Comments on: Obama To Name Cyber Czar To Combat Cyber Terrorism: A Can Of Digital Worms?

By: drlucy

drlucy — Wed, 10 Jun 2009 01:29:18 +0000

I don't undestand why we need czars to do Obama and
Congress's job: isn't this type of thing what they are elected to do? If we need
all these czars maybe they should take the place of
Congress:

How easily bribed will these non-confimed non-security clearence sucking of the government
tit bunch of czars be considering the rats (pardon me rats) in Congress?

By: superdestroyer

superdestroyer — Sat, 30 May 2009 23:38:37 +0000

There will probably lead to regulations and requirements that companies like Oracle and Microsoft can meet but that smaller companies cannot afford.

This goes along with the demand for testing and recording keeping on toys by the CPSC and proposed for food by the FDA. The regulations are written to allow big companies to put little companies out of business.

By: Silhouette

Silhouette — Sat, 30 May 2009 17:07:23 +0000

No, he is taking an excellent step towards preserving our national security under the cloak of monitoring petty crime [to minimize panic]. Our infrastructure is extremely vulnerable since we started building its foundation on cyber-technology. There's more than one way to skin a cat and our adversaries [factually, Iran, China, N. Korea, Russia et al.] damn well know it.

We should've had a cyber-czar ages ago. Good for Obama. Now if he would just pull away from the red-caped distractions of the world bullfight we've been lured into, we might actually have a shot at continued cohesion as a nation..

By: chicagotrance

chicagotrance — Sat, 30 May 2009 07:49:05 +0000

Anything gov't. touches becomes a disaster, we should know from experience. This first foot-in-the-door will lead to eventual censorship in the name of G-d knows what agenda cloaked in liberal BS rhetoric.
Obama is taking us down a slippery slope – this is a man who cannot be trusted, a con artist & fraud.