An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Vexing Questions Raised By Daschle’s HHS Crash And Burn

Former Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle’s announcement that he was withdrawing his name to be to be President Barack Obama’s Health and Human Services secretary amid growing controversy over past tax problems raises several vexing questions:

1. He’s a political pro: was he dense? How could someone who had been Majority Leader, demonized by Republican activists and talk radio when he had that post, targeted and defeated by Republicans, and experienced in the ways of not just Washington but the new and old media get himself in that situation? Did he think it wouldn’t come out? Or that he could smooth it over?

2. Would President Barack Obama have been well served by Daschle if he had gotten the post and become the health care czar? If he had either forgotten about it, underestimated it, or felt he had the political savvy to smooth it over, just think about how he would have fared when he took up health care and ran into Congressional and lobbying opposition to whatever Obama proposed? He was naive, politically unskilled, had a political tin ear, overconfident — or any mixture of all of them.

3. Exactly who has been placed in charge of the Obama vetting process? The manager of a Swiss cheese company? Will there be other examples of sloppy vetting that poorly serves a new President who needs to use the clout he got from the election and his high poll numbers to get through an agenda that is already meeting stiff partisan opposition?

All of the above are raised by today’s events, as reported by the AP:

Tom Daschle withdrew his nomination on Tuesday to be President Barack Obama’s Health and Human Services secretary, faced with problems over back taxes and potential conflicts of interest.

“Now we must move forward,” Obama said in a written statement accepting Daschle’s request to be taken out of consideration. A day earlier, Obama had said he “absolutely” stood by Daschle.

Daschle, the former Senate Democratic leader, said he would have not been able to operate “with the full faith of Congress and the American people.”

“I am not that leader, and will not be a distraction” to Obama’s agenda, he said.

His stunning statement came less than three hours after another Obama nominee also withdrew from consideration, and also over tax problems. Nancy Killefer, nominated by Obama to be the government’s first chief performance officer, said she didn’t want her bungling of payroll taxes on her household help to be a distraction.

Obama, Vice President Joe Biden and Daschle’s former Democratic colleagues had rallied to his defense in the wake of questions about a series of tax issues. Last month, Daschle paid $128,203 in back taxes and $11,964 in interest.

“Tom made a mistake, which he has openly acknowledged,” Obama said. “He has not excused it, nor do I. But that mistake and this decision cannot diminish the many contributions Tom has made to this country.”

But that isn’t the issue…or rather the issues.

Re-read 1, 2, and 3 again.

  • Rambie
    Maybe we should audit everyone in Congress. I'm not trying to be snarky or partisan
  • DLS
    1. You would think that the Obama inner circle would have learned from the case of Dan Quayle, George W. Bush (admittedly, the GOP was desperate in running a dynastic "brand name label" candidate in 2000; everyone expected Gore to win), and Sarah Palin, even. But no. What was the real extent of the reportedly extensive, thorough background check process for prospective new Obama administration members? Ordinary people wanting a job had to apparently even report if they own or ever have owned a gun (politically incorrect!). But tax evasion? Where are the priorities? Or did Clintonites get something of a pass so Obama could bring aboard trusted (to Washington) insiders?

    2. All these people live too well and should be audited. Expect to see a lot more tax evasion if that ever were to happen.

    3. What do we see next in a revised stimulus, an Obama "tax credit" for domestic help, and waivers on documentation for foreigners?

    4. Does this imply that Obama might also reconsider his waiver on his ban on lobbyists, when bringing lobbyists into his adminstration has been desired?
  • mikeyes
    I was not a fan of Daschle in the first place, but there are only two explanations for his not paying a huge tax bill: either he was crooked or he was incompetent. A $100,000+ tax difference is not an error, even if your income exceeds $5M, it is something else.

    This was a bad choice by Obama and it is a good thing that it did not come to pass. Daschle did not lobby for insurance companies or big medicine, but his wife did. How often did he accompany her to various events? Why was he paid gazillions to be a K street "consultant" if his position didn't add value to their efforts? He was for all practical purposes a lobbyist even if he didn't meet the legal definition of one.

    Bad Choice.
  • CStanley
    Maybe we should audit everyone in Congress.

    It would give a new meaning to "Paygo". You pay up what you owe, or you go.
  • JSpencer
    I see this as unfortunate, but was against the Daschle pick from the moment his tax records came out. It's unfortunate because I believe he had the ability to do the job well, but as Joe points out, it raises the obvious questions about the vetting process. The HHS sec position is a critical one, now more than ever I believe, so the replacement choice will need to be a humdinger..
  • Miande
    There is a third possibility: that Obama was aware of the tax problems of three of his nominees but thought he somehow could bull them through. His arrogance serves him well at times, but this might the case where it did him in. If so, it was foolish on everyone's part.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC