
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Caroline Kennedy, Kirsten Gillibrand, and the Ridiculous Senate Seat Drama in New York</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/25893/caroline-kennedy-kirsten-gillibrand-and-the-ridiculous-senate-seat-drama-in-new-york/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/25893/caroline-kennedy-kirsten-gillibrand-and-the-ridiculous-senate-seat-drama-in-new-york/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 16:39:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikeyes</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/25893/caroline-kennedy-kirsten-gillibrand-and-the-ridiculous-senate-seat-drama-in-new-york/comment-page-1/#comment-170010</link>
		<dc:creator>mikeyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 16:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/25893/caroline-kennedy-kirsten-gillibrand-and-the-ridiculous-senate-seat-drama-in-new-york/#comment-170010</guid>
		<description>So, Party first and then Country?  It seems that this is the same complaint that the left has with the Republicans - and I happen to agree that putting party first is wrong in these times.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Perhaps she has other qualities that will make her a good senator that Gov. Patterson (surely not a rightwingnut) sees and you don&#039;t.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The gun thing is a moot point, I don&#039;t agree with her take on gay marriage, but her view (against) happens to coincide with the President&#039;s stated one while being a member of a politically active family is not exactly rare in the Senate and probably an asset.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If she is not a good choice, we will find out in a few years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, Party first and then Country?  It seems that this is the same complaint that the left has with the Republicans &#8211; and I happen to agree that putting party first is wrong in these times.</p>
<p>Perhaps she has other qualities that will make her a good senator that Gov. Patterson (surely not a rightwingnut) sees and you don&#39;t.</p>
<p>The gun thing is a moot point, I don&#39;t agree with her take on gay marriage, but her view (against) happens to coincide with the President&#39;s stated one while being a member of a politically active family is not exactly rare in the Senate and probably an asset.</p>
<p>If she is not a good choice, we will find out in a few years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GeorgeSorwell</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/25893/caroline-kennedy-kirsten-gillibrand-and-the-ridiculous-senate-seat-drama-in-new-york/comment-page-1/#comment-170003</link>
		<dc:creator>GeorgeSorwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 16:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/25893/caroline-kennedy-kirsten-gillibrand-and-the-ridiculous-senate-seat-drama-in-new-york/#comment-170003</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Paterson has proven himself to be a weak and ineffectual figure, unable to take charge of the situation. Seriously, all he had to do was pick someone, a Democrat to replace a Democrat in an overwhelmingly Democratic state. So why the “confusing and even embarrassing two-month ordeal”? What’s the problem? &lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh, come on. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s one thing to dislike the supposed replacement for her politics. But this complaint is kind of silly. Maybe your longing for the good-old-days of Eliot Spitzer should have tipped you to that. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree that this drama is ridiculous. But the name Caroline Kennedy sells advertising space. This ridiculous drama is just another example of our dumb media feathering its own bed. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don&#039;t think Patterson can fairly be blamed because a world famous person announced she wanted the job. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In fact, I think it should be acknowleged that Patterson was somewhat wise in waiting to see if she might self-destruct as a viable candidate, considering her lack of experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Paterson has proven himself to be a weak and ineffectual figure, unable to take charge of the situation. Seriously, all he had to do was pick someone, a Democrat to replace a Democrat in an overwhelmingly Democratic state. So why the “confusing and even embarrassing two-month ordeal”? What’s the problem? </p></blockquote>
<p>Oh, come on. </p>
<p>It&#39;s one thing to dislike the supposed replacement for her politics. But this complaint is kind of silly. Maybe your longing for the good-old-days of Eliot Spitzer should have tipped you to that. </p>
<p>I agree that this drama is ridiculous. But the name Caroline Kennedy sells advertising space. This ridiculous drama is just another example of our dumb media feathering its own bed. </p>
<p>I don&#39;t think Patterson can fairly be blamed because a world famous person announced she wanted the job. </p>
<p>In fact, I think it should be acknowleged that Patterson was somewhat wise in waiting to see if she might self-destruct as a viable candidate, considering her lack of experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

