An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

California Budget

I had been planning to write a couple of columns, one on the issues of the federal budget and one on the budget here in California. Since Governor Arnold will be giving his State of the State address this morning it seemed to make sense to do California today. I will be reworking a prior post on the subject and would welcome comments.

However I would like to make a request. While I obviously cannot control what you will and will not post, I’d rather not have this (or the Federal budget feature tomorrow) be a blame game thing. We can argue back and forth over who is to blame but the fact is we are where we are and need to focus on solving the issues rather than tossing blame.

Right now in California we are facing a budget crisis of epic proportions. It looks like right now we will have revenues of around $ 100 billion and spending of around $ 145 billion. This is a deficit of $ 45 billion or around 1/3 of the total budget.

 The result of such a crisis should be for members of both parties to come together to solve the problems but instead things have focused on the traditional rhetoric from both sides so I thought I would offer a bit of a reality check for the legislators.

Reality Check #1: Revenue

The first reality check is you are going to have to increase revenue. Whether this is through cutting out loopholes, increasing overall rates, increasing other fees or a combination of the three is certainly open for discussion, but you are not going to cut 20% or more from spending to close this kind of a gap.

So for the GOP, the reality check here is you have to accept that increases are needed, get used to it and try to find the least damaging way to make these increases. Do not simply oppose tax increases because you don’t like them, don’t get stubborn and ignore the fact that if you do not fix this the economy is going to be in even more serious trouble (if that is possible).

For the Democrats, the reality check is that this is NOT an opening to ’soak the rich’ and punish people for succeeding. It is a necessary step because of the financial mess but you should only make those increases that are required to close part of the gap. Some of these increases will be temporary and you should not grumble down the road about ‘cuts for the rich.

Reality Check #2: Spending

The next reality check is you are also going to have to cut spending. As with revenues this can be accomplished through a combination of factors like cutting waste, reducing the less important programs and the like. But in the end you are going to have to cut some spending that is going to cause some pain.

For the Democrats, the reality here is you have to accept that some hard choices will need to be made. I know education is important but we may just have to accept some cuts in areas we’d rather not cut. If you’re going to hike taxes, you also need to cut spending. It’s a 50/50 proposition and the burden has to be passed around (of course we might not necessarily split the spending and revenue changes on a dollar for dollar basis, but you get the point)

For the Republicans, the reality check is that you have to behave here like the Democrats need to behave on taxes. This is NOT an opportunity for you to cut every social program you don’t like. This is NOT an opportunity for you to pare government to the Libertarian ideal. And when some of these programs get increases down the road, you need to live with that.

Now just to put our current budget situation in perspective

Just for reference, the US budget did not reach these levels of spending and income until the mid 1960’s and at that point spending $ 100,000,000,000 was seen as a major problem. The budget in California that year was around $ 5 billion (or roughly $ 35-$ 45 billion in current dollars, depending on which conversion process you use).

Those numbers are worth noting given that at the time we had the best schools in the nation, the best roads in the country, etc.

There are of course many reasons for the increased costs and spending, though given that they have doubled with reduced returns it does beg the question of what happpened. I think one of the issues that also needs to be addressed is Reality Check #3.

Reality Check #3: Immigration

For both parties the final reality check is you need to address the 10,000 pound gorilla in the room which is illegal immigration (or undocumented workers if you prefer). Now, I am a huge fan of immigration. This is what made our country great and what will continue to help us grow in the future.

But there is a difference between those who go through the system and those who do not go through the system. I know that people like to say these immigrants perform duties that others will not but I am not so sure that is true. But either way the fact is that these immigrants are a large part of the budget problem facing many states.

When you don’t have documentation, you don’t get a paycheck, you get paid in cash. As a rule you don’t pay state or local income taxes and in many cases you don’t pay licensing fees for cars, etc since you can’t go in to apply for these programs without being legal. Yes, you do pay sales taxes, but you don’t contribute to the general budgets

At the same time you do take advantage of the programs paid for by the other taxpayers like schools, roads, public hospitals, etc When you’ve got 50 people paying in to a system and 75 people taking out of the system, the problem is pretty obvious.

As with spending and revenue, the solution here is not entirely obvious. While some groups would like to ’send them all back home’ I am not sure that this is entirely workable. Perhaps some of them should be sent back, others should be brought into the system. But either way you need to find a way to resolve this imbalance

For both sides you need to work through this problem without all of the rhetoric. The Left needs to accept that some of these people will need to be sent home and it’s not racism. Legal immigrants of all races are welcome to stay, but at least some illegal immigrants of all races need to go home.

The Right on the other hand needs to accept that sending everyone home just is not realistic as a solution. Some of these people have been here for years and just need a way to get into the legal system. It’s all a matter of balance.

  • superdestroyer
    California is probably a victim of the ratchet effect. When boom times happen (dot.com bubble, real estate bubble) the state and local government find new ways to spend money. Then the bad times eventually show up and the state runs huge deficits.

    Also, California has voters approving new spending initiatives that leave the fund raising to the state such as stem cell.
  • Silhouette
    You know, I hear that a lot these days. "Let's look forward...let's not play the blame game."

    The thing is that the beauty of the blame game isn't that people are getting off on trashing other people, it's that we can get to the bottom of why we're in the mess we're in and take proactive steps to prevent the same thing happening in the future.

    Without doing that we are not an evolved species. We learn from our mistakes. If we simply blind ourselves to the mistakes, we will not learn and will repeat history over and over until our stubborn eyes open up.

    Rule of thumb: anyone who seems overly interested in not playing the blame game is the first place to start. ; )
  • DLS
    Silhouette as well as Superdestroyer happen to be right. First we have to identify the problems, and their causes. (Incrementalism or the "ratchet" that Superdestroyer refers to is accurate, though it's not as bad as when New York City bankrupted itself through the motto "More" over several years leading to failure in the mid-1970s.) Overall, it's excessive spending that's to blame, on unnecessary things (wants becoming "needs" [sic]). With the stock bubble, which was Internet-related, and then the real-estate bubble, California's contemporary buy-a-vote gang spent to all new heights. California is notoriously bad, but has a different "flavor" or complexion vis-a-vis the Northeast and industrial Midwest. There is not as much a dinosaur nature to it and not as many fiefdoms with arrogant bureaucrats whose instinctive reaction to any shortfall is a tax increase. It "came of age" after World War II and has been run forever by Dems in Sacramento, the unions, etc., but is different from as well as much larger than any older eastern Blue state. (Even-more-stupid environmental policies, for example, and reliance on and parasitism of other states for much of its electrical power supply and on Mexico for liquefied natural gas facilities.)

    Now they need to look at what may work best for everyone, as described below for the federal government but which involves the states, too,


    http://budget.senate.gov/democratic/testimony/2...


    but they must set priorities, and reduce or eliminate what is unimportant or unnecessary, which is where California routinely failed before I moved away from there in 1992. Requiring discipline and the setting of priorities, and having to say No, challenges California's maturity. It proved too much for so many in 1975 with New York City (which arrogantly expected the rest of the country to give it the money to keep wasting), has proved too much before elsewhere, and may be too challenging again now. Surely the answer isn't magical assumptions that "green jobs" will be a solution -- as Michigan's governor and New York City's current mayor wrongly profess so embarrassingly.
  • DLS
    Just like with Michigan or New York -- federal bailouts are not the instant solution. No continuing business as usual. And as with Michigan, New York, or any other state that goes broke: federal receivership (takeover), if it _were_ to happen, should come with demotion to territorial status and loss of things like Congressional representation and whatever amounts to standard practices (official or otherwise) of revenue-sharing by Washington. It's Detroit on steroids, without the bailout and the halfway meddling. Just meddling.

    What can Obama and Washington do? I still say do something quick that works toward their goals in Washington, like folding Medicaid into Medicare (expanding the scope of Medicare on its way toward encompassing all citizens and their dependents eventually). Taking over Medicaid ("100% financing at this time") would be a big help to the states while they proceeded to enact their own needed reforms.
  • DLS
    Here. You'll recognize some names in here. Fits in with Moody's Economy.com positions and those names should be familiar to you.

    http://www.cbp.org/pdfs/2008/0807_pp_cutsortaxe...

    Enjoy. Good luck, California, you need it. I don't think you can convert to an objective, truly just property tax system in place of Prop 13, which would be great to do now since so much is in need of reform and revision there. Hopefully someday you'll be exporting electric power rather than having to import it, and have developed Monterey Bay into another national-class metro area rivaling San Diego, but that's expecting too much of you again, at this time. We'll see what you manage to do. Washington should let you fail before taking any action -- if you cannot prevent failure, which you ought to be able to do.
  • Dr J
    Patrick, I agree, taxes must go up and spending must come down.

    However, if this isn't an ideal time for fiscal conservatives to cut every social program they don't like, what is? There seems to be a process for adding programs but none for retiring them. And once added, times eventually get hard, taxes must go up to balance the budget, and the ratchet ticks another notch.

    Companies in this situation find lines of business they can no longer afford to be in, and they shut them down entirely. The state should do the same.

    This is also an ideal time for measures designed to reduce the cost of services. We keep authorizing more money for schools, yet education seems to keep getting more expensive as schools are burdened with costs of complying with government regulations. Likewise government keeps passing measures to make health care incrementally safer or incrementally more philanthropic, and curiously it keeps getting more expensive. With education taking the lion's share of the state budget, this is a perfect time to re-examine the burdens state regulation places on it.
  • Iamnotanumber
    “Let’s not play the game blame” is just a euphemism for tax and spend. First off you cut spending then you see what you need. Are you aware that there are 4 California entities with overlapping responsibilities for energy matters (CEC, PUC, Calif ISO, ARB). There are 4 agencies that manage landfills, and over 6 involved in environmental issues,. There are 4 (count them) 4 state policing entities (CHP, State Police, State Marshals, Capital Police), the list goes on and on. Approval from one agency sometimes leads to intervention by another. My employer is shutting down and moving to Kentucky. If Karen Bass gets her way we will have the highest corporate income tax in the nation, highest personal income tax, and highest sales tax in the nation. Neither I nor my company can afford California any longer. Many have been professing this for decades, but living on credit has become a way of life. Ask yourself this (and be honest) do you interact with the State Government more than once a year (at tax time). What exactly does the state do for you except “regulate” you?
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC