An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

A Lesson For Wall Street Greed

After reading Michael Lewis’s outstanding article on the greed, avarice, stupidity and cunning manipulation by Wall Street that dropped the U.S. economy to its knees, what a relief it is to learn of one business family who understands and appreciates how it achieved success.

Its employees.

While many executives compensate themselves with millions of dollars for running their corporations into the ground and ruining the credit and life savings of millions of Americans, the Spungen family of Waukegan, Ill., shared its $6.6 million fortune with 230 employees.

Now that’s the spirit of American capitalism. What a terrific gesture in these trying times. It speaks proudly of U.S. small businesses which drive our economy and puts in perspective the shame cast upon those Wall Street bastards who destroyed it.

The Spungen family, owners of Peer Bearing Co., manufactures ball bearings in the U.S. and England. It sold to a Swedish company in September for an undisclosed amount.

Danny Spungen, whose grandfather founded the company in 1941, said it was a unanimous family decision to thank employees with the bonuses. Amounts varied and were based on years of service.

“They treated us like extended family,” said Maria Dima, who works at Peer Bearing along with her husband, Valentin, and received a somewhat smaller check than his $33,000. “We won the lottery.”

Danny Spungen and other family members signed, by hand, two thank-you cards to each employee, one in Spanish and one in English. Each card was printed with all the workers’ names and the years they were hired. The text expressed gratitude for “the loyalty and hard work of our employees over the years.”

Ironic, isn’t it, that ball bearings are crucial to grease the engines that makes the mechanical world go around.

Compare that to the con game by Wall Street geeks fresh out of Ivy League schools who concocted a Ponzi scam so sinister no one but themselves could understand. Not the CEOs. Not the CFOs. Not the regulators, And certainly not Congress with $700 billion laughingly referred to as a rescue package.

You think we’re tough? Read Lewis’s article “The End” on www.portfolio.com.

cross posted on The Remmers Report

  • Another great story, Steve Demos, founder of White Wave and creator of Silk.

    "his company was sold to Dean Foods, Inc. in a highly publicized $295 million transaction. At that time White Wave had about 150 employees, of which 100 had worked for the company for 2 years or more. In an unprecedented move for a packaged foods business, Steve and his managers refused to sell unless every employee who had been with the company for 2 years or more received something from the sale. The lawyers were astounded by Steve's request—it took them three months to work out the legal mechanics, which could have jeopardized the sale of the company. In the end, $15 million of the sale price was handed out to about 100 people, many of whom didn't speak English. One, a truck driver named Pete, received almost $400,000. There was no legal obligation to do this, and Steve lights up when he speaks about handing them the checks and sometimes having to explain through a translator why they were getting this money."

    http://thewellnessrevolution.paulzanepilzer.com...
  • DLS
    Hopefully you realize that in no way is this normal, ordinary, customary, and much less obligatory.

    Nor is government, least of all federal, intervention in the economy merited.

    Having said that, I'm almost at the point where I'd accept or at least note aloud the superiority of the "bottom-up" general-population approach to any federal bailout. Rather than engage in favoritism, incompetence, or a combination of the two by the Wall Street insider-oriented Treasury Department, I'd say it's less harmful to have a "citizen dividend" (stupid name, but illustrative nevertheless) issued to all taxpayers. (It's morally wrong to favor the deadbeat borrowers at the expense of those who didn't borrow more than they could afford.)

    It's much more generous of a concession by me than the case of honest environmentalists' concession about the relative substantial environmental superiority of nuclear power over alternatives, but perhaps equally if almost as begrudging. We shouldn't do it, in theory, but giving equal chunks of bailout money to all taxpayers is better than the games we're seeing with favoritism toward some financial firms and their newsworthy misuse of the money. (It has nothing to do with their reluctance to resume lending; that is fully sane behavior. Giving money to individuals does not imply they will spend it or resume borrowing, necessarily, either.)

    If we're roughly at 300 million (USA), population approximately at replacement level fertility, that's 150 million adults (taxpayers). Divide whatever has not only only been spent but what is contemplated on being spent by this 150 million divisor (or choose a better one if you have a better one), and ask yourselves if that would be better, or not as bad, as what we see now. Or which benefiaries are more, or less-less, deserving, at the very least.

    [scowl]
  • kritt11
    DLS- I never knew you were a socialist, LOL!
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC