An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Market Recovering. Economy Not. A Problem?.

The stock market is on a tear. It has had one of the biggest four-week advances ever. Like episodes of Seinfeld, however, this surge is pretty much about nothing.

Street watchers, of course, are obliged to assign a reason for the inherently silly or foolish gyrations that often seize hold of the professional traders who handle so much of other people’s money. And they have thus given a number of reasons for the present spasm: These include the view that the deep recession may have bottomed. A slew of happy talk from analysts whose record for bad calls in the past is legendary. A few very modest upticks in home sales and factory orders in these still horrendously depressed sectors. What may or may not be actionable promises by G-20 attendees. And on days when there was no hook whatever to justify another spike, the explanation for such a spike usually came down to something like “the bulls were on a rampage today”—a colorful anthropomorphic description that never fails to evoke an image of maddened bovine males goring the gizzards out of hapless declawed bears.

In ordinary times, whatever explanations were used to justify market bull runs, the upticks themselves would be a good thing. They enhance stock investor’s worth, so badly hurt in recent months previous market plunge. These upswings also tend to boost consumer confidence generally, certainly a good thing in any ordinary recessionary time.

Except, today is not an ordinary recessionary time.

There hasn’t been so much animosity in this country (and indeed around the world) between Main Street and Wall Street since the great depression. The extraordinary public outcries against AIG and other financial institutions’ bonuses was a clear demonstration of that fact. And here we are today with unemployment still rising, foreclosures still soaring, modern-day Hoovervilles appearing around the country, the number of food stamp recipients proliferating, and all manner of other signs that things are not simply very, very bad for so many people, but getting worse for a great many.

That’s where we are. And the beasts of the bourse, as they used to be called, appear to be making out like bandits again.

Long time market watchers will tell you that stock markets generally start going up about six months before overall economic improvement becomes apparent. Is that what’s happening now? Gee, I hope so. I really do, because like so many of my fellow Americans I’m hurting financially these days.

But if that doesn’t happen, and if the Obama stimulus package that is just now coming on line doesn’t materially better an awful lot of lives very quickly, watch out. Today’s bull market will not be seen as a cause for celebration, but another finger in the eye of a gullible public.

http://www.wallstreetpoet.com

  • Ricorun
    michael: But if that doesn’t happen, and if the Obama stimulus package that is just now coming on line doesn’t materially better an awful lot of lives very quickly, watch out. Today’s bull market will not be seen as a cause for celebration, but another finger in the eye of a gullible public.

    That's the essential quesion, isn't it -- if? So, what's the alternative? Hmmm...

    I will be the first to admit that I don't know what the answer is, and I can't come up with one myself. The best I can do is follow the logic of whatever plan is offered. But I have to say, the GOP plan makes considerably less sense to me than Obama's. I'm not saying Obama's plan excites me. If nothing else it requires a successful pivot sometime in the future that may not be politically possible. All I'm saying is that the GOP plan appears to me toxic right from the get go, both economically and politically -- with no indication that anything will change, ever. I dunno, but I'm not inclined to assume the public is that altogether gullible. Rather, in large part, they -- like me -- look to leadership if to do nothing else but simplify the viable alternatives.
  • AustinRoth
    As a general rule, coming out of a recession, the market is a leading indicator by 12 - 18 months. So, if the trends hold, that is indeed good news.
  • elrod
    Another possibility is that the recent bear was overdone - the market was oversold and is now returning to where it should be given anticipated profits.

    Of course, that's anyone's guess. The whole rally started the day Vikram Pandit announced that Citigroup had a better January and February than people believed. That was taken as a sign that the government was not going to nationalize the banks. Geithner's public-private plan - with details - only confirmed the hopes that the government would not nationalize. We've learned since then that the gains at Citi and BoA were based on AIG payouts and not actual operations. But that helped turn the psychology around a bit.

    Another possibility is national psychology, including that from Washington. Obama deftly used the "catastrophe" of recession to get support for the stimulus bill. That language may have daunted investors. Since passage of the stimulus, Obama clearly feels his role is to talk up - and not down - the economy. (I don't blame Obama for this, by the way. All leaders talk up or down a crisis depending on their own agenda). That may - I stress, may - have had an effect on changing market psychology. The percentage of Americans who believe we are on the right track has also gone up since passage of the stimulus.

    We'll see though. I thought the GM announcement would send the market back down again. That it didn't show this rally to be more robust than I imagined.
  • yetanothermoderatevoice
    AustinRoth: yes, it's true that the market tends to be a leading indicator. What I can't fathom is why, in this case. E.g.
    1. Do we know anything more about the solvency of banks than we did a couple of weeks ago? (especially given that FASB just loosened the accounting rules)
    2. The exposure of Western Europe to the equivalent of sub-prime sovereign debt in Eastern Europe is staggering.
    3. Chinese exports dropped something like 25%.
    4. There is a year hangover in housing inventory.

    One intriguing idea is that implicit stimulus of the contraction in oil prices - James Hamilton has a post up today on that. So things may be just grim, not apocalyptic.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC