An Internet hub for moderates, centrists, and independents, with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, and right

Obama as Exemplar: Will The Two Parties Reach Across the Aisle This Time?

Listening to many persons tonight who are moved by Obama’s being Prez-elect, seeing people in the moment changed by their own joy and awe… I just wonder sometimes, don’t we sometimes be changed, even slightly against our wills, when others are changed suddenly for the better? Or just out of their plain happiness for something they value deeply?

Obama has said both parties will work together and he will lead the way. Can this occur really?

Maybe hyper-partisanship needs aggression as an opponent in order to flare? But, what if no opponent is particularly aggressive and there’s nothing for a hyper aggressive person to attach to, to engage? What if by placid or calm demeanor on the part of Dems, there is no ‘there’ there for anyone else looking to scorn-fight? I wonder truly.

Remember that last time the Republicans took over Congress some years back, they were led by example of Newt Gingrich… the scathing talk, the glee and retribution of forcing Dems from their plush offices so Repubs could move in, the closing out of thoughtful Dems for appointments on important committees, the open rancor and paybacks… and so on, were in no way conciliatory… nor honorable.

Leader Newt in fact published a book with a list of derogatory words he felt should be freely applied to Dems. It was not a shining moment for time-honored statesmanship.

Playing tit for tat is considered in developmental psychology the unsocialized trait of the very young and self-centered child. The same deficit of maturity in an adult seems not only foolish, as in short-sighted, but also egotistic in the extreme, hypermanic. Surely, at base, the soul’s gone missing.

Too, later, Dems had their turn to be kings of the dirt pile, and devolved, many of them into doing the same. Subsequently, Repubs under Bush had their chances and doled out the put-downs and casting out, similarly.

Will elected officials be far more mature this time; stop to think this time? Not act as though civility is some cheap gaud, that brotherhood and sisterhood are subhuman and that lording it over others is suprahuman?

I sometimes sense, don’t you, that there is an atmosphere of courtliness that allows / engenders true statesmanship? And there are acid words and actions that scream disrespect, that smash ideas of building and doing ‘together’ into being DOA from day one.

I’m not sure it’s the president who sets tone as much as the VP, the House and Senate Majority Leaders and the Minority leaders, and some of the Cabinet members. What is notable, I think, and this is just my two cents worth, is when a cabinet member or congressional leader says outrageous and ridiculing things about other members of Congress… and the president doesn’t challenge, correct, soften or hold them to a civil discourse… then, like flu, ill-will seems catching by all concerned, including pages, media, lobbyists, constituents, man in the street, pundits, et al

I remember once meeting with the mayor of our city along with three other persons, one a highly competitive man who interrupted and talked over us because he wanted the mayor only to listen to him and his moneyed friends and ideas. You know how it can be when someone suddenly keeps interrupting you and you think that you don’t want to be rude in return, so you remain silent and wait to get a word in edgewise, but the ‘edgewise opportunity’ never comes because the other person’s whole point, you realize too late, is to silence you and highlight only their own interests?

But though the mayor listened to the man, the mayor also bypassed the man by turning his body toward us and speaking to each of us with regard and interest, asking us questions addressed to only us, even though I and the other person were absolute nobodies.

And, at the end of the conversation, the mayor turned to the pushy man and said pointedly, but kindly,

“I want to hear what everyone has to say.” That was Mayor Webb in 1992, often spoken about as ‘the first black mayor of Denver,’ but to many, he was just a decent-enough man who listened to the average Joes, whereas many other officials only listened to the open wallets.

In that case, the leader Webb, brought, for the moment, an overly aggressive, ‘me me me, only me’ person into some semblance of civility. Without the mayor’s comment, the pushy man would have assumed the mayor approved of his marginalizing others. Perhaps the man’s heart was changed, I’d like to think so… or perhaps it was not, but the mayor was bold, insightful, and set the bar nonetheless.

In any event, we will all be watching to see whether three rounds of ‘leg-up’ in the Congress over these many decades, have taught current members of each party to be more well developed with one another, than say, some of their predecessors.

We’ll be watching to see not only if Obama sets new tones, but whether he intervenes effectively, with honor, in the ill-tones/shrill tones of others.

It may really be a new day then.. and wouldn’t that be sweet for us all?

————
h/t Jim Satterfield.

  • spirasol
    Well, sure, and if the way Obama handled the baseless McCain attacks of guilt by association are any signal, it will be a new day. And God Bless him for it for he inspires for it. I say so knowing he is a better man than I. He vows to work with the "honorable" man he just defeated and does not mention the tactics used against him. Rumors have it that his cabinet will be a mix of Dems & Repubs and he continues to vow to work together. And it is clear, and he knows it, that he has stoked the fires of change in the people.............so now, though his supporters know he is not a magician, what form will that CHANGE take. How will he transfer the power of the government to work on behalf of all the people. Indeed the whole world will be watching.
  • CStanley
    I'm not sure I agree, Dr. E. Politics includes strongly held views which are often emotionally charged. Sometimes when an opponent holds his own views very strongly but uses the kind of cool emotionless technique that you commend, it's actually more provoking than it would be if he would just argue back. Coolness too can be a form of aggression, no?

    I think that argument and debate can be hot but civil and respectful. FIght on the issues but don't ever accuse the opponents of fighting in bad faith. That's the right prescription and I'm not sure we're there yet.
  • lizhill2
    I sure hope so, Dr. E. I especially hope that Obama can pick the best people for his cabinet, regardless of party affiliation. Lincoln was known for this-- even appointing former opponents and people who had been outspoken against him, because they were best for the job. So perhaps he will follow the model of that other politician from Illinois.

    Peace to you and your family.
  • archangel
    dear spirasol
    i would like that his cabinet be the most skilled. Like you, I dont clutch on their affiliations. And you're right. The world will be watching. So will we all, hopefully not with jaded eyes... or cross ones.

    dr.e
  • archangel
    dear CStanley: hi there and always glad to see you. I was just thinking of you this morning as I was out near the horses; there's a police horse stable and paddock just a few feet from my door, and I know you care for animals. Regarding your words here: "FIght on the issues but don't ever accuse the opponents of fighting in bad faith." You said it better than I ever could.

    Lack of bad faith would go a long long way as suture in our pretty shredded times. I think too, that not starting hot right into the issues leaves lots of room for discussions to be civil and worked out, and not a perpetual call to arms.... not creating more problems of opprobrium and intense dislike between people in addition to the one issue at hand. Not littering up the field by setting off land mines that make the issue discussion nearly tertiary.

    dr.e
  • archangel
    dear lizhill; you have the name of a person I love, who is also a writer. I wonder.... ? And, I appreciate your remark about Lincoln. "Best for the job" instead of rewarding loyalty only. What a concept.

    Did you see also the Cagle cartoon on TMV last night ... it was the statue of Lincoln monument in DC with a smile on his face, slight tears in his eyes. There is a good deal of revisionism about Lincoln-- all preesidents really. Hopefully we can weigh the best of other presidents, as well as this newest one one one scale; and the not so hot parts/decosions on another... that we as culture can 'learn maybe not a different way but an expanded way' to evaluate imperfect leaders might be another kind of 'change' that would just up us all a notch in evolution. Wouldnt that be something. Thank you for writing, and warm welcome.

    dr.e
  • Leebot
    As a former Denverite, I can just picture Mayor Webb speaking as you've described.

    As someone who has worked with elected officials, I've seen the Obama model of inclusive leadership in action, and a skillful, empathetic, intellectually curious person can indeed make it work. I've seen it in action -- the person engaged in active listening, sufficiently secure in his own sense of self that he was never threatened or defensive in the face of dissenting opinions. Even if, in the end, my ideas or those of another's were not ultimately adopted, we all felt listened to, understood, respected. That alone is empowering.
  • lizhill2
    Yes it's me-- I've been lurking here for a while now, so pleased to be able to read your always thoughtful words in this forum. I did not see the Cagle cartoon of which you speak. But not long ago I saw the old movie Young Abe Lincoln and was stunned to see how manipulative it was-- in the name of patriotism, I'm sure. Abe wasn't perfect and he wasn't afraid to admit it. Frankly, I welcome that in a leader and perhaps if we saw it more often we could learn to accept it, instead of seeing it as a sign of "weakness."

    I read about your family's recent loss and send lots of love your way. We are in St Paul MN now and I still miss Denver lots.
    Liz
  • river
    dear Dr. E. . . a short explanation for what i am perceiving these last couple of days. . .my mother had to leave for a few years after my birth due to 8 children and illness. . .but this is not a sad story. . . for at ten months after being a FTT my siblings sat me on the ground by the horse lot. . .and was taken in by the lead horse. . .they found i would eat if they put me on her back. . .by age two had learned how to climb the fence and Filly would come and press up close so i could climb on and she would take me down into the pasture to spend most of my time with the herd. . . she would bring me back every couple of hours to see if i needed off. . .energy learned from horses and nature was my Mother tongue. . . was swallowed up by the Great Mother. . .and Filly and the Great Mother was "good enough and because of first language i have been an energetic. . . open to the collective and life force energies. . .

    the last couple of days. . .have noticed a change in what i call the collective energies. . . have never experienced the collective degree of lightness to such degree. . .don't know if i have words to explain it. . . but there is a clearing and freshness. . . it is more than Obama as politician. . .more than the beautiful graciousness of John McCain's concession speak. . . something larger than left or right. . . political. . . Polosi. . .Reed. . .Rice. . .Powell. . .don't think it is about the polarities. . . or who won or who lost. . .but rather a circle of hearts extending around the world with a hope and a prayer for all of us to live from our "better angels". . .perhaps every increase in collective consciousness emerges from the encounter with abyssal darkness and chaos, but somehow much like pandora's box all that was left was "the audacity of hope". . .then when the lid was opened the compensating wind of spirit rushed in to fill the darkness leaving light and freshness. . .a freshness that feel like Spring in the pastures with the air filled with the mesquite . . .sage. . .cedar. . .tender young grass. . .from the first gentle rain. . .

    maybe i have drank the kool-aid???. . . i may not have the words. . .but something has happened to elevate the collective energies. . . whatever has happened it sure is sweet. . . i believe and perceive a chance for a new beginning. . .
  • archangel
    Dear River: a good many persons who have that kind of internal/external 'antennae' can feel movements in culture daily, sometimes from moment to moment. It's not kool-aid. The kool-aid trope is a scorn phrase meant to denigrate a, not irrational, but non-rational process of knowing. Many persons, however, carry this intuitive gift, and the managing of it is based on learning its lability and its stabilities.

    As you know, if you mentioned your thoughts to a Hopi elder or the Ekhatl medicine people who live along the border, ancient cultures, they would understand your language and experience completely. Out here in the west, your 'learning from horses' is considered by me, and others, as sacred. The challenge always, is to bring the intuitive function down to earth in useful and often, pragmatic, ways.

    dr.e
blog comments powered by Disqus
© 2005-2009 The Moderate Voice | Site design by Elegant Themes | Site customization, hosting, and security by Enxit Group, LLC