An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Eric Cantor: Let’s Not “Overreact” to the Economic Crisis

You would think that after Barack Obama’s resounding victory in November, and with his job approval and favorable ratings at 60% and 69%, respectively, Republican leaders would recognize that the “tired old policies of the past” are the ones the public just rejected — not the ones we’ve been suffering under for the eight years prior to the election.

Instead, they seem to be leapfrogging over each other to see which of them can do the most damage to the GOP’s chances of coming back from irrelevance. As of yesterday, the so-called “alternative” Republican budget was the latest example. Today, there is a new one: Eric Cantor told reporters at a breakfast hosted by the Christian Science Monitor that Democrats are “overreacting” to the economic crisis.

Brian Beutler provides the full transcript of Cantor’s remarks and thinks that, in context, Cantor was making a general statement and not referring specifically to Democrats:

Here’s the full context of Cantor’s remarks on overreaction:

As far as Rush [Limbaugh], Rush has got ideas, he’s got following, he believes in the conservative principles that many of us believe in, of lower taxes of making sure that we turn back towards and focus on entrepreneurialism in this country, to promoting innovation, and not stamping that out by overreacting, if you will, which this town often does, to crisis.

This may be a backhanded critique of Democrats, but it’s less overt than the Politico piece reported–Cantor was boosting for Rush (who loathes Democrats) and was criticizing Washington (now controlled by Democrats), but did not say that Democrats per se over react to crises.

True, but that is somewhat of a distinction without a difference — as Beutler notes, criticizing Washington is pretty much synonymous with criticizing Democrats, given that Democrats control the White House and both houses of Congress.

And criticizing Democrats for “overreacting” to the economic crisis may not be the best way to gain favor with the American people at this time:

Cantor’s timing could have been better. While he was accusing Democratic officials of caring too much about economic growth and ending the crisis, the Labor Department reported that “initial claims for unemployment insurance rose to a seasonally adjusted 669,000 from the previous week’s revised figure of 657,000. That total was above analysts’ expectations and the highest in more than 26 years.”

With that in mind, Cantor handed Democrats quite a gift this morning. For every American who has lost a job, lost their healthcare, lost their home, and lost their savings, the majority party has a simple message: the Republican leadership believes Democrats are “overreacting” to the crisis.

It’s hard to imagine what Cantor was thinking. Democrats care too much about fixing the economy? That’s the pitch from the House Republican leadership?

Steve updates his post:

Cantor’s office is arguing, aggressively, that he wasn’t referring to Democrats when he talked about the “overreaction.” It’s unclear, though, who else he might have been referencing.

D-Day adds:

I think Steve Benen is largely right. Regardless of the specific context of Cantor’s remarks, he is broadly saying that the biggest worry at a time of massive unemployment and financial turmoil is that policymakers do too much. Therefore doing nothing, by contrast, is seen as a greater virtue than doing something. I just don’t think that the 669,000 people tossed out of work and onto unemployment last week would agree.

Oliver Willis (whose new mast banner graphic is pretty darn cool) says, “Republicans remain completely and absolutely out of touch with the people.”

Yes, and also absolutely clueless. Cantor said what he said on the same day that the new unemployment numbers were released:

Just a couple hours ago, Chris posted the latest gloomy economic news: Jobless claims hit 26 year high.

But, one of the top Republican leaders thinks that Democrats are “overreacting” in their attempts to fix the economy. Overreacting?
[...]
If Eric Cantor ever took one step outside of the Capitol Hill bubble, he’d know that people are suffering — and want their government to act.

Matthew Yglesias echoed many others when he asked “if Cantor really wants to repeat the ‘fundamentals of the economy are strong’ fiasco of last fall?”

It did not go over well when McCain said it, and it’s not going to go off any better now.

  • Don Quijote
    What crisis?

    We have cheap labor, getting cheaper by the hour, and cheap money, what could be better? Oh yeah, lots of cheap assets hitting the market...

    Heaven, if you have money...
  • DdW
    I keep hearing and reading about this latest Republican mantra of accusing Democrats of "overreacting" more and more, after they themslves--with Limbaugh and Hannity leading the GOP pack and PAC--have been shouting from the rooftops that the sky is falling, that the country and the economy are going to smithereens.

    They are up to something, as ususal.
  • elrod
    The problem with the "overreacting" comment is that it sounds like "nation of whiners" and "fundamentals of our economy are strong." It may be true, in Republicans' opinion, that the Democrats are exploiting this crisis to advance a radical agenda. But when you use terms like "overreacting", you run the risk of looking out of touch.
  • DaGoat
    For me the one "tired policy of the past" I'd like to see go is fiscal irresponsibility, something the GOP dropped the ball on and the Democrats seem eager to perpetuate. I think many fiscal conservatives see the 2000-2008 period as a failure and abandonment of basic economic responsibility, and the Democrat's proposals represent a worsening of that rather than a change for the better.

    If the Democrats are talking about better oversight on banks, brokerages, hedge funds, mortgages, etc then those are changes that make sense and I could get behind. It seems to me though Democrats are using the "tired old policies" excuse to spend a lot of money they don't have. I understand the need for stimulus spending but face it the new budget is a lot more than that.

    What happened to the Democrats criticisms of widening deficits and commitment to pay-go? Were they just campaign rhetoric? When you say "tired old policies" could you be more specific, because the tired old policies I'd like to see go may not be the same ones you're talking about.
  • JayDickB
    As in this case, current Republicans often have good points to make but are completely inept in making them.

    For conservatives, the Democrats have overreacted in the sense that they have taken many actions in the name of correcting the financial downturn that will do nothing to improve the economy and will probably make it worse.

    "Overreaction" is not a good word to describe this situation. A better way do describe it would be to say that Democrats took a bad situation and made it worse.

    Republicans should also press the point that Democrats had a very large role in creating the financial downturn by insisting that mortgages be issued that could not be repaid and by making it very profitable for banks and mortgage companies to originate such mortgages without any of the risks normally associated with originating bad mortgages. When banks found that they could sell sub-prime mortgages (or derivatives backed by such mortgages) to Fannie and Freddie (and others) and make a lot of money, what would you expect them to do?

    Other parties also had roles in this mess, but the Democrats' hands are not clean. The public needs to be reminded of this, frequently, but the Republicans don't seem to be able to do it. A largely hostile press doesn't help any.
  • HemmD
    JayDickB

    Talking points aren't necessarily constructed from objective truth.

    Fanny and Freddy got into sub-primes late in the game. They held about 15% of the sub-primes issued. That leaves 85% to the private sector who actively lobbied the Bush administration for loosened standards in loan requirement standards through Phil Graham, who was instrumental in getting these laws changed.

    If your talking points are supposed to do more than obscure the truth and make Republicans blameless, let me know.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC