An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Barack and Hillary: Team of Allies?

Obama and Hillary met in Chicago yesterday and apparently discussed what role she might play in Obama’s administration. Secretary of State remains at the top of the rumour mill, and, as I put it earlier today, although I would prefer Kerry for the job, strictly in terms of policy considerations, I am certainly intrigued by the idea of Hillary and Obama working together, if that is possible (and if she wouldn’t overshadow him), to chart a new course for U.S. foreign policy.

Steve Clemons has been following this rumour for some time and now thinks it’s a serious possibility. And he presents an interesting theory as to what Obama might be up to: “[T]his is EXACTLY what George W. Bush did to his most serious rival in 2000, Colin Powell. He gave Powell Secretary of State and then began to box him up. Barack Obama may be on the same track with Hillary Clinton who is and was his chief rival in the Democratic Party today.”

That may very well be the case, but I think Obama is in a much stronger position than Bush was in back in 2000. He also seems to be incredibly confident and sure of himself and what he is doing — more so now in victory than every before. I doubt he’s all that worried about Hillary mounting some sort of challenge to him. True, it is wise to keep your friends close and your enemies closer, but is Hillary really an enemy? And does Obama really think he needs to “box” her in?

Again, maybe. If Obama stumbles, she could indeed emerge as a formidable rival after the 2010 midterms. The case would be made, after all, that it should have been Hillary all along, that things would be different, and better, if only she had won the nomination. And, yes, Obama is certainly a shrewd political operator who knows how to prepare well for future political battles. (Consider that he is set to meet with McCain on Monday, a shrewd move not just to reach out to his recent opponent but to shore up possible support down the road.)

But I simply do not think that the motivation for appointing Hillary to State are so entirely self-serving (and, to be fair, Steve may not think so either). Maybe I’m not being cynical enough today, but it could be that Obama thinks that Hillary would actually be a positive addition to his administration, that they actually could work well together, that she would be an excellent secretary of state at this extremely challenging time.

We tend to think of them, coming out of that long and at times bitter and nasty primary season, as rivals, and as the two of them as a possible “Team of Rivals,” but what if, with the election over, they are actually, or could actually be, allies — that is, a Team of Allies?

Possible, no?

**********

Of course, it could all be a Clintonite-driven media “freak show.” But I suspect there’s a bit more to it than that.

**********

CNN is reporting that Obama and Hillary did in fact discuss the secretary of state job. Apparently, Obama wanted “to gauge Clinton’s interest in the post of Secretary of State, if she were offered it. Senator Clinton’s response is unknown, although multiple sources agree that Hillary Clinton was left with the impression that if she were interested in the post, it would be hers.”

Note, however, that the CNN piece relies on anonymous “Democratic sources.” They could well be pro-Hillary sources.

(Cross-posted from The Reaction.)

  • AustinRoth
    Hillary would be so much better than Kerry as SoS. Why would Obama want our own Neville Chamberlain in that role?
  • StockBoySF
    Austin, I agree with you: Hillary would be the better pick over Kerry. Obama can give the Sec. of Defense job to Kerry. Just kidding.... I couldn't resist it! :)

    One of the concerns I had about McCain was his advisors who were (or had been) lobbyists for foreign governments... Myanmar and Georgia to name two. Anyway I have that same concern with Hillary.... Bill has ties to foreign governments and probably has accepted money for speaking engagements.... I honestly don't know the extent of Bill's involvement with foreign governments or if there should be any concern, but IMO that's a question to a least ask and consider. I don't want any conflicts of interests (or even the appearance of conflicts of interest) between the good of the US and other countries when it comes to this position.

    While I do think Hillary is a better choice than Kerry, I'm just lukewarm about her. I can be persuaded either way.... Rare that I can be easily persuaded on something, so relish the opportunity while you have the chance! :)

    Interestingly, the same concern I have for Bill's relationship with foreign governments is also one of the selling points (in my view) for Hillary being Sec. of State. World leaders know the Clintons and there is history between them. Because there is knowledge on both sides of the other, more may actually be accomplished because less time is spent "divining" what the other side may or may not be saying. Even if a leader doesn't necessarily like Clinton (one or both) and vice versa, at least Clinton is a mostly known quantity.

    Any world leader would be wrong to think that Obama's pick of Clinton as Sec of State is an indication that Obama will follow (more or less) the Bill Clinton approach.... My read is that Obama wants someone to balance his own views.

    Lastly, it would be a great opportunity for Hillary and there is nothing to say that she can't be appointed to the Supreme Court (as was mentioned during the summer) if a spot opens up. If Hillary does choose to run as prez in eight years, Sec. of State is great experience. As long as she avoids tarmac stories in war zones.
  • Zyg
    I think Clinton, Richardson or Kerry would be big mistakes for SOS. If Obama really wants or needs a Republican in his cabinet, then he should pick Colin Powell. He is light years ahead of these 3 in temperament and experience.

    I would replace Gates with Wesley Clark. We all know that during the campaign Obama threw Clark under the bus, when he should have thrown Schieffer instead. He can make up for this making Clark SOD.

    This would then allow him to make the best American available for SOS; Colin Powell, his appointment for this cabinet post.
  • AustinRoth
    Wesley Clark for SecDef? Why not Putin then? Or Chavez?
  • Jammer63021
    Well I think Colin Powell would be a big mistake myself. He is identified world over with Iraq, much more so than Hillary, and he never broke cleanly from it. Kerry, fugget about it. Richardson has the chops but there seems to be something about him...Hillary? Great choice. Tough as nails but clearly seems to work well with Obama and they seem to have some affection for each other from the body language I can see. I love the fact that Obama is reaching out to his rivals ala Lincoln and frankly it is exactly what I expected. Anyone who thought that Obama';s election would be a time for vengeance against your enemies read the man completely wrong.

    Oh and I could not resist: someone equates Wesley Clark with Putin or Chavez? that is really bone headed.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC