
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Conservative for Gay Marriage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/24911/a-conservative-for-gay-marriage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/24911/a-conservative-for-gay-marriage/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 19:14:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: HentaiLesbianPictures</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/24911/a-conservative-for-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-185352</link>
		<dc:creator>HentaiLesbianPictures</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 02:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/24911/a-conservative-for-gay-marriage/#comment-185352</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;HentaiLesbianPictures...&lt;/strong&gt;

Watch unlimited hentai videos here, the best blog for free hentai porn. we bring you exclusive hentai movies on the net, movies and clips you will never find anywhere else. pop up free!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>HentaiLesbianPictures&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Watch unlimited hentai videos here, the best blog for free hentai porn. we bring you exclusive hentai movies on the net, movies and clips you will never find anywhere else. pop up free!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hentai Monster Sex</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/24911/a-conservative-for-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-185330</link>
		<dc:creator>Hentai Monster Sex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 00:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/24911/a-conservative-for-gay-marriage/#comment-185330</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Hentai Monster Sex...&lt;/strong&gt;

Free hentai pictures, anime hardcore movies, adult comics, free sex cartoons, free rape anime uncensored movies, tentacle hentai. free pokemon pics. galleries of sailormoon, pokemon, dragonball z. 3d sex pics....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Hentai Monster Sex&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Free hentai pictures, anime hardcore movies, adult comics, free sex cartoons, free rape anime uncensored movies, tentacle hentai. free pokemon pics. galleries of sailormoon, pokemon, dragonball z. 3d sex pics&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NarutoHentaiManga</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/24911/a-conservative-for-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-185260</link>
		<dc:creator>NarutoHentaiManga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 18:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/24911/a-conservative-for-gay-marriage/#comment-185260</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;NarutoHentaiManga...&lt;/strong&gt;

Hentai Hentai Misty Pokemon Naruto Hentai— February 11, 2008@ 7:...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>NarutoHentaiManga&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Hentai Hentai Misty Pokemon Naruto Hentai— February 11, 2008@ 7:&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WarcraftHentai.net</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/24911/a-conservative-for-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-185225</link>
		<dc:creator>WarcraftHentai.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 14:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/24911/a-conservative-for-gay-marriage/#comment-185225</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;WarcraftHentai.net...&lt;/strong&gt;

famous Toon episode Mistress comics Chinese Porn Cartoons Human cartoon porn porn cartoon drawings Mania secret of green tentacle Lesbian toons suck cock and fuck elf hentai:...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>WarcraftHentai.net&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>famous Toon episode Mistress comics Chinese Porn Cartoons Human cartoon porn porn cartoon drawings Mania secret of green tentacle Lesbian toons suck cock and fuck elf hentai:&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HentaiPornGames</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/24911/a-conservative-for-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-185219</link>
		<dc:creator>HentaiPornGames</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 13:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/24911/a-conservative-for-gay-marriage/#comment-185219</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;HentaiPornGames...&lt;/strong&gt;

Crazy depicted sex scenes hentai and xxx cartoons! most beautiful hentai girls fucking with monster tentacles and more! free pics and movies!!!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>HentaiPornGames&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Crazy depicted sex scenes hentai and xxx cartoons! most beautiful hentai girls fucking with monster tentacles and more! free pics and movies!!!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NarutoHentaiVideos.net</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/24911/a-conservative-for-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-185196</link>
		<dc:creator>NarutoHentaiVideos.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 05:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/24911/a-conservative-for-gay-marriage/#comment-185196</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;NarutoHentaiVideos.net...&lt;/strong&gt;

The most important thing in the news today is the“ naked Cowboy” going after M&amp;M’ s for trying to profit by his own self invented“ gimmick.”...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>NarutoHentaiVideos.net&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The most important thing in the news today is the“ naked Cowboy” going after M&amp;M’ s for trying to profit by his own self invented“ gimmick.”&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manchester2</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/24911/a-conservative-for-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-166842</link>
		<dc:creator>Manchester2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 06:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/24911/a-conservative-for-gay-marriage/#comment-166842</guid>
		<description>Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThurmanHart</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/24911/a-conservative-for-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-166793</link>
		<dc:creator>ThurmanHart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 23:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/24911/a-conservative-for-gay-marriage/#comment-166793</guid>
		<description>Re: Incest in France - &lt;a href=&quot;http://abcnews.go.com/TheLaw/story?id=4799115&amp;page=1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://abcnews.go.com/TheLaw/story?id=4799115&amp;p...&lt;/a&gt; - &quot;If the couple moved to France, where Napoleon abolished incest laws nearly 200 years ago, their relationship wouldn&#039;t be criminal.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Belgium, Luxembourg, Netherlands: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.buzzle.com/articles/128901.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.buzzle.com/articles/128901.html&lt;/a&gt; &quot;Napoleon abolished France&#039;s incest laws in 1810. Neither is it a crime in the Netherlands, Luxembourg, Belgium, Portugal or Turkey. Japan, Argentina and Brazil have also legalised it in recent years.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bestiality laws: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lectlaw.com/files/sex13.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.lectlaw.com/files/sex13.htm&lt;/a&gt; &quot;Canada: C  YES   Criminal Code of Canada  Approx 10 years&lt;br&gt;                         Section 153&lt;br&gt;       Denmark: W  NONE&lt;br&gt;       Finland: W  NONE  -                        -&lt;br&gt;   New Zealand: C  YES   Crimes Act of 1964       Maximum 7 years PT&lt;br&gt;                         Section 143 &amp; 144&lt;br&gt;   Switzerland: W  NONE&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Incest in France &#8211; <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/TheLaw/story?id=4799115&#038;page=1" rel="nofollow">http://abcnews.go.com/TheLaw/story?id=4799115&#038;p&#8230;</a> &#8211; &#8220;If the couple moved to France, where Napoleon abolished incest laws nearly 200 years ago, their relationship wouldn&#39;t be criminal.&#8221;</p>
<p>Belgium, Luxembourg, Netherlands: <a href="http://www.buzzle.com/articles/128901.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.buzzle.com/articles/128901.html</a> &#8220;Napoleon abolished France&#39;s incest laws in 1810. Neither is it a crime in the Netherlands, Luxembourg, Belgium, Portugal or Turkey. Japan, Argentina and Brazil have also legalised it in recent years.&#8221;</p>
<p>Bestiality laws: <a href="http://www.lectlaw.com/files/sex13.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.lectlaw.com/files/sex13.htm</a> &#8220;Canada: C  YES   Criminal Code of Canada  Approx 10 years<br />                         Section 153<br />       Denmark: W  NONE<br />       Finland: W  NONE  &#8211;                        -<br />   New Zealand: C  YES   Crimes Act of 1964       Maximum 7 years PT<br />                         Section 143 &#038; 144<br />   Switzerland: W  NONE&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manchester2</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/24911/a-conservative-for-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-166720</link>
		<dc:creator>Manchester2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 05:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/24911/a-conservative-for-gay-marriage/#comment-166720</guid>
		<description>Thurman Hart,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Care to provide a few links to back up your statements? I&#039;d be happy to read them, and if he&#039;s wrong, I&#039;ll say as much. Fair enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thurman Hart,</p>
<p>Care to provide a few links to back up your statements? I&#39;d be happy to read them, and if he&#39;s wrong, I&#39;ll say as much. Fair enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dude Campus &#187; Blog Archive &#187; QC World Headlines</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/24911/a-conservative-for-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-166713</link>
		<dc:creator>Dude Campus &#187; Blog Archive &#187; QC World Headlines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 02:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/24911/a-conservative-for-gay-marriage/#comment-166713</guid>
		<description>[...] Washington D.C. - A conservative speaks out against ridiculous claims against &#8220;slippery slope&#8221; of gay marriage. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Washington D.C. &#8211; A conservative speaks out against ridiculous claims against &#8220;slippery slope&#8221; of gay marriage. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThurmanHart</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/24911/a-conservative-for-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-166701</link>
		<dc:creator>ThurmanHart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 22:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/24911/a-conservative-for-gay-marriage/#comment-166701</guid>
		<description>@manchester2: &quot;Events since Scalia&#039;s dissent vindicate his position. For example, a Jeff Jacoby editorial in the Boston Globe cites current cases challenging bans on incest here in the U.S. Already, according to Jacoby, incest is legal in Belgium, Holland, and France. Turns out Scalia wasn&#039;t ridiculous, just prescient.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If Scalia was prescient, it&#039;s a new definition of the word.  Contrary to the tone of your inflamatory statement, France, Holland, and Belgium legalized incest two hundred years ago.  I don&#039;t think Scalia is that old, and I know that Lawrence wasn&#039;t argued that long ago.  For the record, thank Napoleon for doing away with incest laws in Europe.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for the editorial from Jacobs, he needs a fact-checker.  He writes: &quot;For more than 3,000 years, a code of conduct stretching back to Sinai has kept incest unconditionally beyond the pale.&quot;  That&#039;s just stupid.  Not only are France, Holland, and Belgium on the list as allowing incest, but so is Israel - that country in the Sinai to which he so blithely refers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also predating the Lawrence case was legalized bestiality in Finland, Denmark, Holland, Germany, and elsewhere.  Polygyny - having multiple wives - has long been the law of the land in much of the world.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;ll go on the record against legalized incest, bestiality, and polygamy.  But,come one, if you can&#039;t make an honest case, then perhaps it is simply best to shut up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@manchester2: &#8220;Events since Scalia&#39;s dissent vindicate his position. For example, a Jeff Jacoby editorial in the Boston Globe cites current cases challenging bans on incest here in the U.S. Already, according to Jacoby, incest is legal in Belgium, Holland, and France. Turns out Scalia wasn&#39;t ridiculous, just prescient.&#8221;</p>
<p>If Scalia was prescient, it&#39;s a new definition of the word.  Contrary to the tone of your inflamatory statement, France, Holland, and Belgium legalized incest two hundred years ago.  I don&#39;t think Scalia is that old, and I know that Lawrence wasn&#39;t argued that long ago.  For the record, thank Napoleon for doing away with incest laws in Europe.</p>
<p>As for the editorial from Jacobs, he needs a fact-checker.  He writes: &#8220;For more than 3,000 years, a code of conduct stretching back to Sinai has kept incest unconditionally beyond the pale.&#8221;  That&#39;s just stupid.  Not only are France, Holland, and Belgium on the list as allowing incest, but so is Israel &#8211; that country in the Sinai to which he so blithely refers.</p>
<p>Also predating the Lawrence case was legalized bestiality in Finland, Denmark, Holland, Germany, and elsewhere.  Polygyny &#8211; having multiple wives &#8211; has long been the law of the land in much of the world.</p>
<p>I&#39;ll go on the record against legalized incest, bestiality, and polygamy.  But,come one, if you can&#39;t make an honest case, then perhaps it is simply best to shut up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manchester2</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/24911/a-conservative-for-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-166686</link>
		<dc:creator>Manchester2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 18:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/24911/a-conservative-for-gay-marriage/#comment-166686</guid>
		<description>uh, that&#039;s &quot;slippery slope&quot; -- not sure what a &quot;slipper slope&quot; is!  : - )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>uh, that&#39;s &#8220;slippery slope&#8221; &#8212; not sure what a &#8220;slipper slope&#8221; is!  : &#8211; )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manchester2</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/24911/a-conservative-for-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-166685</link>
		<dc:creator>Manchester2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 18:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/24911/a-conservative-for-gay-marriage/#comment-166685</guid>
		<description>PattonGuy, the original post by Dennis cited another blog that called the polygamy/bestiality arguments &quot;ridiculous.&quot; My post underscores that - whether you accept Scalia&#039;s arguments or not - they provide distinguished precedent for making said arguments. Jacoby&#039;s facts on other countries that have now legalized incest lend weight to Scalia&#039;s concerns. Sometimes &quot;slipper slope&quot; is a logical fallacy; other times, it&#039;s as accurate as today&#039;s headlines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PattonGuy, the original post by Dennis cited another blog that called the polygamy/bestiality arguments &#8220;ridiculous.&#8221; My post underscores that &#8211; whether you accept Scalia&#39;s arguments or not &#8211; they provide distinguished precedent for making said arguments. Jacoby&#39;s facts on other countries that have now legalized incest lend weight to Scalia&#39;s concerns. Sometimes &#8220;slipper slope&#8221; is a logical fallacy; other times, it&#39;s as accurate as today&#39;s headlines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silhouette</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/24911/a-conservative-for-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-166683</link>
		<dc:creator>Silhouette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 18:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/24911/a-conservative-for-gay-marriage/#comment-166683</guid>
		<description>The link is simply that humans learn socially and sexuality is not genetic, it is imprinted in puberty with rare exceptions.  Farmers and ranchers know and depend on this fact to mold certain sexual behaviors at the onset of puberty in certain animals, particularly stud animals.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Child molesters were made not from a natural attraction to children, but from being inappropriately approached themselves in youth and having &quot;sex between adults and children as love&quot; immutably imprinted on them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If we hold high the deviant example of sexualtiy as for pleasure only, instead of for procreation and pleasure between men and women, the potential for imprinting this &quot;social lesson&quot; is dire.  Gays, once imprinted at puberty are no more capable of changing their preference than a gosling can having falsely identified &#039;mommy&quot; as the rancher it first saw when it was hatched.  So we shouldn&#039;t hate or descriminate against gays in day to day life.  But we also should not hold their condition up to be emulated or socially followed as &quot;normal&quot;.  Sex originated for procreating young.  The pleasureable nerve endings leading to all sorts of variations on that original plan may not be in the best interest of humanity to normalize..&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Above all we need to thoroughly understand the nature of sexuality as imprinted in puberty vs the assumed &quot;genetic&quot; drive.  Homosexuals are correct that their preference is no longer their choice.  But it was once.  Frustration, shyness or inappropriate contact from an adult are the likely culprits that set their &quot;preference&quot; in stone.  So we should not hate or treat gays poorly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The link is simply that humans learn socially and sexuality is not genetic, it is imprinted in puberty with rare exceptions.  Farmers and ranchers know and depend on this fact to mold certain sexual behaviors at the onset of puberty in certain animals, particularly stud animals.</p>
<p>Child molesters were made not from a natural attraction to children, but from being inappropriately approached themselves in youth and having &#8220;sex between adults and children as love&#8221; immutably imprinted on them.</p>
<p>If we hold high the deviant example of sexualtiy as for pleasure only, instead of for procreation and pleasure between men and women, the potential for imprinting this &#8220;social lesson&#8221; is dire.  Gays, once imprinted at puberty are no more capable of changing their preference than a gosling can having falsely identified &#39;mommy&#8221; as the rancher it first saw when it was hatched.  So we shouldn&#39;t hate or descriminate against gays in day to day life.  But we also should not hold their condition up to be emulated or socially followed as &#8220;normal&#8221;.  Sex originated for procreating young.  The pleasureable nerve endings leading to all sorts of variations on that original plan may not be in the best interest of humanity to normalize..</p>
<p>Above all we need to thoroughly understand the nature of sexuality as imprinted in puberty vs the assumed &#8220;genetic&#8221; drive.  Homosexuals are correct that their preference is no longer their choice.  But it was once.  Frustration, shyness or inappropriate contact from an adult are the likely culprits that set their &#8220;preference&#8221; in stone.  So we should not hate or treat gays poorly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PattonGuy</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/24911/a-conservative-for-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-166678</link>
		<dc:creator>PattonGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 17:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/24911/a-conservative-for-gay-marriage/#comment-166678</guid>
		<description>Manchester2- How does Adam &amp; Steve = Lolita or Warren Jeffs?  It doesn&#039;t.  Let&#039;s be frank here.  And where did Justice Scalia come by his wondrous powers of prophecy?  Time-traveling?  Or is he just so awesome that he&#039;s psychic?  Tell me, how can you make the leap from &quot;two homosexuals marrying&quot; to &quot;polygamy, incest, and bestiality&quot;?  It can&#039;t be a leap of faith, because I have faith, and there&#039;s no way I can make that leap.  It can&#039;t be logic, because that doesn&#039;t make any logical sense.  Tell me, how does one get to that conclusion?  Because I have to admit- I&#039;m baffled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Manchester2- How does Adam &#038; Steve = Lolita or Warren Jeffs?  It doesn&#39;t.  Let&#39;s be frank here.  And where did Justice Scalia come by his wondrous powers of prophecy?  Time-traveling?  Or is he just so awesome that he&#39;s psychic?  Tell me, how can you make the leap from &#8220;two homosexuals marrying&#8221; to &#8220;polygamy, incest, and bestiality&#8221;?  It can&#39;t be a leap of faith, because I have faith, and there&#39;s no way I can make that leap.  It can&#39;t be logic, because that doesn&#39;t make any logical sense.  Tell me, how does one get to that conclusion?  Because I have to admit- I&#39;m baffled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PattonGuy</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/24911/a-conservative-for-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-166677</link>
		<dc:creator>PattonGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 17:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/24911/a-conservative-for-gay-marriage/#comment-166677</guid>
		<description>That was very excellent.  Thank you for pointing me to that link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was very excellent.  Thank you for pointing me to that link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manchester2</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/24911/a-conservative-for-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-166671</link>
		<dc:creator>Manchester2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 16:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/24911/a-conservative-for-gay-marriage/#comment-166671</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve attempted unsuccessfully to fix that first link, which is broken. Google &quot;scalia dissent lawrence vs. texas&quot; to read his opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ve attempted unsuccessfully to fix that first link, which is broken. Google &#8220;scalia dissent lawrence vs. texas&#8221; to read his opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manchester2</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/24911/a-conservative-for-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-166669</link>
		<dc:creator>Manchester2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 16:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/24911/a-conservative-for-gay-marriage/#comment-166669</guid>
		<description>This &quot;ridiculous line of thought&quot; figures in the 2003 dissenting opinion of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, in the &lt;i&gt;Lawrence vs. Texas&lt;/i&gt; ruling that overturned all remaining state sodomy laws. The ruling can be read &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.orthodoxytoday.org/articles2/ScaliaLawrenceDissent.shtml/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. Scalia cites the legalization of polygamy, incest, and bestiality as likely outcomes of the &lt;i&gt;Lawrence&lt;/i&gt; decision, since there would no longer be a basis in law for prohibiting them.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Events since Scalia&#039;s dissent vindicate his position. For example, a Jeff Jacoby &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2007/05/02/lawful_incest_may_be_on_its_way/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;editorial&lt;/a&gt; in the &lt;i&gt;Boston Globe&lt;/i&gt; cites current cases challenging bans on incest here in the U.S. Already, according to Jacoby, incest is legal in Belgium, Holland, and France. Turns out Scalia wasn&#039;t ridiculous, just prescient.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This &#8220;ridiculous line of thought&#8221; figures in the 2003 dissenting opinion of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, in the <i>Lawrence vs. Texas</i> ruling that overturned all remaining state sodomy laws. The ruling can be read <a href="http://www.orthodoxytoday.org/articles2/ScaliaLawrenceDissent.shtml/" rel="nofollow">here</a>. Scalia cites the legalization of polygamy, incest, and bestiality as likely outcomes of the <i>Lawrence</i> decision, since there would no longer be a basis in law for prohibiting them.  </p>
<p>Events since Scalia&#39;s dissent vindicate his position. For example, a Jeff Jacoby <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2007/05/02/lawful_incest_may_be_on_its_way/" rel="nofollow">editorial</a> in the <i>Boston Globe</i> cites current cases challenging bans on incest here in the U.S. Already, according to Jacoby, incest is legal in Belgium, Holland, and France. Turns out Scalia wasn&#39;t ridiculous, just prescient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

