The international news-related quote of the day comes from Michael van der Galien at Poligazette:
I’ve had numerous discussions with people, mostly fellow Muslims, in recent days about the Israeli attacks on Gaza and the civilian victims of these bombings. As these people point out to me, purposefully killing innocent people – especially children – is a major crime against humanity and it is forbidden in the Qur’an: killing children is one of the worst crimes imaginable. As the Qur’an says, ‘he who kills one innocent, it is as if he killed the whole of mankind.’
Since children are the most innocent human beings in the world, killing them is a major sin and crime: both in Islam and according to secular law.
However, one should not only look at whether children are killed or not, one should also consider the intention of the killer: did they mean to kill the child or did they do everything in their power (except for not defending themselves and waiting to be killed themselves) to prevent the deaths?
In the case of Israel and Hamas, the difference between both sides should be clear to everyone with half a brain. Israel tries not to kill innocent people, but sadly some die nonetheless (collateral damage). Hamas, on the other hand, purposefully kills innocent Israelis and the terrorist group purposefully uses children and other innocent individuals as a human shield.
See, for instance, this video:
Go to the link to see the video and read the entire post.
Horse Shit!!!
Lebanon and Israel – Children and Armed Conflict
If you care about children, you do not destroy schools, you do not bomb hospitals and more importantly you do not drop cluster bombs like they were going out of style.
The Qassam rockets have no guidance system. While Hamas does kill a small number of innocent children, these rockets are very inaccurate. However, the GPS and laser guided bombs, many supplied from the US, are accurate to within a few feet, when dropped from 30,000 feet.
Qassam:
JDAM:
GBU:
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/…
http://www.raytheon.com/capabilities/rtnwcm/gro…
Guided munition CEP=3.6ft.
Unguided munition CEP=310ft.
The difference is that Israel attacks “military” targets they do not target civilian populations. If someone is using civilian populations or infrastructure to “hide” military operations then it is they, not the side who strikes at them, who puts civilians at risk. This is a well known and established part of law. Hamas and other organizations actively target civilian populations. There is a difference. You can be sympathetic to Palestinian plight and still aknowlage the truth.
The leadership of Hamas is perfectly willing–perfectly eager, in fact–to get Palestinian civilians killed.
George and EEllis: that is precisely my point. Hamas is purposefully sacrificing civilians, including children, for their 'cause' (this cause, it has to be said, is not just the creation of a Palestinian state under Islamist rule but also the destruction of Israel; it's in their founding covenant). These victims of Hamas are then declared 'martyrs' (shaheed), and their family and relatives are told that they will be praised in heaven, etc.
Schools and mosques are attacked, or may be attacked, because Hamas hides weapons, fighters and ammunition in those buildings. If these buildings are not destroyed, Israelis believe that any action would be rendered useless simply because Hamas would recover from Israeli attacks in a few days time.
Horse Shit!!!
The Israelis don't give a f*ck, if they did they wouldn't use Cluster Bombs after they know they have lost the battle.
Haaretz – IDF commander: We fired more than a million cluster bombs in Lebanon
Cluster bombs: a war's perilous aftermath
A nice litlle F**k You present to the Lebanese, because we can and the Americans will cover our asses at the UN and excuse anything we do.
BBC – Peres 'regrets Gaza bombing mistake'
Obviously the action of a country that is really going out of it's way not to kill innocent bystanders.
Right now in Gaza we have over 300 deaths compared to 4 in Israel. I've always thought bombing in largely civilian areas is a war crime, as is rocket attacks on a largely civilian areas. The bigness of the crime to me depends on the number of civilians killed. The bombing is killing far more civilians indiscriminately, than the rockets are 'on purpose'. Hence Israel is guilty of the larger war crime.
I very much agree with Don Quijote and I haven't forgotten the bombing of Lebanon either.
Yep, the Israelis have major, major problems. They have done some really horrendous things. But DQ and Donnajean seem like such staunch defenders of Hamas that I just have to add this.
I notice that none of those defending Hamas so vociferously care to address the fact that Hamas uses civilians as a shield on purpose. They also will probably not admit that Hamas had to know that continuing those missile launches would result in the Israeli government having to strike back. They purposefully provoked an attack that had to kill civilians. Are you really seriously suggesting that the Israeli government do absolutely nothing while missiles are fired on their citizens? And before you bother saying it…it doesn't matter how inaccurate the Kassam missiles are. Consider this article with some more recent information. The Kassam rocket is not the only weapon Hamas has. They also have missiles made in Iran and China. Since Israel withdrew from the Gaza strip in 2005 there have been 6300 rockets and mortar rounds fired from there into Israel. How would you like to live under that threat.
DQ you forgot to mention that the cluster bomb were fired into areas near Israel were civilian populations are thin (compared to other areas in Lebanon with much greater population densities were if they just wanted civilian casualties they could do better) but raiding parties often travel to enter Israel. Like the one that captured the solders that caused the most recent invasion. I've yet to see anyone say here that Israel is perfect or always right. Ignoring realities just makes you look ignorant and will lead to no one with an ounce of sense believing in your point of view.
“The attack targeted a leading member of the militant group Hamas, Sheikh Salah Shahada, who was among those killed when an F-16 jet dropped a one-tonne guided bomb on the apartment block where he was staying. “
Good example. If they would that bomb in an isolated structure then it is legal and well within international norm to use it if he is hiding in civilian areas. If not them everyone would of course just hide in civilian areas. It's inconceivable that you can give anyone that kind of get out of everything free card. That Israel has a responsibility to care more about civilians in Palestine than Hamas, the govt of Palestine, is absurd. I understand why, I even have sympathy for the Palestinian situation, but get real.
You forgot to mention the reason why the population is thinner in that part of Lebanon than in others. Might the 1982 invasion and occupation of Lebanon have anything to do with it?
<shrugs shoulders>
As far as Israeli supporters in the US goes, Israel can do no wrong, despite 40 years of illegal occupation, land theft, massacres, and various violation of human rights and it's the fault of those dirty filthy disgusting Palestinians.
OTOH if the the Palestinians are good little boys and girls and don't fight back, the little land they have will be stolen from them, they will live under occupation and be non-persons in the land in which their ancestors have lived for hundred of years, if they fight back with whatever weapons they can get their hands on the little land they have will be stolen from them, they will live under occupation and be non-persons in the land in which their ancestors have lived for hundred of years. Damned if they do, damned if they don't.
The irony here is that short of the Israeli going out and committing genocide and killing the four to five million Palestinians living in Greater Israel (Israel, West Bank & Gaza) Israel will not exist as a Jewish 50 years from now. Demographics are a bitch.
Context matters. The people of Gaza live under horrible conditions enforced by the Israeli military. Their brothers and sisters in the West Bank have likewise seen their land stolen and walls built between them and their jobs. Living in either place is a nightmare that few us can likely comprehend.
Under those conditions is it any great surprise that Palestinians have become radicalized? Is it any surprise that they do whatever they can (what we call terrorism) to fight back? It may be counterproductive, it may be immoral, but it's not difficult to understand why it's happening.
Michael is right that intentions matter, but so do capabilities. The Palestinians are incapable of fighting a war with the Israelis on their terms, with soldiers, tanks and guided missiles. They don't have military bases (living in them would be suicide). What they do have is highly ineffective rockets, and people willing to strap bombs to themselves, and children throwing rocks.
Again, what they're doing is violent, and it's wrong, but what do you expect when both their own past leaders and Israeli leaders have done nothing but exacerbate a 60 year occupation? The peace process has given them nothing, and so they lash out rather than simply dying with a whimper. Don't pretend like you would do anything different if you were in their situation.
The way forward is clear, neither Israeli bombs or Hamas's rockets will create peace. But America and Israel can. They can immediately end the blockade of Gaza, they can begin dismantling the illegal outposts across the 1967 green line, and they can let the Palestinians govern themselves and become a country.
And pigs can fly…
Yes, DQ, we understand that you know that the Palestinians and their leaders are the saintly ones in this debacle. As far as this statement, I say prove it.
Once again, prove it. Show us some positive proof that the Israelis could stand up to international pressure and not become a pariah state if the Palestinians actually turned away from terrorism and stayed on the path of peaceful resistance and kept some resolve on the issue. Where is your recognition that it was the Arabs who started the wars that led to land being lost? Somehow I missed that. Yes, the evil Jews of Israel are the only ones at fault and the Palestinians can do no wrong according to what you write. You're just as wrong as any apologists who think that the settlements are a good thing and that the West Bank shouldn't be allowed to become a true home for the Palestinians.
ChrisWWW,
I'm sorry but I couldn't let this one pass.
Sorry, but it is terrorism. Don't give me that “what we call terrorism” crap. Blowing up buses, restaurants, hotels and markets full of civilians and tourists in attacks targeted specifically at civilians is terrorism, plain and simple. There is no equivocation that is acceptable on this. There is no “Oh, it's just what we call it because we don't understand.”. That kind of excuse is just pure crap. It's wrong no matter who does it for what cause.
PBS – Road to the Road Map
While you are sitting in good faith at the negotiating table, you don't double the number of Settlements on Occupied Territories. I am still waiting to hear the outrage from Americans or to see any negative consequences for the Israelis for behaving with such bad faith.
Plan Dalet and The NAKBA
Thanks for setting me straight,
Palestinian: Bad
Fatah: Double Bad
Hamas: Double Double plus Bad
Israel : Good
Jews: Double Good
Israeli Jews: Double Double plus Good
What's to stop the Double Double plus Good people from removing their settlements? Peace Now: West Bank settlement construction nearly doubled this year
But you also missed that the goal of your heroes of Israel isn't a two state solution but the complete take over of all of Palestine. So far as I can tell from your rants you seem to think that's a good idea.
As opposed to dropping 500lbs bombs from aircrafts on the head of defenseless civilians.
Thank you for proving I was right about your viewpoint, DQ. The Israelis are the source of all evil and all Palestinians and Muslims are saints. There are no terrorists except for the Israelis. The Palestinians, Hezbollah and Hamas are completely justified in everything they do. I really, really hesitated to make any accusations but then you posted this:
And when I go to that site you link to to prove your argument about the inherent evil of Israel I find this:
So as I understand your position, the state of Israel must be wiped from the map and if they don't like it there is no limit to what can and should be done to them. Is that the basic tenet you hold to? It seems to be. So IMO, your posts seem to be the ragings of a dedicated anti-semite who has absolutely no interest in peace in the region if it involves Israel continuing to exist. Is that accurate? A yes or no instead of refusing to answer directly by throwing up new accusations against the evil Jews would be appreciated.
And in addition…quit lying about what I say. In your latest ravings you state
Show me where I said or even implied that. Oh, you can't. Because I didn't. Ever.
No, You do not understand my position.
let me use a few concise statements to describe my position:
a) Israel wants all of Palestine and will do whatever it takes to get it.
b) Palestinians are entitled to defend themselves.
c) The Demographics are not going Israel's way and in the long run Israel will stop being a viable state, no matter what Hamas or Fatah does.
You are right, you never said or implied that. It was pure snark/sarcasm on my part!
None the less that is US policy.
If you rely on places like 1948 for your information don't be surprised when you are associated with their beliefs. They make it clear that they want the occupation ended and that by occupation they mean the existence of Israel. Since everything else you write agrees with them why should I believe you when you claim to not share that goal? Give me a good reason after reading your raving bigotry. Did you think I forgot this bit?
You went way past snark and into your inner bigotry on that one. And if Joe or anyone wants to say I shouldn't say that about you they should have you offer up something resembling a rational argument.
Roughly $3 Billion in Military Aid, no strings attached!!!
Imagine what would happen if we attached condition to the aid or just took it away. How long do you think it would take for the Israelis to start cutting deals with the Palestinians if they lost US support? 3 years? 5 years? less?
I don't judge policies by what their supposed goals are, but by what they accomplish and from what I can see at the present time Israeli policy is to take over all of Palestine and US policy is to back them to the hilt.
DQ, did you have a party after 9/11? Just wondering after you agreed that any act of terrorism the Palestinians want to commit is perfectly fine with you.
No, I didn't have a party, but I did observe that the Chickens had come home to roost.