Comments on: Joe Biden: The Already Invisible Man

By: Whistle & Fish Werewolf Tales : Obama, Day 11: A Level Playing Field

Whistle & Fish Werewolf Tales : Obama, Day 11: A Level Playing Field — Sat, 31 Jan 2009 01:48:28 +0000

[...] Joe Biden: The Already Invisible Man (themoderatevoice.com) This entry was posted 30 January 2009 at 8:47 pm in the Uncategorized category. | Tags: Barack Obama, Barack Obama presidential campaign 2008, Dick Cheney, Energy Task Force, Joe Biden, Middle Class Task Force, Politics, United States, Vice President of the United States | Permalink | SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: “Obama, Day 11: A Level Playing Field”, url: “http://www.whistleandfish.com/2009/01/30/obama-day-11-a-level-playing-field/” }); [...]

By: kritt11

kritt11 — Mon, 17 Nov 2008 04:11:02 +0000

Pls DLS- Palin was not abused by the liberal media. There were plenty of conservatives and moderate Republicans who were coming out against her as well as liberals. The press' job is to reveal whether she's a worthy candidate or just mouthing the party platform- and that's just what they did. Thank you Katie Couric.

If there would be anyone more dangerous at VP than Cheney, it would be Palin.

By: DLS

DLS — Sun, 16 Nov 2008 19:14:55 +0000

Hopefully he'll provide the foreign policy advice that makes this issue less of a cause of concern about the Democrats; his vanishing is not a surprise, nor the hypocritical treatment of this by the liberal media as contrasted with how Sarah Palin was treated by them (which actually gave Palin and the GOP team legitimate grounds for controlling media access to — and abuse of — her).

By: StockBoySF

StockBoySF — Sun, 16 Nov 2008 18:22:59 +0000

I have a question (no need to answer it in response). Consider this a public service announcement or maybe today's lesson in civics…

How many cabinet officials can we all name? I used to know all of them but realized, while ondering Obama's possible picks, that I no longer know them all…. I don't know if that says something about me, about the media (not reporting on what the government is doing), or the Bush administration or something else. But herewith is a link to the presidential succession (I had forgotten the entire order, too).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_pres...

kritt, I'm not too keen on Richardson being Sec. of State (but not against it)….. On an earlier post by someone I mentioned I could go either way with Hillary…. I'd like to see a Republican named….

By: kritt11

kritt11 — Sun, 16 Nov 2008 16:30:45 +0000

Biden will still be VP- no one expects another Dick Cheney who ran circles around Rice and Powell. There will be plenty for him to do in the realm of domestic policy– and I'm sure having Hillary at the helm would not prevent him from having some input. But, I actually think Obama should pick Bill Richardson.

By: Manchester2

Manchester2 — Sun, 16 Nov 2008 13:17:15 +0000

Biden has been in the Senate for more than 3 decades. He saw the Vice Presidency as a chance to end a long career honorably. Besides, it's apparent he'll never earn the Presidency on his own merits. At least he can be a “heart-beat away.”

By: superdestroyer

superdestroyer — Sun, 16 Nov 2008 13:15:02 +0000

Biden was picked because he was much older than Obama, would not be running for president in eight years, and is considering a laughing stock by the main stream media. There is zero chance that Biden would overshadow Obama in any way.

By: RHM

RHM — Sun, 16 Nov 2008 13:07:13 +0000

Tony, there's no way in hell Hillary will be Secretary of State. I honestly think Obama has those conversations with her just to stroke her ego. She and Bill not only have too much baggage, but would pull the rug out from under his feet every chance they get. And do you honestly think HRC would put herself in a position where she could be fired? No way.

She'll be the next justice appointed to SCOTUS.

Just my two pesos,

RHM

By: StockBoySF

StockBoySF — Sun, 16 Nov 2008 00:01:44 +0000

Tony, we always knew that Obama would appoint a Sec. of State that wasn't Biden. Are you suggesting that Hillary will have a more powerful voice in one of the administration's most powerful positions than someone else named? If you believe that Hillary would be more influential than someone else in that position then why would we want a wallflower as Sec. of State?