<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Copyright Deal Moves Forward</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/24462/google-copyright-deal-moves-forward/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/24462/google-copyright-deal-moves-forward/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 09:48:33 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Flat World Knowledge, Publisher of Open Source Textbooks, Secures $700,000 In Funding &#124; Educationload.com</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/24462/google-copyright-deal-moves-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-169255</link>
		<dc:creator>Flat World Knowledge, Publisher of Open Source Textbooks, Secures $700,000 In Funding &#124; Educationload.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/science/technology/google/24462/google-copyright-deal-moves-forward/#comment-169255</guid>
		<description>[...] Google Copyright Deal Moves Forward [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google Copyright Deal Moves Forward [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blog.twidox.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Authors, Publishers, and Google Reach Landmark Settlement</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/24462/google-copyright-deal-moves-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-168593</link>
		<dc:creator>blog.twidox.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Authors, Publishers, and Google Reach Landmark Settlement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 09:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/science/technology/google/24462/google-copyright-deal-moves-forward/#comment-168593</guid>
		<description>[...] Google Copyright Deal Moves Forward [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google Copyright Deal Moves Forward [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisWWW</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/24462/google-copyright-deal-moves-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-164755</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisWWW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 22:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/science/technology/google/24462/google-copyright-deal-moves-forward/#comment-164755</guid>
		<description>Our copyright system is sooo screwed up. A corporation can sit on a copyright for anywhere from 90-120 years. This is a complete perversion of what copyright was supposed to accomplish.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The law was supposed to protect the investment in time and money by the work&#039;s author. If you couldn&#039;t profit from a creative endeavor, why bother? Then, after a reasonable period of time, work was supposed to enter the public domain so society as a whole would benefit from derivative works.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Instead, our copyright system has been perverted into a cash cow for corporations who re-release the same stuff decade after decade, hardly adding any value to society.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Meanwhile, new artists are prevented from building on the works of stuff as old as 50 years without paying prohibitive licensing fees. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This stifles creativity and leaves artists and corporations with little incentive to create new work. Why bother if you can perpetually profit from the old stuff?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our copyright system is sooo screwed up. A corporation can sit on a copyright for anywhere from 90-120 years. This is a complete perversion of what copyright was supposed to accomplish.</p>
<p>The law was supposed to protect the investment in time and money by the work&#39;s author. If you couldn&#39;t profit from a creative endeavor, why bother? Then, after a reasonable period of time, work was supposed to enter the public domain so society as a whole would benefit from derivative works.</p>
<p>Instead, our copyright system has been perverted into a cash cow for corporations who re-release the same stuff decade after decade, hardly adding any value to society.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, new artists are prevented from building on the works of stuff as old as 50 years without paying prohibitive licensing fees. </p>
<p>This stifles creativity and leaves artists and corporations with little incentive to create new work. Why bother if you can perpetually profit from the old stuff?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
