
  • eejays
    Alqaeda and US are the two faces of same coin. Their existence is tied with each other.
  • DLS
    Now that we've been treated to a handful of delusions, let the real and mature world interject momentarily.

    Of course Pakistan's nukes aren't safe. Pakistan's government is not safe. This is a government containing members of the military that see nothing wrong with starting a nuclear war with India, even if Pakistan were to suffer more, and a government that already was in the news for some of them wanting to give nukes to the Taliban for safekeeping.

    This has nothing to do with anti-nuclear pathology, much less making the USA, Europe, and Israel the moral equivalents of (or in some failures' demented or distorted minds, worse than) rogue nations (not a term subject to serious, legitimate dispute), international miscreants and criminals.

    The USA is helping to keep the Pakistani government from failing for the same reason it does this in Saudi Arabia and Egypt (to a lesser extent, as they aren't quite as desperate and dysfunctional) -- the alternatives would almost certainly be much worse, and the last thing we need are nations among the most important or most vital to fail and become openly (if not "more openly" sometimes) ruled by terrorists.
  • lalit_cg
    It would appear DLS's "real and mature world' comprises almost exclusively of such who childishly revel in exercising a grammatical tyranny over the English language of the sort that would put the Taliban's stranglehold over SWAT and parts of Afghanistan to shame!

    The fact is it is the US that was responsible for fostering and creating the Taliban and as a consequence the proto-Al-Qaeda in response to the Russians invading Afghanistan in 1979; it was the US that was responsible for the creation of the 44th parallel artificially dividing what was once an undivided Korea; it was the US too that was responsible for brazenly and oblivious to realpolitik, cultivating the deposed Shah of Iran, Raza Pahelvi! Surely even DLS with his perspicacity would notice that these are precisely the regions that brazenly seek American destruction.

    Now (and in the words of a famous African-American pastor who almost derailed Obama's presidential campaign) America's chickens have come home to roost, and what does it do? - it disingenuously (and unilaterally) launches a so-called "war on terror" and takes 30 "unwilling" nations along for the ride! Talk about dysfunctionality! It is they who have an unfortunate habit of opening several Pandora's boxes at once!

    Notice I haven't even begun to mention desperate American interference (and pathological incompetence) in Cuba, Nicaragua, Vietnam, Venezuela, Kuwait, Saudi, Egypt, Palestine, and most recently Georgia. It is America's own delusional sins that are returning to haunt it! Why blame others? As for Pakistan, it was a failed nation to begin with, and always will be, regardless of any number of sham elections they may choose to hold under US auspices.

    Why must the rest of the world feel threatened by Al Qaeda or the Taliban, when their stated aim is the destruction of their "Great Enemy" the US (at least to begin with) - more specifically, why must India? Unlike the US I would hope the Indian leadership would be prepared to use our nuclear deterrent ruthlessly, if reluctantly, in case the Al Qaeda or Taliban (or indeed Pakistan itself) are foolish enough to contemplate any misadventures in the sub-continent.

    I hope that is a sufficient reality check for DLS.

    Let me now return to wiping away my crocodile tears shed in sympathy for the US.
  • lalit_cg
    Correction: Koreas' border and demilitarized zone are on the 38th parallel north, and not 44th as mentioned in my post above.
  • amirwayn
    Al-Qaeda is nothing but a CIA's compaign name against muslims. US is having bad eye on Paksitan's nukes. By any hooks or crooks US is trying to show the world the nukes are not safe. Nukes are not stones or guns you fetch from shop dealer and fire it up. There is a completed command & control system which have several layers to trigger the nuke.
    Instead US look inside its own land where it couldn't stop leaking the secrete documents describe the secrete US nuclear sites.
    US doesn't want anyways an Islamic country with huge nuclear capabiliy of nuke and delivery system. US MUST keep in mind, if it try to sneak over Pakistan nukes, half the nukes will be thrown on Delhi & Telaviv and remaining to Washington DC. And their command system doesn't require any approval from (US backed pupit) Govt for such actions.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC