An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

The Barack Obama Landslide & Leading America Out Of The Wilderness

01aaa_obama_grant.JPG

I voted yesterday in the most important election of my lifetime after the most dramatic primary and general election campaign of my lifetime. And as I left the polling station and walked out into the chilly morning air, it all fell into place: Barack Obama represents what America once was and can stand for again. As well as this: Obama did not transcend race so much as make the case that he is the best man to lead America out of the wilderness.

If that seems simplistic, it is. Because while the hydra-headed monster of racism may have been bowed in 2008, it has not been beaten. In fact, John McCain, Sarah Palin and their surrogates took demagoguery to new heights in a campaign that never found its groove except when it came to fear mongering.

Yes, John McCain’s concession speech seemed to be gracious. Yet I am not a light switch and was unable to suddenly turn off the horror that I felt over the last few months as I watched him shamelessly wield the cudgels of race and class warfare in a manner so loathsome that his one-time maverickness and POW hero status became abstractions. But in the end, the squalid message of his campaign was merely so much noise for voters who are indeed fearful, but not of a man with black skin and a funny name.

Palin, meanwhile, joins the long list of one-election wonders who didn’t even have the chops of the late-night comedienne who used this queen of mean’s own lines to devastating effect.

* * * * *

I struck up a conversation with a forty-something black woman wearing a Bob Marley t-shirt at an Obama-Biden rally the other day. Did she know that the reggae legend had worked at the Chrysler auto assembly plant here in Newark, Delaware before he returned home to Jamaica and hit the big time? She said that she did not.

“Bob would have understood how important this election is,” I said.

“Yes,” she replied, looking me in the eye. “I cannot begin to tell you how much it means to me and my mother.”

I think I do understand. That is because my long departed parents were civil-rights activists who despite being optimistic about most things could not imagine the day that a black man would become president of the United States. They were afraid to hope, and today tears of pride and joy burn in my eyes because something that they dared not dream has come to pass.

* * * * *

George Bush’s historic unpopularity, fed by two never ending wars and the coup de grâce of an historic economic collapse that completed his abandonment of the middle class, was the wind at Obama’s back, and conservatives will be nattering from here to Inauguration Day and beyond that the result would have been different had the president they so slavishly supported not been such a toxic boob.

But to suggest that there should be an asterisk next to Obama’s name — that he somehow did not earn his enormous popular and electoral vote landslide victory — is no more plausible than putting an asterisk next to the names of Ronald Reagan or Franklin Roosevelt.

While the Republican brand has been running on empty for longer than anyone realized, least of all the party’s major-domos, I don’t believe that Hillary Clinton would necessarily have beaten McCain. A Clinton-McCain race would have been a battle of Washington insiders, and there was the probability that five or six percent of voters — although not necessarily the same five or six percent — who never would have supported an African-American would never have supported a woman.

* * * * *

People the world over scratch their heads when trying to understand the strange creature known as American presidential politics, and I do too even though this was my ninth campaign as a reporter, editor and most recently a blogger.

Why, they ask every four years, should candidates have to campaign for the better part of two years, raise ungodly sums of money and put their fate in the hands of a bunch of flannel shirts in Iowa and New Hampshire?

The result, it would seem, is that really good people get chased away and the contenders too often include mediocrities. Think people like Michael Dukakis, Pat Buchanan and Rudy Giuliani.

Yet there is an upside to this madness. One-trick ponies tend to get eliminated. (Okay, okay. So George Bush was a no-trick pony). Just being a fresh face is not enough. Being long on organization but nothing else is not enough. Having the vision thing by itself is not enough. And having oodles of money is not enough.

It is a testament to Barack Obama that he had all of those things, including a stupendous $640 million war chest built almost entirely on small contributions, as well as being able to harness a cultural shift that included millions of new voters and master a resource that McCain acknowledged he has never used — the Internet — with its cutting-edge bells and whistles such as YouTube.

