<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some Compelling Math For Republicans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/30569/some-compelling-math-for-republicans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/30569/some-compelling-math-for-republicans/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:11:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mlhradio</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/30569/some-compelling-math-for-republicans/comment-page-1/#comment-182889</link>
		<dc:creator>mlhradio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 20:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=30569#comment-182889</guid>
		<description>Even a broken clock (jwest) is right twice a day.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When in power, the Democrats eventually &quot;overreach&quot;.  Same thing happens when the Republicans are in power.  I see politics in America somewhat like a giant pendulum - once the political winds sway too far to the left or the right, they inevitably will swing back.  And the farther it swings in one direction, the hard and faster the reciprocal swing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s not a matter of whether or not the Democrats will get full of themselves - it&#039;s just a matter of how much, and how fast.  The neocons did their best to push that pendulum as far to the right as possible and keep it there -- well, we saw how well that worked for them.  One could argue exactly when the pendulum reached its farthest right point - I think the breaking point was in the fall of 2005, on the day the levees broke in New Orleans.  Since that point the pendulum has been swinging farther and farther left, and from all polls and indications it appears to *still* be edging left even today.  How far will it go?  When will it stop?  We won&#039;t really know until after the fact - but I am convinced that it eventually will swing back to the right.  Two years, four years, six years from now we may have switched from a center-left nation back to a center-right nation once again - and the cycle starts all over again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even a broken clock (jwest) is right twice a day.</p>
<p>When in power, the Democrats eventually &#8220;overreach&#8221;.  Same thing happens when the Republicans are in power.  I see politics in America somewhat like a giant pendulum &#8211; once the political winds sway too far to the left or the right, they inevitably will swing back.  And the farther it swings in one direction, the hard and faster the reciprocal swing.</p>
<p>It&#39;s not a matter of whether or not the Democrats will get full of themselves &#8211; it&#39;s just a matter of how much, and how fast.  The neocons did their best to push that pendulum as far to the right as possible and keep it there &#8212; well, we saw how well that worked for them.  One could argue exactly when the pendulum reached its farthest right point &#8211; I think the breaking point was in the fall of 2005, on the day the levees broke in New Orleans.  Since that point the pendulum has been swinging farther and farther left, and from all polls and indications it appears to *still* be edging left even today.  How far will it go?  When will it stop?  We won&#39;t really know until after the fact &#8211; but I am convinced that it eventually will swing back to the right.  Two years, four years, six years from now we may have switched from a center-left nation back to a center-right nation once again &#8211; and the cycle starts all over again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick E</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/30569/some-compelling-math-for-republicans/comment-page-1/#comment-182886</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 20:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=30569#comment-182886</guid>
		<description>I agree that the GOP is not doomed, I do not expect them to remain out of power forever.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But most of the blue/Democratic states I mentioned are pretty close to solid for Dems even without swing voters.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So while certainly the Democrats will overreach and give the GOP openings, even a 2-1 GOP split in the tossup states would still mean a more or less 50/50 Senate.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you look at the pattern of the 20th century (say 1932-2000) you had a period of about 50 years or so where the Democrats tended to be in the majority but the GOP sometimes took control. Then you had the period of back and forth control. My analysis merely is saying that the future is likely to resemble that 1932-1980 period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the GOP is not doomed, I do not expect them to remain out of power forever.</p>
<p>But most of the blue/Democratic states I mentioned are pretty close to solid for Dems even without swing voters.</p>
<p>So while certainly the Democrats will overreach and give the GOP openings, even a 2-1 GOP split in the tossup states would still mean a more or less 50/50 Senate.</p>
<p>If you look at the pattern of the 20th century (say 1932-2000) you had a period of about 50 years or so where the Democrats tended to be in the majority but the GOP sometimes took control. Then you had the period of back and forth control. My analysis merely is saying that the future is likely to resemble that 1932-1980 period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bellisaurius</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/30569/some-compelling-math-for-republicans/comment-page-1/#comment-182883</link>
		<dc:creator>bellisaurius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 20:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=30569#comment-182883</guid>
		<description>Given that political parties are composed of people, who are capable of feedback, why would the republican party vanish when it can simply reinvent itself around a new set of issues, or at least a suite of problems that it feels it can solve better than the other guy. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Individuals may be hardline, but given time, groups of people can change their opinions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given that political parties are composed of people, who are capable of feedback, why would the republican party vanish when it can simply reinvent itself around a new set of issues, or at least a suite of problems that it feels it can solve better than the other guy. </p>
<p>Individuals may be hardline, but given time, groups of people can change their opinions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elrod</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/30569/some-compelling-math-for-republicans/comment-page-1/#comment-182882</link>
		<dc:creator>elrod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 19:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=30569#comment-182882</guid>
		<description>jwest is right. The Democrats will overreach. The only question is how badly will they overreach, and will the Republicans be considered a viable enough opposition to take advantage.    At this point, a Democratic overreach would lead merely to low turnout and little turnover. The GOP hasn&#039;t offered a compelling reason right now for swing voters - few as they are - to switch to to the GOP.  As long as the GOP continues to press to the right, the chances of them taking advantage of a Democratic overreach diminish. This isn&#039;t 1994 anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jwest is right. The Democrats will overreach. The only question is how badly will they overreach, and will the Republicans be considered a viable enough opposition to take advantage.    At this point, a Democratic overreach would lead merely to low turnout and little turnover. The GOP hasn&#39;t offered a compelling reason right now for swing voters &#8211; few as they are &#8211; to switch to to the GOP.  As long as the GOP continues to press to the right, the chances of them taking advantage of a Democratic overreach diminish. This isn&#39;t 1994 anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rudi</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/30569/some-compelling-math-for-republicans/comment-page-1/#comment-182857</link>
		<dc:creator>Rudi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 16:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=30569#comment-182857</guid>
		<description>LOL jwest - what do you call the over reach of Nixon and W? Please explain when the Democrats invaded and over reached like the  Schiavo probate case.  Family and state rights with Schiavo - Right!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL jwest &#8211; what do you call the over reach of Nixon and W? Please explain when the Democrats invaded and over reached like the  Schiavo probate case.  Family and state rights with Schiavo &#8211; Right!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwest</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/30569/some-compelling-math-for-republicans/comment-page-1/#comment-182832</link>
		<dc:creator>jwest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 14:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=30569#comment-182832</guid>
		<description>There are very few things in this world that are absolute certainties, but one that is inarguable is that Democrats overreach when in power.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All the math you need to know was laid out in 1994, when the GOP took both houses, numerous governorships, state houses etc. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Four years ago even the NY Times was writing about a “permanent Republican majority”, and now we have people calculating with geometric precision how the Democrats are securely in power for the next 100 years.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Right.  Good luck with that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are very few things in this world that are absolute certainties, but one that is inarguable is that Democrats overreach when in power.</p>
<p>All the math you need to know was laid out in 1994, when the GOP took both houses, numerous governorships, state houses etc. </p>
<p>Four years ago even the NY Times was writing about a “permanent Republican majority”, and now we have people calculating with geometric precision how the Democrats are securely in power for the next 100 years.</p>
<p>Right.  Good luck with that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elrod</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/30569/some-compelling-math-for-republicans/comment-page-1/#comment-182824</link>
		<dc:creator>elrod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 13:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/?p=30569#comment-182824</guid>
		<description>Good analysis!  Nebraska probably belongs in the 1-1 category as it&#039;s had a Democratic Senator for decades now. It also gave one of its Electoral Votes to Obama this year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good analysis!  Nebraska probably belongs in the 1-1 category as it&#39;s had a Democratic Senator for decades now. It also gave one of its Electoral Votes to Obama this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

