An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Newton’s Third Law of Politics

The subject of my Pajama’s Media column this week deals with how Sir Isaac Newton would craft his basic laws if he had chosen to study politics rather than mathematics. Here’s number three:

ON matters of warfare in the political arena, when seeking equal footing for the battle, each issue-based action must be balanced by an equal and opposite reaction.

Do all political issues elicit an “equal and opposite” reaction from potential opponents? Or do traditionally “social conservative” issues tend to generate the biggest flames while Democratic Party platform planks offer an opportunity to a broader coalition of single issue groups? These are the questions I grapple with this weekend. Chime in with your own take on it.

  • StockBoySF
    Wasn't it Machiavelli in the Prince who advised that leaders should not only destroy their enemies, but also their friends and supporters so there would be no one left to challenge the leader?

    Doesn't really work that way in a democracy, though the Republicans are sure trying- whether it's the Republicans' belief of "us v. them" or telling party members that if they even vote with the opposition they will lose the support of the party leaders and any money for re-election efforts. These actions show that the GOP expects 100% party loyalty and if you're not, then you're an enemy.

    To me this is overkill. And does not advance Americans' interests.

    The Dems don't demonize members who vote differently and the Dems are open to supporting new ideas which advance the interests of Americans. Whereas the GOP just has a set agenda that can't see reality.

    So what it ("Do all political issues elicit an “equal and opposite” reaction from potential opponents?") gets down to is how open-minded people are. The Republican leadership is not open-minded and on social issues wants to control your life- they want you to be straight, anti-abortion Christians who will blindly follow the GOP leadership. The Democratic leadership is much more open-minded and doesn't care whether you're straight or not, for or against abortion, or Christian or not. Just to name a few.

    Because the Republican leadership is so rigid in their thinking they see anything else as a threat (including expelling people from the GOP if they don't vote the right way). Generally when people see threats they act much more to the extreme in the name of self-preservation than those who simply see others as having different opinions. Which the far left does see the Republicans as a threat and does act to that extreme. But the Democratic leadership is not the far left, whereas the Republican leadership is to the far right.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC