An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right

Eastern Europe is Broke

Eastern Europe map

You think it’s bad here in the US of A?

Take a look at our friends across the pond – and across France and Germany – where you get to those great “emerging markets” that captured the world’s imagination after the fall of Communism. From about 1995 to the early 2000s, the story of growth in places like Poland, Hungary, Czech Republic and the Baltic nations was nothing short of astonishing. Many of these nations were even able to join the elite European Union and share in the great common market.

Oh, the good old days.

Well, they’re done. Kaput.

And now European leaders are asking the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to bail out the nations of Eastern Europe for a cool sum of $500 billion. This isn’t to bail out Eastern European banks. It’s to bail out Eastern European NATIONS.

In many ways the crisis in Eastern Europe mirrors ours: too much debt and speculative growth in real estate and retail, especially in Latvia and Estonia. Look at the debt ratios of some of these countries. They make the Asian crisis in 1997 look like child’s play.

Eastern European debt

Added to this was the complex problem of currency exchange, where millions of Poles and Hungarians and Czechs were encouraged to convert their debt into Swiss francs – low interest rates enticed borrowers to eschew the zloty and the forint for the stable Swiss currency. But, like resetting adjustable rate mortgages in the US, the Swiss-based mortgage rates have gone up, as have defaults in Poland. What’s worse, the Swiss franc is actually in danger of collapse as a result of Switzerland’s investments in Eastern Europe.

It’s as if Eastern Europe was a giant sub-prime market, and the resulting carnage is taking out the venerable banks of Western Europe.

So, yeah, we’ve got it bad here. But things are actually quite a bit worse in Europe, where they have to contend with multiple governmental positions (the ECB can only dictate continental policy so much without pushback from individual creditor nations). And the Euro, the pride and joy of the new European economy, will likely face devaluation vis-a-vis the dollar. (Which is a reason why concerns over a devaluing dollar at this point are unfounded – what would the dollar devalue in relation to?)

Anyway, that’s the news from Europe. Over here we’ll see how the rumored preferred stock-to-common stock conversion plan at Citi goes down tomorrow.



opinions powered by SendLove.to

7 Responses to “Eastern Europe is Broke”

  1. greenschemes says:

    We are seeing the decline and fall of the second Roman empire.

    When Romes economy was expanding she was strong. When it stopped. When she met with obstruction and had to force her way forward then the begin of decline was inevitable. The cities would hand out food to the poor. As they handed out more and more food, more and more -poor showed up at the cities wanting food and less and less people worked to produce. AS the pace of expansion slowed and new trade was not brought forth to the kingdom then the amount of food handed out became an burden on the Roman empire.

    The basic tenet of society is productivity. The USA bases its model on economic expansion to keep people working, productive and happy. So too does every other nation that wishes to even remotely resemble the first or second Roman Empire. And so when the USA was founded it was an absolute certain that it would fail. Not in the short run or even the long run but when the economic expansion was halted and all the lands to conquer were conquered and as Alexander wept for having no more worlds to conquer, so too does the USA have no more lands to expand too.

    Economic expansion has peaked and there is only one way down. The last 12 years has been nothing more then smoking mirrors and unless we replace the smoke and mirrors with something tangible then the decline of this nation will be precipitous.

  2. mikkel says:

    “Which is a reason why concerns over a devaluing dollar at this point are unfounded – what would the dollar devalue in relation to?”

    Stuff.

    I talked about some scenarios back in the fall.

    In the first scenario, the United States will be the main industrialized country experiencing inflation. This could happen if we spend trillions of dollars to help our financial system and the rest of the world sits back. In this cash, the dollar would plummet against other currencies and it makes sense to diversify out of the dollar and use other currencies as a hedge to protect your capital.

    The price of food, gas and other necessities may skyrocket in dollars, but shouldn’t be affected much in other currencies and so monthly bills would be easier to pay off if you have some foreign currency holdings.

    In the second scenario there is global inflation. Right now it seems that Europe and Asia are in deep denial about the extent of their problems. They blame us for the current crisis and seem to think that we are isolated, but by many measures Europe is far worse. They have even more personal debt and a greater bubble than we do and have injected a far greater amount to keep the financial system from collapsing when seen as a percentage of GDP.

    In fact, there are several banks that have more assets than their host country’s GDP. Likewise, Asia in general and China in particular have seen massive cash flows into the region due to artificial devaluation of their local currency. This means that they have many dollar denominated assets and a huge amount of liquidity that is contributing to inflation. China’s inflation is currently running over 10%, as are most of the emerging countries that were such poster children for globalization. These countries do not have a good financial infrastructure and seem to be experiencing many of the problems that plague countries that grow too quickly.

    This scenario (which I think is most realistic on our current path) is the hardest to navigate.

    It doesn’t make sense to try and seek haven in foreign currencies, because that will not protect against price increases. Furthermore, while assets may start to rise like the stock market and housing, the mad rush of the entire world attempting to find assets that return better than their local inflation will make it very difficult to navigate. Under the first scenario it is assumed that a lot of foreigners would stay local but under this one that is no longer logical. I think there is a good chance of random bubbles appearing out of nowhere only to rapidly deflate as people jump out again.

    Commodities like oil, food and metals would see consistent price gains, especially gold. Gold and oil may even form a super bubble as they would be seen as physical assets that are hedges in case fiat currency collapses. If we start to see immense increases in these products without an accompanying decrease in the dollar against other currencies, then I would think about diversifying into those asset classes. Even then I would be loathe to say “recommend” because they will be highly volatile.

