<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Kind Of Transition Will We Have?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/24404/what-kind-of-transition-will-we-have/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/24404/what-kind-of-transition-will-we-have/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:07:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AustinRoth</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/24404/what-kind-of-transition-will-we-have/comment-page-1/#comment-164447</link>
		<dc:creator>AustinRoth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 16:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/at-tmv/24404/what-kind-of-transition-will-we-have/#comment-164447</guid>
		<description>As part of the transition watch, one of the top-level posters should start a &#039;Bush pardons pool&#039;. That is always an interesting part of the end of a Presidency, and more so in this case, between the expectations of the Left that he will pardon his entire administration, and his own actual tendency to be very stingy with pardons throughout his career.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As part of the transition watch, one of the top-level posters should start a &#39;Bush pardons pool&#39;. That is always an interesting part of the end of a Presidency, and more so in this case, between the expectations of the Left that he will pardon his entire administration, and his own actual tendency to be very stingy with pardons throughout his career.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marlowecan</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/24404/what-kind-of-transition-will-we-have/comment-page-1/#comment-164444</link>
		<dc:creator>Marlowecan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/at-tmv/24404/what-kind-of-transition-will-we-have/#comment-164444</guid>
		<description>Dear Komrade Rudi:   Your comment   &quot;I would LMAO if the Demonocrats resurrect the &#039;nuclear option&#039; , maybe even go beyond judges&quot;  is well-taken.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I, too, will be very amused to see the epic flip-flop to come:  the Republicans blathering about protecting the traditions of the Senate . . . and the Democrats talking about the need to eliminate obstruction. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Will there be a new &quot;Gang of 14&quot; do you think?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You know . . . this flip-flop makes matters very simple for those of us who observe politics.  &lt;br&gt;We just need to replace &quot;Republican&quot; with &quot;Democrat&quot; and vice versa at the header of most institutional-related Talking Points, and we are good to go. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I also note that Obama has been condemned by some folks in the European press as a &quot;war monger&quot; for his committment to Afghanistan.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Everything old is new again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Komrade Rudi:   Your comment   &#8220;I would LMAO if the Demonocrats resurrect the &#39;nuclear option&#39; , maybe even go beyond judges&#8221;  is well-taken.</p>
<p>I, too, will be very amused to see the epic flip-flop to come:  the Republicans blathering about protecting the traditions of the Senate . . . and the Democrats talking about the need to eliminate obstruction. </p>
<p>Will there be a new &#8220;Gang of 14&#8243; do you think?</p>
<p>You know . . . this flip-flop makes matters very simple for those of us who observe politics.  <br />We just need to replace &#8220;Republican&#8221; with &#8220;Democrat&#8221; and vice versa at the header of most institutional-related Talking Points, and we are good to go. </p>
<p>I also note that Obama has been condemned by some folks in the European press as a &#8220;war monger&#8221; for his committment to Afghanistan.  </p>
<p>Everything old is new again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rudi</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/24404/what-kind-of-transition-will-we-have/comment-page-1/#comment-164443</link>
		<dc:creator>Rudi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/at-tmv/24404/what-kind-of-transition-will-we-have/#comment-164443</guid>
		<description>Komrad Marlow - You forget the partisan nature of Spencer Abraham, Clinton and the Sixth Circuit. I would  LMAO if the Demonocrats resurrect the &#039;nuclear option&#039; , maybe even go beyond judges.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Komrad Marlow &#8211; You forget the partisan nature of Spencer Abraham, Clinton and the Sixth Circuit. I would  LMAO if the Demonocrats resurrect the &#39;nuclear option&#39; , maybe even go beyond judges.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StockBoySF</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/24404/what-kind-of-transition-will-we-have/comment-page-1/#comment-164442</link>
		<dc:creator>StockBoySF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/at-tmv/24404/what-kind-of-transition-will-we-have/#comment-164442</guid>
		<description>I think Obama is laying  the groundwork (and not just saying so) for bipartisan agreement).  Still the Republicans need to make the decision to be agreeable and on the Democratic side it would be helpful if Obama would name Republicans to his cabinet.  Even George W. Bush had a couple Dems in his first cabinet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Obama is laying  the groundwork (and not just saying so) for bipartisan agreement).  Still the Republicans need to make the decision to be agreeable and on the Democratic side it would be helpful if Obama would name Republicans to his cabinet.  Even George W. Bush had a couple Dems in his first cabinet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marlowecan</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/24404/what-kind-of-transition-will-we-have/comment-page-1/#comment-164431</link>
		<dc:creator>Marlowecan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 10:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/at-tmv/24404/what-kind-of-transition-will-we-have/#comment-164431</guid>
		<description>The transition will clearly be much better than in either 2000 or 2004.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Two reasons:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(1)  President Bush has gone FAR beyond any previous president in ensuring this will be seamless transition.  Obama was talking yesterday about how he already has team members shadowing Paulson etc.  Even before the election, the Bush administration had briefings with both contenders on security issues to get over the dangerous transition period.  Contrary to the surliness -- if not the myth of the removal of &quot;W&quot;s from WH keyboards -- with which Bush was &quot;welcomed&quot; in 2000,  Bush appears focused on ensuring a seamless and hospitable transition.  Even the New York Times has given him credit for this. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(2) A Democrat has won.  This time, in 2004, Democratic blogs were wondering if they could turn electors so as to &quot;elect&quot; John Kerry...there was the &quot;Not My President&quot; meme, which was widespread among Democrats...as well as that bizarre series of online photographs apologizing to the world for the election of Bush.  Classy!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And, of course, who can forget the sheer hatred, and bile, directed at those in Red States who had the nerve to vote for Bush over Kerry.   &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Novelist Jane Smiley&#039;s lovely little 2004 essay - &quot;Why Americans Hate Democrats - the unteachable ignorance of the red states&quot; -- is an example of how Democrats respond to Republican victories.  How many of these pieces filled the newspapers in 2004?  There has been none of that this time. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.slate.com/id/2109218/&quot;&gt;http://www.slate.com/id/2109218/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I particularly enjoyed Smiley&#039;s stereotyped smear of tens of millions of Americans: &quot; red state types, above all, do not want to be told what to do—they prefer to be ignorant. As a result, they are virtually unteachable.  . . . .&lt;br&gt;red state types love to cheat and intimidate. . . &quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No, I don&#039;t think this transition will see anything like that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;President-elect Obama won.  Republicans are focused on looking at their own faults, instead of conspiracy theories and ranting about the &quot;ignorance&quot; of those who do not share their views.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The transition will clearly be much better than in either 2000 or 2004.</p>
<p>Two reasons:</p>
<p>(1)  President Bush has gone FAR beyond any previous president in ensuring this will be seamless transition.  Obama was talking yesterday about how he already has team members shadowing Paulson etc.  Even before the election, the Bush administration had briefings with both contenders on security issues to get over the dangerous transition period.  Contrary to the surliness &#8212; if not the myth of the removal of &#8220;W&#8221;s from WH keyboards &#8212; with which Bush was &#8220;welcomed&#8221; in 2000,  Bush appears focused on ensuring a seamless and hospitable transition.  Even the New York Times has given him credit for this. </p>
<p>(2) A Democrat has won.  This time, in 2004, Democratic blogs were wondering if they could turn electors so as to &#8220;elect&#8221; John Kerry&#8230;there was the &#8220;Not My President&#8221; meme, which was widespread among Democrats&#8230;as well as that bizarre series of online photographs apologizing to the world for the election of Bush.  Classy!</p>
<p>And, of course, who can forget the sheer hatred, and bile, directed at those in Red States who had the nerve to vote for Bush over Kerry.   </p>
<p>Novelist Jane Smiley&#39;s lovely little 2004 essay &#8211; &#8220;Why Americans Hate Democrats &#8211; the unteachable ignorance of the red states&#8221; &#8212; is an example of how Democrats respond to Republican victories.  How many of these pieces filled the newspapers in 2004?  There has been none of that this time. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2109218/">http://www.slate.com/id/2109218/</a></p>
<p>I particularly enjoyed Smiley&#39;s stereotyped smear of tens of millions of Americans: &#8221; red state types, above all, do not want to be told what to do—they prefer to be ignorant. As a result, they are virtually unteachable.  . . . .<br />red state types love to cheat and intimidate. . . &#8220;</p>
<p>No, I don&#39;t think this transition will see anything like that.</p>
<p>President-elect Obama won.  Republicans are focused on looking at their own faults, instead of conspiracy theories and ranting about the &#8220;ignorance&#8221; of those who do not share their views.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

