Judge Sonia Sotomayor, who is said to have the inside track to replace Supreme Court Justice David Souter, is being flogged pretty hard on the intertubes for, among other things, saying that as a woman she brings certain sensitivities to the job. You know, like knowing what it’s like to be discriminated against on the basis of gender.
I can’t quite put my finger on why this seems to be such an outrage except that the people threatening to jump out of windows over it are men who, I can only imagine, feel threatened by women’s sensitivities.
Such was the case when Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said the same thing earlier this year.
And while Sandra Day O’Connor, the high court’s first woman justice, might not have said as much in public, a cursory examination of where she came down in major cases in which gender played a role shows that she too had sensitivities. Or at least got in touch with them as she became increasingly alienated from the Republican Party as it marched into the Dark Ages during the Dubya years.
At the risk of being exiled in perpetuity to a Hooters, this sensitivity thing is not a two-way street.
It was, is and will remain a man’s world for the foreseeable future in and outside of courtrooms. While woman judges typically understand the sensitivities of their male peers and men in general because that is part and parcel of surviving in that world, it is the rare male in my view who not only understands a woman’s sensitivities, especially a woman wielding a gavel, but actually appreciates those sensitivities, as well.
John Edwards has, of course, literally and figuratively screwed his political career — including a shot at the White House — less by having an affair with Rielle Hunter than his denying that it took place in the face of ample evidence that it had.
What that were the end of it. But it is not, and the two women in his life have some pretty serious sensitivity issues of their own.
Wife Elizabeth Edwards has decided that terminal cancer should not be a bar to writing an intimate account of how her husband deceived her, how she deceived herself and how it ouch-ouch-ouch hurt.
I wish Mrs. Edwards only the best as she prepares to meet her maker, but do suppose that beyond what is happening to her body is the pain of having suborned her own sensitivities by contributing to her husband’s phony public persona and then circling her wagon when confronted with the truth.
Then there is Rielle, who is not only trashed in Mrs. Edwards’ tell-all, but seems to have finally realized that Mr. Edwards was insensitively speaking with his male appendage and not his heart when he fathered their love child and promised to remain in her life.
Shaun Mullen is a former The Moderate Voice columnist. Over a long career with newspapers, this award-winning editor and reporter covered the Vietnam War, O.J. Simpson trials, Clinton impeachment circus and coming of Osama bin Laden, among many other big stories. He blogs at Kiko’s House.
[...] isn’t enough. In the same manner that color bears great significance in our daily lives, A Musing On Womanly Sensitivities: Sonia, Ruth, Sandra, Elizabeth & Reille – themoderatevoice.com 05/08/2009 By SHAUN MULLEN GUEST VOICE Judge Sonia Sotomayor, who is said to [...]
If we look at the history of the supreme court, something like 96% of the justices since the beginning of the institution have been white and male. I feel that it is desperately important to have a variety of voices on the court. As this post points out, women — and people of color, or from any other minority group — do actually come from a different place in their life experiences. Those experiences are often so deeply engrained that no amount of training or intellectual study can replace them.
Amanda Marcotte recently said something that has stuck with me: “Much of what the Supreme Court does is protect the rights of its citizens against being encroached on by others, and that means that they’ll often be looking at protecting people who are under attack for being non-white, female, or gay. The notion that it’s acceptable to have a group of mostly straight white men examine these cases smacks too much of, 'We have evaluated ourselves and found that we’ve done nothing wrong.' “
I honestly think that a non-white, and/or non-man person would be better qualified than an otherwise similarly-experienced white man for just this reason.
Ms. Sotomayor believes that the government can and should discriminate on the basis of race, gender, and ethnicity even though the constitution says that the government cannot. If the left wants to discriminate on the basis of race, then let it propose a constitutional amendment making group benefit and group punishment legal. Until that happens, individuals like Ms. Sotomayor have not business being a judge.
Does wearing that thing limit your peripheral vision? Just curious…