
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can U.S. Afford NASA?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/25115/can-us-afford-nasa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/25115/can-us-afford-nasa/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 15:56:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Quijote</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/25115/can-us-afford-nasa/comment-page-1/#comment-167544</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Quijote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 14:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/25115/can-us-afford-nasa/#comment-167544</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;NASA’s 2009 budget is $17.6 billion to continue exploring the solar system, building the International Space Station, studying Earth from space and conducting aeronautics research.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That&#039;s enough to buy us a couple of month&#039;s worth of &lt;b&gt;Shock and Awe&lt;/b&gt; and there&#039;s got to be some defenseless third world rat-hole who deserves it, Zimbabwe? Venezuela? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s the only kind of government spending conservatives approve of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>NASA’s 2009 budget is $17.6 billion to continue exploring the solar system, building the International Space Station, studying Earth from space and conducting aeronautics research.</p></blockquote>
<p>That&#39;s enough to buy us a couple of month&#39;s worth of <b>Shock and Awe</b> and there&#39;s got to be some defenseless third world rat-hole who deserves it, Zimbabwe? Venezuela? </p>
<p>It&#39;s the only kind of government spending conservatives approve of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rudi</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/25115/can-us-afford-nasa/comment-page-1/#comment-167536</link>
		<dc:creator>Rudi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 06:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/25115/can-us-afford-nasa/#comment-167536</guid>
		<description>The &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.wired.com/defense/2008/08/navys-stealth-d.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;stealth destroyer&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10059987-38.html%22%3Edata&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10059987-38.h...&lt;/a&gt; mining&lt;/a&gt; are big wastes, yet only one of these programs bit the dust.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Stealth destroyer:&lt;br&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Two weeks ago, the Navy canceled plans to build the rest of its hulking stealth destroyers. At first, it looked like the DDG-1000s&#039; $5-billion-a-copy price tag was to blame. Now, it appears the real reason has slipped out: The Navy&#039;s most advanced warship is all but defenseless against one of its best-known threats.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Data mining:&lt;br&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;But the authors conclude the type of data mining that government bureaucrats would like to do--perhaps inspired by watching too many episodes of the Fox series 24--can&#039;t work. &quot;If it were possible to automatically find the digital tracks of terrorists and automatically monitor only the communications of terrorists, public policy choices in this domain would be much simpler. But it is not possible to do so.&quot; &lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nasa budget 2009: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2008/feb/HQ_08034_FY2009_budget.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;NASA Unveils $17.6 Billion Budget &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;According to FAS, the stealth destoyer is dead in the water.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/weapons/RL32109.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/weapons/RL32109.pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;As can be seen in the table, when the $1.1 billion in FY1995-FY2001 research&lt;br&gt;and development costs are included, the DD-21/DD(X)/DDG-1000 program received&lt;br&gt;a total of about $13,385 million in funding from FY1995 through FY2008. This total&lt;br&gt;includes about $6,911 million in research and development funding, and about&lt;br&gt;$6,474 million in procurement funding.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://blog.wired.com/defense/2008/08/navys-stealth-d.html" rel="nofollow">stealth destroyer</a> and &lt;a href=&#8221; <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10059987-38.html%22%3Edata" rel="nofollow">http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10059987-38.h&#8230;</a> mining are big wastes, yet only one of these programs bit the dust.</p>
<p>Stealth destroyer:<br />
<blockquote>Two weeks ago, the Navy canceled plans to build the rest of its hulking stealth destroyers. At first, it looked like the DDG-1000s&#39; $5-billion-a-copy price tag was to blame. Now, it appears the real reason has slipped out: The Navy&#39;s most advanced warship is all but defenseless against one of its best-known threats.</p></blockquote>
<p>Data mining:<br />
<blockquote>But the authors conclude the type of data mining that government bureaucrats would like to do&#8211;perhaps inspired by watching too many episodes of the Fox series 24&#8211;can&#39;t work. &#8220;If it were possible to automatically find the digital tracks of terrorists and automatically monitor only the communications of terrorists, public policy choices in this domain would be much simpler. But it is not possible to do so.&#8221; </p></blockquote>
<p>Nasa budget 2009: <a href="http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2008/feb/HQ_08034_FY2009_budget.html" rel="nofollow">NASA Unveils $17.6 Billion Budget </a></p>
<p>According to FAS, the stealth destoyer is dead in the water.<br /><a href="http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/weapons/RL32109.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/weapons/RL32109.pdf</a><br />
<blockquote>As can be seen in the table, when the $1.1 billion in FY1995-FY2001 research<br />and development costs are included, the DD-21/DD(X)/DDG-1000 program received<br />a total of about $13,385 million in funding from FY1995 through FY2008. This total<br />includes about $6,911 million in research and development funding, and about<br />$6,474 million in procurement funding.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim_Satterfield</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/25115/can-us-afford-nasa/comment-page-1/#comment-167532</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim_Satterfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 03:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/25115/can-us-afford-nasa/#comment-167532</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve got to agree with NordicAngst. If Mr. Stern has a foolproof way to avoid cost overruns for people who are developing new projects that no one has ever tried before more power to him. But I would love to hear what it is as opposed to easy criticisms. And somehow it never seems that those who criticize NASA most vociferously are aware of how much of our modern world is descended from research started by NASA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ve got to agree with NordicAngst. If Mr. Stern has a foolproof way to avoid cost overruns for people who are developing new projects that no one has ever tried before more power to him. But I would love to hear what it is as opposed to easy criticisms. And somehow it never seems that those who criticize NASA most vociferously are aware of how much of our modern world is descended from research started by NASA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NordicAngst</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/25115/can-us-afford-nasa/comment-page-1/#comment-167527</link>
		<dc:creator>NordicAngst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 01:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/25115/can-us-afford-nasa/#comment-167527</guid>
		<description>NASA is the focus of far more budget criticism than its already shoestring finances deserve.  Long term advances in science that have been a large part of what makes the USA a global power are frequently ridiculed for their perceived inefficiency by a spineless crowd that see an easy political target for their grandstanding.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The US uses around 40% of it&#039;s taxes on the military, but when trillions go missing at the Defense Department who is calling out for scalps?  Improving government accountability requires focusing on real issues of importance, not symbolic hackery that leaves our space program in shambles while China and India make rapid progress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NASA is the focus of far more budget criticism than its already shoestring finances deserve.  Long term advances in science that have been a large part of what makes the USA a global power are frequently ridiculed for their perceived inefficiency by a spineless crowd that see an easy political target for their grandstanding.</p>
<p>The US uses around 40% of it&#39;s taxes on the military, but when trillions go missing at the Defense Department who is calling out for scalps?  Improving government accountability requires focusing on real issues of importance, not symbolic hackery that leaves our space program in shambles while China and India make rapid progress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

