An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Forget Sarah / Find Richard

Over the last three weeks, I have come to a startling conclusion, the true believers in the Republican Party do not understand why they were showed the door on November 4th. As Roger Simon’s article points out, the power brokers of the party are still under the illusion that their message was correct, it was the fault of either the messenger (John McCain), the economy, or the current resident of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

As a voice crying out in the wilderness, whose calls to RNC-chair candidate Michael Steele have yet to be answered, it falls to me to communicate the obvious to the politically inept… if the Republican Party does not change its message, we will not have another Republican president in my lifetime (and I am only 43).

The reason for the gloomy prediction is the Electoral College and the increase of Hispanic voters. In 2008, Barack Obama received more than seventy percent of the Hispanic vote. These new voters in key swing states such as CO, FL, NM, and NV switched these 46 electoral votes from red in 2004 to blue in 2008. Every one of these states increased their number of Hispanic votes by an average of five percent between 2004 and 2008. If our hard-line policy with immigration stays the same, there is a possibility of Hispanic voters in Arizona and Texas becoming a large enough minority in these states to switch them from red to blue in eight years.

The bottom line is that the Republican Party needs to forget Sarah Palin and find a Richard Nixon-type candidate in 2012. Richard Nixon was a pragmatic conservative and was able to win two national elections when the electoral map was in a state of flux due to an increase of new minority voters, African-Americans. Richard Nixon used his presidency to add teeth to Affirmative Action policies and to begin Minority and Women Business initiatives in the federal government. Nixon made inroads to this new voting block while keeping his conservative principles of small business growth and development.

Can we leave behind the non-policy ideologue that is embodied by Sarah Palin? Or are we destined to repeat this failure of leadership in the 2012 election cycle? Finding this Nixon-esque balance is not only possible and achievable, with the changing demographics of the electoral map, this balance will be necessary to win back the Congress and the White House.

  • StockBoySF
    I actually hate to say this because it comes across as "un-moderate" and so I've refrained from saying it the last couple of weeks, thinking (hoping) that the thought was just one of those momentary, ill-conceived notions (and it may still be)... but it hasn't gone away...

    Anyway, I have this nagging feeling that Palin is a little psychotic, or deranged or at the very least not quite right....

    Does anyone else have a similar thought or am I the one being looney here (and I just may, considering I can't stand her, though I've never thought this about anyone else in the political world that I've disliked, not even Cheney or Bush).

    So yes Tony, you are right. The Republicans need to forget Palin and choose a pragmatist. I'm sad to see that the Republicans might be "banished" because I think they are needed in the US. At least the "good" Republican part of smaller government, etc.- not the religious righters. I hope the GOP can think their problems through and come up with a solution that will help America, not just the religious right, since they are the party of the intolerant religious right. If they want to be the party of the religious right, they will continue to lose power and influence. But they have a right to define their party as they see fit. But they can't whine when mainstream America does not agree with their intolerance. I hope a new and sensible party develops (and fast!) to replace the old Republican sensibilities.
  • I hate to point out the obvious, Tony, but the GOP followed your advice this year, nominating the paradigmatic "pragmatic conservative" in John McCain. And what happened? He flatlined until he picked a running mate who breathed life into his campaign, pulled briefly ahead, and was shipwrecked by the financial crisis (it didn't help matters that he helped run himself onto the rocks with his "campaign suspension" stunt). If it didn't work this year, why would you think it will work in 2012 (or more to the point, 2016, since 2012 will likely be decided based 100% on public perception of President Obama's first term).
  • superdestroyer
    the idea that the Republicans can out pander the Democrats and get the Hispanic vote is laughable. Richard Nixon did not get any black votes but confused the conservative message by pandering with affirmative action which in those days was hard quotas, separate admissions and hiring standards, and race norming.

    the Republican Paerty is being buried by demographics. The only hope for any conservative idea is for conservatives to stop voting in the Republican primary and start voting in the Democratic primary. If all of the current Republican voters would have voted in the Iowa Democratic caucus, President-Elect Obama may have never gotten the nomination.
  • jeff_pickens
    Tony,
    get ready for a Sarah Palin television commercial blitz during football season, as "Our Country Deserves Better" PAC shares a "Thank Sarah Palin" bonanza for us all to enjoy.

    The latest from MSNBC: "In the newer, post-election study, her favorable was 48 percent and unfavorable 47 percent among all Americans. "
    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27909954/

    I hope she can learn to lose that fake Midwestern? accent before she is paraded around the country representing "real" Americans again.
  • Richard Nixon was certainly pragmatic compared to modern conservatives, but he does not offer a good way out of the GOP's problems.

    It was Nixon who started to use the culture wars to obtain votes, started to pander to the religious right (while the more ideologically conservative Barry Goldwater opposed their influence), and attacked the "liberal" media.

    The Republicans have many problems. This includes both their message and the types of politics which they embraced in the Nixon years. Using Nixon as an example might provide some improvement in terms of pragmatism over ideology compared to Bush, but following Nixon's example would also continue many of the problems which have hurt the Republicans.

    Even Nixon's pragmatism has its limits as a model, such as the way in which Nixon got bogged down in Vietnam. Republicans would have been smarter to have done the opposite from Nixon and avoid getting into a quagmire in Iraq.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC