<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Word of the Year: Bailout</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/24658/word-of-the-year-bailout/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/24658/word-of-the-year-bailout/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:24:33 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DLS</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/24658/word-of-the-year-bailout/comment-page-1/#comment-165645</link>
		<dc:creator>DLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 19:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/bailouts/24658/word-of-the-year-bailout/#comment-165645</guid>
		<description>We all know what &quot;bailout&quot; means.  What kind of person would argue about its meaning at this time?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There never was a guarantee a bailout would work.  (That is, a _real_ bailout free of political-connection corruption and misuse of the funds given.)  Not for banks, not for the failed-for-more-than-thirty-years-with-no-facing-of-reality Detroit Three, not for homeowners who borrowed more than they could afford because they were greedy, not in any case.  Banks won&#039;t lend if they&#039;re scared of poor risks; people won&#039;t borrow or spend (what kind of people would demand they borrow?) if they are given money, necessarily.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As to what happened, it was greed, greed, greed.  People thought they had instant riches without effort in the stock bubble, then the housing bubble.  The rest of it involving the financial operators and the other players was just more greed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all know what &#8220;bailout&#8221; means.  What kind of person would argue about its meaning at this time?</p>
<p>There never was a guarantee a bailout would work.  (That is, a _real_ bailout free of political-connection corruption and misuse of the funds given.)  Not for banks, not for the failed-for-more-than-thirty-years-with-no-facing-of-reality Detroit Three, not for homeowners who borrowed more than they could afford because they were greedy, not in any case.  Banks won&#39;t lend if they&#39;re scared of poor risks; people won&#39;t borrow or spend (what kind of people would demand they borrow?) if they are given money, necessarily.</p>
<p>As to what happened, it was greed, greed, greed.  People thought they had instant riches without effort in the stock bubble, then the housing bubble.  The rest of it involving the financial operators and the other players was just more greed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