    In sort the dollar may rise (or at least hold steady) against other currencies but eventually start falling against real goods. This is what happened in the second stage of the Depression, after the massive deflation and writeoffs occurred.

    I discussed the relationship to production and real value in the second post of that series.

  3. mikkel says:

    Are there two people commenting under your name? On my post about the financial system you accused me of fear mongering, and now you're talking about the collapse of the American Empire and precipitous decline. I actually think if we clean up our financial system and take our hits, our power will grow.

  4. greenschemes says:

    unless we replace the smoke and mirrors with something tangible then the decline of this nation will be precipitous.

    I too actually believe that we have an opportunity to delay the inevitable. But we must replace the smoke and the mirrors with something tangible and something that produces real wages and real services and that is long term. The democrats have always had the platform they are just so damn distracted by other things that they cant keep up with all their stuff they want to do.

    Green.

    Additonally Mikkel…..you overlook one thing that will keep the dollar inflated. These foreign countries are mostly exporters. They live by exports. To export to foreign nations in times of economic stress will force them to devalue their monetary unit. Additionally I will agree that spending all this money is pointless. We are doing nothing more then throwing money at the problem without a plan and without fixing anything. We are just putting off tomorrow what needs to be fixed today.

    My daughter used to call me to borrow a couple hundred dollars to help her pay her bills for this month. I lent it too her a couple months in a row and then it dawned on me. They are 200 bucks short this month paying their bills because their bills are 200 dollars a month more then they make. That means next month they will be 200 bucks short and the month after that unless the underlying dynamics of the problem is addressed.

    In other words pay off 200 dollars worth of bills to balance the budget or increase your income by means other then borrowing.

    For the USA its just easier to borrow then face the political consequences of balancing the budget.

    As to our economy if we wish to go forward, to continue to be productive then we have to look to creative ways to do that. Energy is free. No one has to produce the suns solar rays or the winds power or the power of the tides or the strength of the geothermal wells. Tapping this free energy will provide millions of jobs going forward. Long term jobs that will replace those that are lost as companies that make dinosuars come to grips with reality…………Big 3 for example.

  5. TheMaineView says:

    I agree. If we can ride this out and keep from panicking the US and the world will emerge stronger than ever. Now we know what wont work, what we need to do differently, and hopefully have a greater understanding of the effects of globalization.

    The weak will sink and the cream will rise to the top

  6. mikkel says:

    “They live by exports. To export to foreign nations in times of economic stress will force them to devalue their monetary unit.”

    This is why creditors do worse in depressions than debtors. It was true for the Great Depression and it'll be true now. Still, the debtor countries had depressions back then, just not as bad as the US. You should read the post I linked to at the end.

    Even during the height of the Great Depression, 75% of people kept their jobs, and those that did had an OK time surviving and even started putting themselves in a position to see great increases in standard of living as they eschewed non-essentials and saved money. The real tragedy came from the other 25%.

    I believe that much of the great suffering during the Great Depression came from a combination of government incompetence and freak natural occurrences like the Dust Bowl. We have the ability to create far more food than is needed to feed our populace (perhaps enough to feed most the world) and of course more houses than we know what to do with. For a much smaller cost than trying to inflate the problem away, the government could increase programs to distribute food to those that need it, and procure shelter (paying below historical norms) that could be rented to those that have jobs. It would really be inexcusable if many people would suffer on a fundamental level and we would need to maintain vigilance both towards the government and our own habits to ensure this doesn’t happen.

    Once most of the bad debt was wiped out of the system, the government could then undertake massive public projects to fix our crumbling physical and digital infrastructure and develop alternative energy. These improvements would lay the groundwork for a revitalization of our national economy by enabling massive and sustainable productivity gains. It would lead to new industries and businesses that operate more efficiently (and hopefully morally and intelligently, haha) than the current climate.

    The people that would be most affected over the long term are those that do not have time to share in the revitalization before they are out of the workforce. Anyone over 55 would probably be worse off if we went this route than the first [the first was to inflate massively] – assuming the first was actually successful, which is debatable whether it would be. Many people’s plans for retirement would be completely destroyed, as most of their life’s assets would be gone. If we went down this path, it would fall onto the younger generation to make some sacrifices to support their elders, whom made very large sacrifices for the chance for future generations to have a higher standard of living.

    However, as the United States is still a major power, and uh, I guess the fundamentals of our economy are strong in the way that McCain tried to reposition himself, there is a good chance that the rest of the world would start having their faith renewed in our country. This, combined with increased productivity, would decrease the amount of inflation and make our long term commitments to Social Security and Medicare be OK. As long as our government started being responsible once the next depression was over, and stopped with the hundreds of billions in farm subsidies, bridges to nowhere, wars, etc. there is a very real chance that our balance sheet would look better than it does now.

  7. greenschemes says:

    Even during the height of the Great Depression, 75% of people kept their jobs, and those that did had an OK time surviving and even started putting themselves in a position to see great increases in standard of living as they eschewed non-essentials and saved money. The real tragedy came from the other 25%.

    Which is why I have advocated strengthening our unemployment by both extending its length and increasing the amount. The rest of what they are doing is nothing but feel good, worthless junk thrown around to all the differing factions that have a hand in the pie.

© 2003-2011 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Mode Equity