
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Syria Attack Shows Meaning of U.S.-Iraq Security Deal: Al Gomhuria, Egypt</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themoderatevoice.com/23891/syria-attack-shows-meaning-of-us-iraq-security-deal-al-gomhuria-egypt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/23891/syria-attack-shows-meaning-of-us-iraq-security-deal-al-gomhuria-egypt/</link>
	<description>An Internet hub with domestic and international news, analysis, original reporting, and popular features from the left, center, indies, centrists, moderates, and right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 07:46:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manchester2</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/23891/syria-attack-shows-meaning-of-us-iraq-security-deal-al-gomhuria-egypt/comment-page-1/#comment-161488</link>
		<dc:creator>Manchester2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 19:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/military/military-affairs/23891/syria-attack-shows-meaning-of-us-iraq-security-deal-al-gomhuria-egypt/#comment-161488</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://BBCNews.com&quot;&gt;BBCNews.com&lt;/a&gt;, hardly a pro-Bush site, is reporting the rationale for this one-time raid five miles into Syrian territory:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;The US military sent troops 8km (five miles) into Syria, to the village of Sukkiraya, to take action which they hope will help shut down al-Qaeda&#039;s secret pipeline into Iraq for men, weapons and money.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The mission was to capture or kill, Abu Ghadiya, an Iraqi-born al-Qaeda cell leader the US says has helped to bring thousands of jihadist fighters across the border.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sen. Obama has repeatedly said he would authorize cross-border raids into Pakistan, if it meant smoking out terrorists. Is there a difference between that and what President Bush has done?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://BBCNews.com">BBCNews.com</a>, hardly a pro-Bush site, is reporting the rationale for this one-time raid five miles into Syrian territory:</p>
<p>&#8220;The US military sent troops 8km (five miles) into Syria, to the village of Sukkiraya, to take action which they hope will help shut down al-Qaeda&#39;s secret pipeline into Iraq for men, weapons and money.</p>
<p>The mission was to capture or kill, Abu Ghadiya, an Iraqi-born al-Qaeda cell leader the US says has helped to bring thousands of jihadist fighters across the border.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sen. Obama has repeatedly said he would authorize cross-border raids into Pakistan, if it meant smoking out terrorists. Is there a difference between that and what President Bush has done?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kritt11</title>
		<link>http://themoderatevoice.com/23891/syria-attack-shows-meaning-of-us-iraq-security-deal-al-gomhuria-egypt/comment-page-1/#comment-161475</link>
		<dc:creator>kritt11</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 18:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/military/military-affairs/23891/syria-attack-shows-meaning-of-us-iraq-security-deal-al-gomhuria-egypt/#comment-161475</guid>
		<description>Why did Bush attack Syria? Because altho he managed to stretch the US military in two endless wars,jettisoned our economic prosperity,  and ruined our international reputation, he did not want to leave office without starting WWIII.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why did Bush attack Syria? Because altho he managed to stretch the US military in two endless wars,jettisoned our economic prosperity,  and ruined our international reputation, he did not want to leave office without starting WWIII.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

