
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Derivative At The End Of The World</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/27463/the-derivative-at-the-end-of-the-world/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/27463/the-derivative-at-the-end-of-the-world/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 16:53:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GreenDreams</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/27463/the-derivative-at-the-end-of-the-world/comment-page-1/#comment-177978</link>
		<dc:creator>GreenDreams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 21:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/27463/the-derivative-at-the-end-of-the-world/#comment-177978</guid>
		<description>Actually, emissions trading is not that &quot;untried&quot;. It has been effective in the US in reducing acid rain under the Sulfur dioxide trading system started in 1990. The program has cut acid rain by about 50% and the Great Lakes are recovering as a result. Like carbon trading, it allows a slower moving company to buy emission credits from a faster moving competitor or share in the savings of new lower-emission facilities. It is estimated that the cost of the 50% savings was 80% lower than a simple per-plant emission standard. In the case of carbon trading, it allows a polluter to buy credits from an accredited pollution saving program, such as sparing a primary forest, planting new trees or scrapping a polluting factory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, emissions trading is not that &#8220;untried&#8221;. It has been effective in the US in reducing acid rain under the Sulfur dioxide trading system started in 1990. The program has cut acid rain by about 50% and the Great Lakes are recovering as a result. Like carbon trading, it allows a slower moving company to buy emission credits from a faster moving competitor or share in the savings of new lower-emission facilities. It is estimated that the cost of the 50% savings was 80% lower than a simple per-plant emission standard. In the case of carbon trading, it allows a polluter to buy credits from an accredited pollution saving program, such as sparing a primary forest, planting new trees or scrapping a polluting factory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

