<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Defense of Debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/24378/in-defense-of-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/24378/in-defense-of-debate/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:30:30 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: adsl viettel</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/24378/in-defense-of-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-200500</link>
		<dc:creator>adsl viettel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 10:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/republican-party/24378/in-defense-of-debate/#comment-200500</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s awesome. I&#039;m very glad you posted this. So i have just given it a Digg :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#39;s awesome. I&#39;m very glad you posted this. So i have just given it a Digg <img src='http://themoderatevoice.com/wordpress-engine/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLS</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/24378/in-defense-of-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-164377</link>
		<dc:creator>DLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 18:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/republican-party/24378/in-defense-of-debate/#comment-164377</guid>
		<description>Back on the road -- seems to work fine here, though at the other site yesterday only using this site crashed, not going to anything else; could be a DLS relief test periodically imposed.  (No reduction in comment strings on any thread, I noticed already.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;By the way, last night on the news I heard that naturally, Obama prefers the Mac.  (Someone in my family is religious about their Mac, or should I say conceited sometimes, which is why I try to avoid being so Mac-dedicated myself.  PC&#039;s I guess are just &quot;unwashed masses&quot; devices...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back on the road &#8212; seems to work fine here, though at the other site yesterday only using this site crashed, not going to anything else; could be a DLS relief test periodically imposed.  (No reduction in comment strings on any thread, I noticed already.)</p>
<p>By the way, last night on the news I heard that naturally, Obama prefers the Mac.  (Someone in my family is religious about their Mac, or should I say conceited sometimes, which is why I try to avoid being so Mac-dedicated myself.  PC&#39;s I guess are just &#8220;unwashed masses&#8221; devices&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StockBoySF</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/24378/in-defense-of-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-164285</link>
		<dc:creator>StockBoySF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 20:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/republican-party/24378/in-defense-of-debate/#comment-164285</guid>
		<description>DLS:  I don&#039;t think it&#039;s the site that keeps crashing.... I have a similar problem that you have when I use a PC.  However I generally have no problems with any of my Apple computers.....  So if you&#039;re using a PC I&#039;d suggest that you throw away that old dinosaur and go with a Mac.  :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For full disclosure I do not work for Apple nor do I own any Apple stock.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DLS:  I don&#39;t think it&#39;s the site that keeps crashing&#8230;. I have a similar problem that you have when I use a PC.  However I generally have no problems with any of my Apple computers&#8230;..  So if you&#39;re using a PC I&#39;d suggest that you throw away that old dinosaur and go with a Mac.  <img src='http://themoderatevoice.com/wordpress-engine/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>For full disclosure I do not work for Apple nor do I own any Apple stock.  <img src='http://themoderatevoice.com/wordpress-engine/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PattonGuy</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/24378/in-defense-of-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-164279</link>
		<dc:creator>PattonGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 19:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/republican-party/24378/in-defense-of-debate/#comment-164279</guid>
		<description>Heh, that was me.  I think it could possibly be a good thing to have no political parties.  That&#039;s what the Founders intended, if I remember correctly.  I would like to see the political parties lose some of their clout, but I don&#039;t think I&#039;m ready for something like what they have in Israel, where they have lots of political parties, and a single one can never form a majority.  The fact that an ultra-Orthodox party named Shas refused caused them to have to go into elections over there.  The only way that Shas would join was if the negotiations with the Palestinians stopped.  So the danger with having too many parties is that it gives the extremists (on either side) more of a voice than they deserve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh, that was me.  I think it could possibly be a good thing to have no political parties.  That&#39;s what the Founders intended, if I remember correctly.  I would like to see the political parties lose some of their clout, but I don&#39;t think I&#39;m ready for something like what they have in Israel, where they have lots of political parties, and a single one can never form a majority.  The fact that an ultra-Orthodox party named Shas refused caused them to have to go into elections over there.  The only way that Shas would join was if the negotiations with the Palestinians stopped.  So the danger with having too many parties is that it gives the extremists (on either side) more of a voice than they deserve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JSpencer</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/24378/in-defense-of-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-164274</link>
		<dc:creator>JSpencer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 18:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/republican-party/24378/in-defense-of-debate/#comment-164274</guid>
		<description>DSL, I accept that my comment re: the merits of proportional representation may not apply to you in particular.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DSL, I accept that my comment re: the merits of proportional representation may not apply to you in particular.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLS</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/24378/in-defense-of-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-164270</link>
		<dc:creator>DLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 17:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/republican-party/24378/in-defense-of-debate/#comment-164270</guid>
		<description>(Re-posting -- continued crashes -- that&#039;s one way to get &quot;relief from DLS,&quot; I suppose, but awfully crude; even the Russians are more sophisticated)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1. Sorry for earlier repeated remarks, but Disqus is causing multiple successive crashes and not displaying earlier posted remarks on the rare occasions when it does display _something_.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2. J. Spence -- I&#039;ve posted several times for ages about proportional representation; it has not suddenly been &quot;discovered&quot; by me here and now to give the GOP (hardly the fringe that the far Left is) a token measure of influence.  At issue was what to do about parties (and the Duopoly).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;3. Note the example at thread start is a caucus of ... Democrats, i.e., a partisan source.  A group of big-government fans (just not too much or too harsh big government, no icky stuff) from both parties might be a suitably misnamed &quot;moderate&quot; or &quot;mainstream&quot; (as of 1965) caucus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Re-posting &#8212; continued crashes &#8212; that&#39;s one way to get &#8220;relief from DLS,&#8221; I suppose, but awfully crude; even the Russians are more sophisticated)</p>
<p>1. Sorry for earlier repeated remarks, but Disqus is causing multiple successive crashes and not displaying earlier posted remarks on the rare occasions when it does display _something_.</p>
<p>2. J. Spence &#8212; I&#39;ve posted several times for ages about proportional representation; it has not suddenly been &#8220;discovered&#8221; by me here and now to give the GOP (hardly the fringe that the far Left is) a token measure of influence.  At issue was what to do about parties (and the Duopoly).</p>
<p>3. Note the example at thread start is a caucus of &#8230; Democrats, i.e., a partisan source.  A group of big-government fans (just not too much or too harsh big government, no icky stuff) from both parties might be a suitably misnamed &#8220;moderate&#8221; or &#8220;mainstream&#8221; (as of 1965) caucus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLS</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/24378/in-defense-of-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-164267</link>
		<dc:creator>DLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 17:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/republican-party/24378/in-defense-of-debate/#comment-164267</guid>
		<description>1. Sorry for repetitions but Disqus thread has commonly not been showing earlier posted remarks, and causing Web browser currently to crash a lot.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2. J. Spencer -- I have been on record numerous times in support of proportional representation, advocating it to fringe lefties, but in support of the concept itself, defending it against the contempt shown for it by the establishment Duopoly folks such as the Wall Street Journal (you know their stance on Perot and third-party people, probably, too), referring users to Douglas Amy&#039;s Proportional Representation Library site long before we, the people, cast our no-confidence vote in the GOP earlier this month.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;3. Note that the caucus example given is composed of partisan members (Democrats).  A misleadingly-named caucus consisting of people from both major political parties now that might be used as an example, in favor of big government, just not too big or nastty, would be a &quot;moderate&quot; or &quot;mainstream&quot; caucus.  (As of 1965, perhaps...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Sorry for repetitions but Disqus thread has commonly not been showing earlier posted remarks, and causing Web browser currently to crash a lot.</p>
<p>2. J. Spencer &#8212; I have been on record numerous times in support of proportional representation, advocating it to fringe lefties, but in support of the concept itself, defending it against the contempt shown for it by the establishment Duopoly folks such as the Wall Street Journal (you know their stance on Perot and third-party people, probably, too), referring users to Douglas Amy&#39;s Proportional Representation Library site long before we, the people, cast our no-confidence vote in the GOP earlier this month.</p>
<p>3. Note that the caucus example given is composed of partisan members (Democrats).  A misleadingly-named caucus consisting of people from both major political parties now that might be used as an example, in favor of big government, just not too big or nastty, would be a &#8220;moderate&#8221; or &#8220;mainstream&#8221; caucus.  (As of 1965, perhaps&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JSpencer</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/24378/in-defense-of-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-164266</link>
		<dc:creator>JSpencer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 17:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/republican-party/24378/in-defense-of-debate/#comment-164266</guid>
		<description>Maybe not so simple Pete, but it&#039;s a good idea. In that same vein, I like your&#039;s too DLS, although I recall hearing similar suggestions coming from the left after GWB was elected. Funny how it&#039;s merits appreciate or depreciate depending on whether you feel represented or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe not so simple Pete, but it&#39;s a good idea. In that same vein, I like your&#39;s too DLS, although I recall hearing similar suggestions coming from the left after GWB was elected. Funny how it&#39;s merits appreciate or depreciate depending on whether you feel represented or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLS</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/24378/in-defense-of-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-164263</link>
		<dc:creator>DLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 17:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/republican-party/24378/in-defense-of-debate/#comment-164263</guid>
		<description>(Trying again -- site keeps crashing)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;d like to see the two major parties fractured into 4-6+ parties, additional parties invited to join them, and seats in the House of Representatives and in state legislatures awarded on the basis of proportional representation of election results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Trying again &#8212; site keeps crashing)</p>
<p>I&#39;d like to see the two major parties fractured into 4-6+ parties, additional parties invited to join them, and seats in the House of Representatives and in state legislatures awarded on the basis of proportional representation of election results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLS</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/24378/in-defense-of-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-164262</link>
		<dc:creator>DLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 17:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/republican-party/24378/in-defense-of-debate/#comment-164262</guid>
		<description>(Attempting again because of site crashes)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Before writing off the parties, I&#039;d like to see the Duopoly fractured into 4-6+ parties, adding one or more &quot;outsider&quot; parties, and then going to proportional representation in the House of Representatives (in cases of states with five or more seats, or go to regional apportionment and allocation to address the small-state problem) and in state legislatures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Attempting again because of site crashes)</p>
<p>Before writing off the parties, I&#39;d like to see the Duopoly fractured into 4-6+ parties, adding one or more &#8220;outsider&#8221; parties, and then going to proportional representation in the House of Representatives (in cases of states with five or more seats, or go to regional apportionment and allocation to address the small-state problem) and in state legislatures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLS</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/24378/in-defense-of-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-164261</link>
		<dc:creator>DLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 17:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/republican-party/24378/in-defense-of-debate/#comment-164261</guid>
		<description>Before writing off parties, I&#039;d like to see the Duopoly fractured into 4-6+ parties and perhaps one or more new &quot;outsider&quot; parties introduced and have our House of Representatives (in cases of five or more seats in a state, or going to regional rather than state-district seat allocation to address the small-state problem) go to proportional representation (as in the state legislatures, fit as they are for reform anyway).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before writing off parties, I&#39;d like to see the Duopoly fractured into 4-6+ parties and perhaps one or more new &#8220;outsider&#8221; parties introduced and have our House of Representatives (in cases of five or more seats in a state, or going to regional rather than state-district seat allocation to address the small-state problem) go to proportional representation (as in the state legislatures, fit as they are for reform anyway).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
