<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Returning to the Silly Season</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/25824/returning-to-the-silly-season/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/25824/returning-to-the-silly-season/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 04:43:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Merritt</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/25824/returning-to-the-silly-season/comment-page-1/#comment-169834</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Merritt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 07:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/25824/returning-to-the-silly-season/#comment-169834</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not a vegan or vegetarian, but I want to remind you that while PETA may = vegan, that doesn&#039;t mean vegan = PETA.  :P  I know several vegans and vegetarians that I assure you are not of the PETA type.  One I&#039;m pretty certain is some shade of libertarian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m not a vegan or vegetarian, but I want to remind you that while PETA may = vegan, that doesn&#39;t mean vegan = PETA.  <img src='http://themoderatevoice.com/wordpress-engine/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' />   I know several vegans and vegetarians that I assure you are not of the PETA type.  One I&#39;m pretty certain is some shade of libertarian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silhouette</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/25824/returning-to-the-silly-season/comment-page-1/#comment-169818</link>
		<dc:creator>Silhouette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 01:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/25824/returning-to-the-silly-season/#comment-169818</guid>
		<description>dark-skinned people look good in all manner of bright and unique colors.  I think it was a fine color for January, the cold.  It grew on me too.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And I could care less what marks she got or what B. Walters said about fashion reflecting an administration.  WTF?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dark-skinned people look good in all manner of bright and unique colors.  I think it was a fine color for January, the cold.  It grew on me too.</p>
<p>And I could care less what marks she got or what B. Walters said about fashion reflecting an administration.  WTF?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CStanley</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/25824/returning-to-the-silly-season/comment-page-1/#comment-169793</link>
		<dc:creator>CStanley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 22:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/25824/returning-to-the-silly-season/#comment-169793</guid>
		<description>I liked the outfit too (the one for the inaugural ceremony- her ball gown was pretty but not flattering to her, which is odd because she generally has a great physique for clothes.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And in Amanda Hall&#039;s defense, there have been tons of gushing articles on Michelle&#039;s fashion sense ever since Obama took the lead during campaign season, so it&#039;s not as though she suddenly decided to bring this up out of the blue to write something b*tchy .&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Plus, she&#039;s right about the sports analogy. I recall early in the Bush adminstration seeing Condi Rice several times greeting female heads of state and I&#039;d have sworn they were complimenting each other&#039;s outfits. It seemed a bit odd at first, but I&#039;m sure that the male equivalent of small talk goes on during those meet and greets all the time as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked the outfit too (the one for the inaugural ceremony- her ball gown was pretty but not flattering to her, which is odd because she generally has a great physique for clothes.)</p>
<p>And in Amanda Hall&#39;s defense, there have been tons of gushing articles on Michelle&#39;s fashion sense ever since Obama took the lead during campaign season, so it&#39;s not as though she suddenly decided to bring this up out of the blue to write something b*tchy .</p>
<p>Plus, she&#39;s right about the sports analogy. I recall early in the Bush adminstration seeing Condi Rice several times greeting female heads of state and I&#39;d have sworn they were complimenting each other&#39;s outfits. It seemed a bit odd at first, but I&#39;m sure that the male equivalent of small talk goes on during those meet and greets all the time as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roro80</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/25824/returning-to-the-silly-season/comment-page-1/#comment-169775</link>
		<dc:creator>roro80</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 19:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/25824/returning-to-the-silly-season/#comment-169775</guid>
		<description>I liked the outfit, personally.  Not what I would have chosen, to be sure, but as the ceremony went on, it grew on me.  The fabric was gorgeous, and the cut worked well for her.  The gloves weren&#039;t great, but eh, whatever.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don&#039;t personally mind the football/fashion comparison.  Fashion is something that a small group of women are fully fanatic about, some really couldn&#039;t care less, but most women have at least a passing interest in the subject, enough to have an opinion. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As to comparing the praise/criticism of the first lady&#039;s dress to slave buttocks, I&#039;d say that&#039;s pretty insulting, all around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked the outfit, personally.  Not what I would have chosen, to be sure, but as the ceremony went on, it grew on me.  The fabric was gorgeous, and the cut worked well for her.  The gloves weren&#39;t great, but eh, whatever.  </p>
<p>I don&#39;t personally mind the football/fashion comparison.  Fashion is something that a small group of women are fully fanatic about, some really couldn&#39;t care less, but most women have at least a passing interest in the subject, enough to have an opinion. </p>
<p>As to comparing the praise/criticism of the first lady&#39;s dress to slave buttocks, I&#39;d say that&#39;s pretty insulting, all around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marlowecan</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/25824/returning-to-the-silly-season/comment-page-1/#comment-169754</link>
		<dc:creator>Marlowecan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/25824/returning-to-the-silly-season/#comment-169754</guid>
		<description>Hahaha...Sil, it is a matter of aesthetics I think, more than sex-objectifying.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It may just be socialization...but most straight women I know are lightning swift in their visual analyses of clothing and styles...most straight men I know are pretty thick.&lt;br&gt;(Gay men and lesbians of my acquaintance fit into both camps...so who knows from gender?)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I find that having female accompaniment when shopping for clothes saves immense time and anxiety.&lt;br&gt;&quot;Yes&quot; or &quot;No&quot; are declared definitively and reassuringly. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In re: your comment about &quot;what progress we&#039;ve made as a nation&quot;  perhaps Barbara Walters&#039;s comment - in Jazz&#039;s link - is enlightening:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Barbara Walters, who said on The View, the other day, &quot;I think you can tell what the Administration is going to be like by what the First Lady wears.&quot; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I thought this was utterly absurd when I read it, but I have since been put in my place:  Mamie Eisenhower&#039;s hideously conservative confections...Jackie Kennedy&#039;s style...Nancy Reagan&#039;s &quot;Dynasty&quot; gowns...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Could it be true? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Unlike Jazz....I hope to live past the Superbowl...so will say nada more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hahaha&#8230;Sil, it is a matter of aesthetics I think, more than sex-objectifying.</p>
<p>It may just be socialization&#8230;but most straight women I know are lightning swift in their visual analyses of clothing and styles&#8230;most straight men I know are pretty thick.<br />(Gay men and lesbians of my acquaintance fit into both camps&#8230;so who knows from gender?)</p>
<p>I find that having female accompaniment when shopping for clothes saves immense time and anxiety.<br />&#8220;Yes&#8221; or &#8220;No&#8221; are declared definitively and reassuringly. </p>
<p>In re: your comment about &#8220;what progress we&#39;ve made as a nation&#8221;  perhaps Barbara Walters&#39;s comment &#8211; in Jazz&#39;s link &#8211; is enlightening:</p>
<p>&#8220;Barbara Walters, who said on The View, the other day, &#8220;I think you can tell what the Administration is going to be like by what the First Lady wears.&#8221; </p>
<p>I thought this was utterly absurd when I read it, but I have since been put in my place:  Mamie Eisenhower&#39;s hideously conservative confections&#8230;Jackie Kennedy&#39;s style&#8230;Nancy Reagan&#39;s &#8220;Dynasty&#8221; gowns&#8230;</p>
<p>Could it be true? </p>
<p>Unlike Jazz&#8230;.I hope to live past the Superbowl&#8230;so will say nada more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silhouette</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/25824/returning-to-the-silly-season/comment-page-1/#comment-169753</link>
		<dc:creator>Silhouette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/25824/returning-to-the-silly-season/#comment-169753</guid>
		<description>Wow, &quot;giving marks&quot; for women based on how they&#039;re dressed...for sex-objectifying&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I hear they used to be into &quot;giving marks&quot; for black slaves based on how big the muscles of their buttocks were...for work potential...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh my yes, what progress we&#039;ve made as a nation..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, &#8220;giving marks&#8221; for women based on how they&#39;re dressed&#8230;for sex-objectifying</p>