But Obama had something else as well that was on display in his magnificent victory speech before the masses in Grant Park early today and billions more watching the world over — a fiery core enveloped by a cool demeanor and the extraordinary ability to stay focused steeled him through myriad controversies and enabled him to hold the upper hand in three debates that effectively sealed the case that he is presidential.

* * * * *

I take scant pleasure that the likes of William Kristol, Rich Lowry, Jonah Goldberg and other right-wing pundits who lip locked with the incredible lightness of Palin while drawing smug satisfaction from the serial character attacks on Obama have been so thoroughly discredited. The lot of them are lightweights. And cowards like the man that they have worshiped for the last eight years.

Besides which, there is no time for schadenfreude, let alone condemning the bitter core of the Republican base as was represented by the people in the crowd in Phoenix last night who reacted with boos when McCain congratulated Obama.

And no looking back except to try to better understand the failures that Obama must now confront as he assembles a Cabinet and tries to cobble together a bipartisan coalition.

It is my fervent belief that President-Elect Barack Hussein Obama, while being mindful that his mandate is to heal as well as to lead, must first reaffirm the core values that George Bush, Dick Cheney and their goon squad suborned in the service of an imperial agenda. He first must make sure that the fundamental rights of all Americans are protected before he can begin to lead us out of the wilderness.

Photograph by Ozier Muhammad/The New York Times

  • superdestroyer
    Shaun

    I guess we will be waiting a while until you attaqck Senator Schumer for wanting to limit speech, or until you attack Ohio for using government records to attack Repubilcans or until you admit that the U.S. is now a one party state and people had better get in line with the state.
  • Marlowecan
    Yes, the Democrats are now the only game in town.

    It will be fascinating to see how Obama's many sympathizers pull their punches with regard to . . . for example . . . executive power. Note how his FISA vote elicited muted grumbles...in contrast with the howls of fury against BushCo.
    If Obama follows the tradition of most presidents, he will be jealously guarding the executive powers of the Presidency as reinforced by his predecessors (i.e., Bush/Cheney).

    Will those who criticized Bush/Cheney for their imperial presidency be so willing to criticize Obama should he indulge in the same hubris?
    That will be the touchstone of true journalists . . . .as opposed to Democratic fellow travellers with Press Passes.

    One of the first good outcomes of this election will be that.... in the next few months... we will be better able to identify the "Sidney Blumenthals" in the MSM.
  • kritt11
    Good post, Shaun.

    I don't understand how anyone who grew up in the Civil Rights era or earlier would not get why this is moment is so momentous for our nation or why every African-American is standing proud this morning. When Obama was born, there were still numerous states that would have outlawed his parents' interracial marriage, and in many places Jim Crow was still the law of the land. I did not vote for him for this reason, but it certainly gives me some hope that we can evolve as a nation.
  • Manchester2
    Shaun:

    You know that I've been as critical as anyone on this site of the tone of your posts. But, Sen. Obama won...fair and square. So, I extend my heartfelt congratulations to you and all those who worked so hard to see Sen. Obama become President-elect Obama. As promised, I changed my Facebook status today, saying that I'm praying for our new President. Let's give this man a chance. We'll see...
  • shaun
    Manchester2:

    A very classy comment.

    As I have written before, alluded to above and will blog incessantly on in the weeks to come, winning the election was actually the easy part. Obama will not get a honeymoon, nor will I allow him one. Stayed tuned . . .
  • Rudi
    This Obamama support won't pull all the punches, I'm waiting for Gitmo to close or another symbolic move to us Liebruls.
  • kritt11
    Marlowe-

    I think if Bush and Cheney had been less partisan and more successful, executive power would not have become such a big issue. Many saw that they were continuing the power grab, but using it to do things like spy on their countrymen,legally redefine and use torture, work toward a permanent GOP majority by politicizing federal agencies, subvert the Geneva Convention and the Constitution, etc. etc.
  • Ricorun
    Marlowecan: Will those who criticized Bush/Cheney for their imperial presidency be so willing to criticize Obama should he indulge in the same hubris?

    I certainly will. Checks and balances are important -- on many levels. The executive branch should not be allowed to dominate. And I, for one, am disappointed the GOP has been so seriously marginalized, because being so they cannot provide an effective check to the Dems in the legislative branch, either. But I also believe the GOP has to re-think their coalition, too. There's simply no future for them if they don't. And one place I think they could start (other than refomulate what "social conservatism" means) is to rethink their emphasis on small government -- or at least fold it in with a greater emphasis on competency. In other words, I think a better concept is efficient government.
  • Marlow,
    I assure you that I did not merely grumble when Obama supported telecom immunity. That betrayal alone wasn't enough to force me into the arms of Sen. Clinton however. I did not simply want a return to the Clinton era which I was highly critical of at the time.

    McCain was no alternative at all. He supported telecom immunity AND the odious laws giving legal cover to torture and indefinite detention.
  • AustinRoth
    Shaun -

    I, too, owe you a heartfelt congratulations for your efforts towards Obama. I am happy for our country, happy for the historical nature of Obama's election, and happy for Obama as a person.

    To paraphrase a comment of mine from your live-blogging of the election results:

    "You can oppose a President, think him a complete moron (or a sexual predator), dislike his policies, etc., but we, as a people, HAVE to get back to respecting the office of the Presidency, as compared to the occupant. And that means some modicum of decorum and deference is due the person as well.

    I don't agree with most of Obama's positions, and think he does have an agenda in mind that is WAY more radical than he ran on. But as he has been elected, fairly, he is MY President. Because I am an American, and the will of the voters carries the day."

    I will not go forth with an agenda of looking for reasons to criticize and denigrate him or his Presidency; rather, I will now share in the hope that he will govern wisely, and accept that by his victory, and the Democrats in Congress as well, they have earned the right to pursue their agenda.

    I of course reserve the right to express my concerns about policy differences, but hopefully in a more respectful way than has been directed towards Bush from the Left these past 8 years.

    As always,
    your personal troll
  • DLS
    Once you're done swooning, join us adults who are curious how Obama and the Dems (who did well, though this was largely a negative vote, against the GOP, not for the Dems) will act now that they have responsibility to shoulder and next to no remaining bogus excuses on hand for their failures.

    Obama, at least, seems to be doing the right thing, better than anyone else on recent record, working already to form a Cabinet and get a policy going.
  • DLS
    Bottom line is, McCain and others now and formerly in the military will be saluting Obama after his inauguration if not already.

    I also liked the destruction of the myth promulgated by the farther left in the sewer that the USA is widely racist. The election destroys that myth.
  • DLS
    Also, I've posted links for others to "purple state" sliding-scale colored maps of various elections (along with other graphs that illustrate the nature of the electorate and population distribution in interesting ways) and I'm going to be amused, once the 2008 graphs are available, how much bluer they are this year.
  • DLS
    "true journalists . . . .as opposed to Democratic fellow travellers with Press Passes"

    The latter encompasses nearly all of the "mainstream media."

    What I'll find interesting is how many "Republicans" or "conservatives" rush to ingratiate themselves with the Dems in power in Washington, in order to retain their own Washingtonian stature. (Few "conservative" commentators can become lobbyists the way those in Congress can.)
  • shaun
    AR:

    Thank you, as well.
  • kritt11
    DLS--- It sounds like the Dems will put the S-CHIP bill through , come up with another stimulus package, and then go on to pass stem cell research funding.

    I would also predict they would then try to pass a massive alternative energy package. Those are the main domestic items that were blocked or vetoed by the GOP since '06.
  • bamboozeled
    I hope Obama can pull things together. So much is at stake. If he cant stop the seeming inevitable depression we are heading for, his presidency may just be the greatest gift the republican party could have ever dreamed of. Remember what happened to the party in power in 1929. If things don't get better and fast, the mid term election will be judgment day on democrats, and if what the experts are all saying, about unemployment passing 9% by the summer of 2009, America is going to be in for a rude awakening. And although it wont be President Obamas fault, it very well may define his first term, as 9/11 and the wars that followed defined president Bush.
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC