
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Asif Zardari: &#8216;India &amp; Pakistan Share Blood Ties&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/24532/asif-zardari-india-pakistan-share-blood-ties/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/24532/asif-zardari-india-pakistan-share-blood-ties/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 15:46:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkAmrey</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/24532/asif-zardari-india-pakistan-share-blood-ties/comment-page-1/#comment-167075</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkAmrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 19:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/war/war-on-terror/al-qaeda/24532/asif-zardari-india-pakistan-share-blood-ties/#comment-167075</guid>
		<description>Both India and Pakistan share genetics. For instance, the Punjab (in both countries) share a historical genetic base. When Sikhism came into being, it was due to Islam, and the punjabi became a Sikh. Prior to this, when moslems came to India, it was due to Islam, and the punjabi became a moslem. The Punjab is now 65% in Pakistan, despite the Sikh&#039;s identification of the Punjab as their homeland.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In terms of India and Pakistan, India should ensure that its future is inherent in its national identity, rather then including &#039;partnerships&#039; with those countries that are prone to continual religious indoctrination, as this will only lead to &#039;baggage&#039;. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It would be wise for India to neutralise its embrace with Pakistan, and let Pakistan take its own international seat in the international economy, rather than &#039;piggy back&#039; on to India&#039;s international business success.   &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As in many Islamic countries, religious doctrines do not allow a true focus on reality, and any &#039;partnership&#039; with Pakistan will only bring India towards a partnership that cannot sustain competitive value in the international arena. This is because these religious doctrines are based on primitive values which do not hold added value to the international customer, because competitors are not &#039;baggaged&#039; with this competitive inefficiency. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The issue for India therefore, is whether it requires a further input, interms of doctrines, which dilute the truth, in relation to reality, and hence hold it back from international and national economic success. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is not a coincidence that China, South Korea and Japan are focusing on partnership and are making joint efforts to overcome the current economic climate. It is also no coincidence that they excluded India (even though India is destined to become the third biggest economy in the world). &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This exclusion is entirely due to India&#039;s current internal &#039;religious baggage&#039;, India should therefore avoid at all costs, adding to this &#039;baggage&#039; by embracing Pakistan, because Pakistan (similar to all Islamic countries) is destined to continually suffer from the &#039;baggage&#039; of Islamic religious interference in its national legislation infrastructure, and therefore prone to more likely staying a Third World country, and that is not the destiny of India.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both India and Pakistan share genetics. For instance, the Punjab (in both countries) share a historical genetic base. When Sikhism came into being, it was due to Islam, and the punjabi became a Sikh. Prior to this, when moslems came to India, it was due to Islam, and the punjabi became a moslem. The Punjab is now 65% in Pakistan, despite the Sikh&#39;s identification of the Punjab as their homeland.</p>
<p>In terms of India and Pakistan, India should ensure that its future is inherent in its national identity, rather then including &#39;partnerships&#39; with those countries that are prone to continual religious indoctrination, as this will only lead to &#39;baggage&#39;. </p>
<p>It would be wise for India to neutralise its embrace with Pakistan, and let Pakistan take its own international seat in the international economy, rather than &#39;piggy back&#39; on to India&#39;s international business success.   </p>
<p>As in many Islamic countries, religious doctrines do not allow a true focus on reality, and any &#39;partnership&#39; with Pakistan will only bring India towards a partnership that cannot sustain competitive value in the international arena. This is because these religious doctrines are based on primitive values which do not hold added value to the international customer, because competitors are not &#39;baggaged&#39; with this competitive inefficiency. </p>
<p>The issue for India therefore, is whether it requires a further input, interms of doctrines, which dilute the truth, in relation to reality, and hence hold it back from international and national economic success. </p>
<p>It is not a coincidence that China, South Korea and Japan are focusing on partnership and are making joint efforts to overcome the current economic climate. It is also no coincidence that they excluded India (even though India is destined to become the third biggest economy in the world). </p>
<p>This exclusion is entirely due to India&#39;s current internal &#39;religious baggage&#39;, India should therefore avoid at all costs, adding to this &#39;baggage&#39; by embracing Pakistan, because Pakistan (similar to all Islamic countries) is destined to continually suffer from the &#39;baggage&#39; of Islamic religious interference in its national legislation infrastructure, and therefore prone to more likely staying a Third World country, and that is not the destiny of India.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trueman</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/24532/asif-zardari-india-pakistan-share-blood-ties/comment-page-1/#comment-165602</link>
		<dc:creator>trueman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 13:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/war/war-on-terror/al-qaeda/24532/asif-zardari-india-pakistan-share-blood-ties/#comment-165602</guid>
		<description>President Asif Ali Zardari has taken the most appropriate step in Pakistan ever taken by a politician in Pakistan. By and large the Civis are less belligerent towards India than the Generals in Pakistan. Simply because the latter can reap the benefits of anti-India hysteria created through a patriotic Pakistani vs. Indian Enemy stance. Same thing perhaps is true in case of India where the Civis do the same thing against Pakistan. The time has now come to realise that both India and Pakistan have a common destiny but it has b to be reached through two sovereign, independent nations collaborating together for mutual benefits. Where as majority of Pakistanis now do believe that the belligerence towards India have brought no fruits but an over dependence on others, on the other hand India too should refrain from behaving as a would be super power exercising a hegemonistic attitude towards our country being the first step.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Asif Ali Zardari has taken the most appropriate step in Pakistan ever taken by a politician in Pakistan. By and large the Civis are less belligerent towards India than the Generals in Pakistan. Simply because the latter can reap the benefits of anti-India hysteria created through a patriotic Pakistani vs. Indian Enemy stance. Same thing perhaps is true in case of India where the Civis do the same thing against Pakistan. The time has now come to realise that both India and Pakistan have a common destiny but it has b to be reached through two sovereign, independent nations collaborating together for mutual benefits. Where as majority of Pakistanis now do believe that the belligerence towards India have brought no fruits but an over dependence on others, on the other hand India too should refrain from behaving as a would be super power exercising a hegemonistic attitude towards our country being the first step.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uzairsdad</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/24532/asif-zardari-india-pakistan-share-blood-ties/comment-page-1/#comment-165159</link>
		<dc:creator>uzairsdad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 13:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/war/war-on-terror/al-qaeda/24532/asif-zardari-india-pakistan-share-blood-ties/#comment-165159</guid>
		<description>I think President Zardari is moving in the right direction. Since it is not possible to change geographical realities it is time to accept ground realities and adjust to them as best as we could. For too long India and Pakistan have wasted their time, energy and vital resources in viewing the other as an enemy. All this must now come to an end. As far as Kashmir is concerned I feel that a solution shall be found if we move forward in other fields. We can surely wait for sometime more having waited for so long already. Of course India too must reciprocate in the same manner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think President Zardari is moving in the right direction. Since it is not possible to change geographical realities it is time to accept ground realities and adjust to them as best as we could. For too long India and Pakistan have wasted their time, energy and vital resources in viewing the other as an enemy. All this must now come to an end. As far as Kashmir is concerned I feel that a solution shall be found if we move forward in other fields. We can surely wait for sometime more having waited for so long already. Of course India too must reciprocate in the same manner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