<p>I hear they used to be into &#8220;giving marks&#8221; for black slaves based on how big the muscles of their buttocks were&#8230;for work potential&#8230;</p>
<p>Oh my yes, what progress we&#39;ve made as a nation..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marlowecan</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/25824/returning-to-the-silly-season/comment-page-1/#comment-169747</link>
		<dc:creator>Marlowecan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/25824/returning-to-the-silly-season/#comment-169747</guid>
		<description>An unbelievable post by Jazz . . . praising Football at the expense of Fashion. . . revealing a hitherto undiscovered Death Wish on his part.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We can safely anticipate there won&#039;t be any posts from Jazz past the Superbowl.  &lt;br&gt;Will it be arsenic-laced chicken wings, or perhaps pizza?  No, it will probably be in the beer...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The first comment I heard about the whole extravaganza was when the First Ladies stepped out of the limousine.&lt;br&gt;&quot;Well, that&#039;s unfortunate.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Laura Bush got better marks.  I was surprised about that.  &lt;br&gt;I was informed what is apparently common knowledge about Tipper Gore aiding Hilary Clinton in dumping her wardrobe errors before entering the White House. &lt;br&gt;Presumably someone will have a talk with Michelle Obama. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I was very impressed with the ceremony yesterday (with the notable exception of the bloviating Warren)...and particularly with how Obama dealt with the Chief Justice&#039;s flub.  &lt;br&gt;There was no sense that Obama was visibly annoyed with having his moment marred.  One could see Obama&#039;s moment of realization that Roberts had the line wrong, and then he smiled and went along.&lt;br&gt;Class.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In contrast, the hecklers were classless. &lt;br&gt; Not unexpected, though.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bush&#039;s inauguration in 2005 was marked, for me, by the British Guardian newspaper asking: &quot;Where is John Wilkes Booth or Harvey Oswald when you need them?&quot; &lt;br&gt;As he was welcomed by his opponent&#039;s, after winning a democratic election, with such grace and class . . . I suppose Bush should feel lucky his opponents only heckled his departure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An unbelievable post by Jazz . . . praising Football at the expense of Fashion. . . revealing a hitherto undiscovered Death Wish on his part.</p>
<p>We can safely anticipate there won&#39;t be any posts from Jazz past the Superbowl.  <br />Will it be arsenic-laced chicken wings, or perhaps pizza?  No, it will probably be in the beer&#8230;</p>
<p>The first comment I heard about the whole extravaganza was when the First Ladies stepped out of the limousine.<br />&#8220;Well, that&#39;s unfortunate.&#8221;</p>
<p>Laura Bush got better marks.  I was surprised about that.  <br />I was informed what is apparently common knowledge about Tipper Gore aiding Hilary Clinton in dumping her wardrobe errors before entering the White House. <br />Presumably someone will have a talk with Michelle Obama. </p>
<p>I was very impressed with the ceremony yesterday (with the notable exception of the bloviating Warren)&#8230;and particularly with how Obama dealt with the Chief Justice&#39;s flub.  <br />There was no sense that Obama was visibly annoyed with having his moment marred.  One could see Obama&#39;s moment of realization that Roberts had the line wrong, and then he smiled and went along.<br />Class.</p>
<p>In contrast, the hecklers were classless. <br /> Not unexpected, though.</p>
<p>Bush&#39;s inauguration in 2005 was marked, for me, by the British Guardian newspaper asking: &#8220;Where is John Wilkes Booth or Harvey Oswald when you need them?&#8221; <br />As he was welcomed by his opponent&#39;s, after winning a democratic election, with such grace and class . . . I suppose Bush should feel lucky his opponents only heckled his departure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buck Naked Politics</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/25824/returning-to-the-silly-season/comment-page-1/#comment-169752</link>
		<dc:creator>Buck Naked Politics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/25824/returning-to-the-silly-season/#comment-169752</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Inauguration Day Joys and Woes&lt;/strong&gt;

by Damozel &#124; It was a joyous occasion for me. After reading at FDL Gregg Levine&#039;s bitter portrayal of his experiences at the real site (which, rather solipsitically, he seems to read as a reflection on the incoming administration), I&#039;m glad I watched...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Inauguration Day Joys and Woes</strong></p>
<p>by Damozel | It was a joyous occasion for me. After reading at FDL Gregg Levine&#8217;s bitter portrayal of his experiences at the real site (which, rather solipsitically, he seems to read as a reflection on the incoming administration), I&#8217;m glad I watched&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

