An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Americans Are So Weird

I recently visited a friend from Australia and she said the funniest thing about our culture is how serious everyone takes things, while simultaneously being proudly ignorant and isolated. Turkeygate is such a great example of this. I found the video hilarious for two reasons. First it is just very ironic that she had a pomp-and- circumstance media event pardoning a turkey and then immediately held a low-key interview where turkeys were being killed in the background. And second, what kind of background is that for an interview?! I would have found it equally humorous if there had been professional wrestling or a loud bingo tournament in the background. It is just so absurdly random and odd.

But, as is our wont, it has somehow turned into a Big Deal and people are absolutely shocked that they were allowed to see where their food comes from. I find the reaction pretty funny too, but also disturbing on a number of levels. The most obvious level is that people have become so distant from the basics of life that it makes it very hard to appreciate it, or discuss the impact of food policies. On a deeper level, it is bigger than that and explains so much of our outlook.

People are disgusted by seeing turkeys die — even as they readily consume meat — and are fixated on their own reaction. I have to confess I don’t have a whole lot of experience on farms, but that machine looked remarkably humane, and I’m way more concerned with the standards of how we treat animals when they are alive, for a number of moral and practical reasons. A commenter said that the conditions looked very humane and I believe him. That farm and video should be applauded, if anything.

To go even further, I have to say that it really reminded me of the War on Terror; well wars in general but especially this one. People obviously know that their meat comes from animals that are killed, and basically everyone should know about the immensely cramped and dirty conditions that many of them are raised in, but only seeing it provided revulsion. People know that “war is hell” and destroys so much, but are glib about it until they are in one or see the consequences. Numerous stories of questionable treatment of detainees came out very early, but only seeing pictures of Abu Ghraib caused outrage.

The conclusion is twofold: control the images and you can do pretty much anything, and people are so self involved that you merely have to punish those that dared offend to offend the sensibilities — as opposed to addressing anything on a core level. Ignorance is bliss and all that; I realize that this is just a basic trait of humanity but my friends from other countries say that we are the worst.

  • DLS
    Actually, Mikkel, to many of us this turkey story never has been a big deal and hasn't been in our thoughts.

    As for Abu Ghraib, it wasn't so much that the images were powerful; of course they were. You have to realize that for ages there are people who have been opponents of US efforts abroad simply because they were opposed to the US, and they have complained without basis time after time. The reason is that the Abu Ghraib story was so striking was because it was something so many of us rightly never believed would happen. (Even then, we were grown up, not weird or otherwise wrongful; we weren't Outraged! [tm] or whining about it, but were disgusted by it and we began to lose confidence in and respect for the Bush administration as well as for those involved in the imprisonment directly, "hands-on" [ugly choice of words, but apt].)
  • mikkel
    I'm sure most people haven't thought about it, but I've seen it on Balloon Juice and that's my barometer for deciding whether it is actually being talked about or not. John Cole is a good barometer for someone that isn't obsessive but also keeps track of internet memes.

    But that's what I couldn't believe at the time. Many people were saying that they didn't believe it could be happening, even though many of the people speaking out against it in press were administration and military officials with direct knowledge or former intelligence officials that reviewed the legal proclamations and concluded it was very likely happening. But when this was pointed out, it still didn't seem to matter.

    Also Outraged! never helped anyone but principled has. I can't believe how much focus there has been on Bush rather than the principles of his reign. I was so angry about the Alito confirmation because everyone was talking about what he once said about abortion or something rather than that he was one of the original lawyers that worked on the Unitary Executive theory. So here are all these people that are absolutely Outraged! at Bush for things, but then talk about a completely tangential topic when there is a Supreme Court justice that might (I still don't really know) hold views that Bush had the authority to do it........the same source of authority that Republicans got their panties in a bunch about with Clinton and warned that Obama was going to do.

    Focusing on the individual (idea or person) for the minute of hate or love and then declaring that the opposite is good/bad is another facet of self absorption.
  • D. E.Rodriguez
    Sometimes, it takes seeing "the pictures" first, before "addressing anything on a core level." Whether it is Turkey Gate or Abu Ghraib.

    Right or wrong, sophisticated or not, self-involvement (or self-absorption) or not, this can and is part of human nature.

    Some are fortunate enough to address issues on a core level right away...for some (weird?) Americans it takes looking at "a picture" first ...nothing wrong with that.
  • mikkel
    Yes I agree, but the point I was (trying) to make is that people get stuck on the pictures themselves. In Vietnam for instance the pictures that were released really created a waterfall that was the beginning of a mass movement that was boiling under the surface. I can appreciate that.

    I am referring to what I felt like about Abu Ghraib was that the pictures made people upset but in general once they were out of the news cycle things went back to status quo. They didn't really seem to factor into public or political consciousness when Congress passed the detainee bill for instance. It seems like there are certain things were people have strong moral beliefs that they mention in the abstract, then see them violated and get upset, but when they aren't dominating the political cycle anymore then people go back to being disengaged. Do you agree, or am I off base?
  • D. E.Rodriguez
    I agree up to a point, and that point being that, true, when certain issues "aren't dominating the political cycle anymore then people go back to being disengaged.."

    But, then it is up to those journalists, activists, and others with a more "retentive" psyche to keep those "pictures" (and I am not necessarily referring to photos), those issues, those emotions in the forefront of the public and political consciousness.

    I have tried to do just that with respect to equal rights for gays in the military ("don't ask-don't tell"), and have sometimes received grief from those who feel that "one needs to wait for the right time."

    Well, in my opinion, the right time for anything you believe deeply in is NOW.

    Anyway, Mikkel, I think I understand your overall point, and I agree. Still, images (turkeys being butchered, or human beings being degraded--and I don't mean in any way to equate the two, or to belittle the latter) are powerful calls to action--or writing.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC