Comments on: Political Troubles Mount For Sarah Palin

By: GeorgeSorwell

GeorgeSorwell — Fri, 03 Apr 2009 13:36:05 +0000

Really, isn't it all McCain's teleprompter's fault?

By: Deo

Deo — Fri, 03 Apr 2009 08:23:59 +0000

IMPOSSIBLE……..
sorry for the spelling mistake.

By: Deo

Deo — Fri, 03 Apr 2009 08:21:42 +0000

Well, it´s the Palin family that you GET…and they have turned out to be the KEYSTONE COPS.
It´s impossibel at this point…Sarah GET OFF THE STAGE!
You can talk about Obama, Pelosi, you can talk about anything and anybody you want. It doesn´t change the fact that Palin is revealed as a major F**K Up. People are clinging to a corpse here.

By: JimTreacher

JimTreacher — Fri, 03 Apr 2009 08:20:07 +0000

My comment regarding McCain was referring to the idea that Palin was somehow a drag on the ticket. Yeah, that many people voted for him because of his star power.

By: AustinRoth

AustinRoth — Fri, 03 Apr 2009 04:31:26 +0000

Jim -

Cool! Great to have you here. Been reading you for a long time (thanks to Glenn).

By: rainboskies

rainboskies — Fri, 03 Apr 2009 04:00:30 +0000

JimTreacher

If comment regarding McCain was referring to my post, my point was that McCain was vetted. Obama was not. Ooze on over to TheSteadyDrip.com. Get enlighted!!

By: JimTreacher

JimTreacher — Fri, 03 Apr 2009 03:38:23 +0000

At your service!

By: AustinRoth

AustinRoth — Fri, 03 Apr 2009 03:00:07 +0000

Jim Teacher? As in "Mother, May I Sleep with Treacher"? http://jimtreacher.com/

By: JimTreacher

JimTreacher — Fri, 03 Apr 2009 02:41:39 +0000

So you're saying that 60 million people voted for John McCain because he's John McCain.

Moderation voiced!

By: GreenDreams

GreenDreams — Fri, 03 Apr 2009 01:03:31 +0000

hey, I like the idea of conspiracy theory wingnuts representing the GOP here. Keep it up.

By: GeorgeSorwell

GeorgeSorwell — Fri, 03 Apr 2009 00:00:10 +0000

Daniel Larison is a blogger for the American Conservative magazine.

By: AustinRoth

AustinRoth — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 19:04:14 +0000

Rudi -

Not familiar with Larison.

By: Rudi

Rudi — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 18:16:46 +0000

Neither Sully and Larison are Republicans, but they are both conservatives. AR – You ignored Larison, he's on this liberals daily reading list.

By: rainboskies

rainboskies — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 17:15:24 +0000

You will also read she has evidence that Obama has many different SSNs; both him and wife hold about 30 jobs…none listed on tax returns.(To receive campaign funds, he was a paid “director/speaker/consulant” at numerous “companies” to get around campaign laws) He even holds a SSN of a man who would be 118 years old!! I dont know how many adresses he has for himself. You gotta read that site. Unbelievable that he thinks he can get away with it all. People, I think the proverbial poop is gonna hit the fan!!

By: rainboskies

rainboskies — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 16:53:16 +0000

“eye-opener” should not have been hyperlinked…sorry dont know how that happened..

By: rainboskies

rainboskies — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 16:45:00 +0000

HemmD

An eye-opener.....TheSteadyDrip.com Where you will read that a clerk at the Sup Ct tampered with a case and erased it from the Jan 22 docket. Mrs. Taitiz personally handed her case to Judge Roberts at a public lecture 2 weeks ago. Read it...I dare you

By: AustinRoth

AustinRoth — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 16:43:09 +0000

Re: rainboskies

Please do not feed the Nirthers. Do not talk to the Nirthers, do not taunt the Nirthers. Play dead, and maybe they will go away.

By: AustinRoth

AustinRoth — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 16:41:40 +0000

Rudi -

Sully, despite his proclamations, isn't a Republican either. Hell, he doesn't even count as a RINO!

By: Rudi

Rudi — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 16:34:35 +0000

And isn't it funny that it is only the Democrats worrying about Palin's future political stock.
Larison and Sullivan aren't Democrats.
Larison - Palin

By: HemmD

HemmD — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 16:05:19 +0000

rainboskies

Check out WorldnetDaily. They've seen it. The Supreme Court – that rabid group of liberals – dismissed the case ithout comment. That means they see nothing wrong in his birth.

I haven't seen it, I haven't seen nuclear fission either.
It appears you haven't seen logical argument, but here it is.